All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] latencytop: fix kernel panic and memory leak on proc
@ 2008-02-14 22:51 Hiroshi Shimamoto
  2008-02-15  0:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto @ 2008-02-14 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Arjan van de Ven, Ingo Molnar

Hi,

I posted 2 patches to fix kernel panic and memory leak.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/282
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/283

But, I think this patch is better than old ones.

---
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>

Reading /proc/<pid>/latency or /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/latency could cause
NULL pointer dereference.

In lstats_open(), get_proc_task() can return NULL, in which case the kernel
will oops at lstats_show_proc() because m->private is NULL.

This can be reproduced by the follwoing script.
while :
do
	bash -c 'ls > ls.$$' &
	pid=$!
	cat /proc/$pid/latency &
	cat /proc/$pid/latency &
	cat /proc/$pid/latency &
	cat /proc/$pid/latency
done

And the task struct which gotten by get_proc_task() is never put.
put_task_struct() should be called.

This patch changes the private is used to store inode, and the task struct
will be gotten and putted in read or write function.

Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
---
 fs/proc/base.c |   27 +++++++++++----------------
 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 7c6b4ec..5de8dd5 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -314,9 +314,12 @@ static int proc_pid_schedstat(struct task_struct *task, char *buffer)
 static int lstats_show_proc(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 {
 	int i;
-	struct task_struct *task = m->private;
-	seq_puts(m, "Latency Top version : v0.1\n");
+	struct inode *inode = m->private;
+	struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(inode);
 
+	if (!task)
+		return -ESRCH;
+	seq_puts(m, "Latency Top version : v0.1\n");
 	for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
 		if (task->latency_record[i].backtrace[0]) {
 			int q;
@@ -341,32 +344,24 @@ static int lstats_show_proc(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 		}
 
 	}
+	put_task_struct(task);
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static int lstats_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 {
-	int ret;
-	struct seq_file *m;
-	struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(inode);
-
-	ret = single_open(file, lstats_show_proc, NULL);
-	if (!ret) {
-		m = file->private_data;
-		m->private = task;
-	}
-	return ret;
+	return single_open(file, lstats_show_proc, inode);
 }
 
 static ssize_t lstats_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 			    size_t count, loff_t *offs)
 {
-	struct seq_file *m;
-	struct task_struct *task;
+	struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(file->f_dentry->d_inode);
 
-	m = file->private_data;
-	task = m->private;
+	if (!task)
+		return -ESRCH;
 	clear_all_latency_tracing(task);
+	put_task_struct(task);
 
 	return count;
 }
-- 
1.5.3.8


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] latencytop: fix kernel panic and memory leak on proc
  2008-02-14 22:51 [PATCH] latencytop: fix kernel panic and memory leak on proc Hiroshi Shimamoto
@ 2008-02-15  0:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
  2008-02-15  1:13   ` Ingo Molnar
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arjan van de Ven @ 2008-02-15  0:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hiroshi Shimamoto; +Cc: linux-kernel, Ingo Molnar

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:51:19 -0800
Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I posted 2 patches to fix kernel panic and memory leak.
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/282
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/283
> 
> But, I think this patch is better than old ones.
> 
> ---
> From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
> 
> Reading /proc/<pid>/latency or /proc/<pid>/task/<tid>/latency could
> cause NULL pointer dereference.
> 
> In lstats_open(), get_proc_task() can return NULL, in which case the
> kernel will oops at lstats_show_proc() because m->private is NULL.
> 
> This can be reproduced by the follwoing script.
> while :
> do
> 	bash -c 'ls > ls.$$' &
> 	pid=$!
> 	cat /proc/$pid/latency &
> 	cat /proc/$pid/latency &
> 	cat /proc/$pid/latency &
> 	cat /proc/$pid/latency
> done
> 
> And the task struct which gotten by get_proc_task() is never put.
> put_task_struct() should be called.
> 
> This patch changes the private is used to store inode, and the task
> struct will be gotten and putted in read or write function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>


Fine with me; Ingo please merge
Thanks for working on this!

-- 
If you want to reach me at my work email, use arjan@linux.intel.com
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] latencytop: fix kernel panic and memory leak on proc
  2008-02-15  0:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
@ 2008-02-15  1:13   ` Ingo Molnar
  2008-02-19 17:33     ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
  2008-02-21  0:53     ` [PATCH] latencytop: change /proc task_struct access method Hiroshi Shimamoto
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ingo Molnar @ 2008-02-15  1:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arjan van de Ven; +Cc: Hiroshi Shimamoto, linux-kernel


* Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:51:19 -0800
> Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I posted 2 patches to fix kernel panic and memory leak.
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/282
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/283
> > 
> > But, I think this patch is better than old ones.

thanks Hiroshi, applied.

	Ingo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] latencytop: fix kernel panic and memory leak on proc
  2008-02-15  1:13   ` Ingo Molnar
@ 2008-02-19 17:33     ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
  2008-02-21  0:53     ` [PATCH] latencytop: change /proc task_struct access method Hiroshi Shimamoto
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto @ 2008-02-19 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Arjan van de Ven, linux-kernel

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:51:19 -0800
>> Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I posted 2 patches to fix kernel panic and memory leak.
>>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/282
>>> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/283
>>>
>>> But, I think this patch is better than old ones.
> 
> thanks Hiroshi, applied.

Hi Ingo,

I'd like to be applied new patch for latencytop fix.
I think it better than old ptaches.

Can you apply this patch for latencytop issues?
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/14/451

It's replacement of old patches you applied.
It makes latency file behavior same as other proc files.
get_proc_task() and put_task_struct() are called at read time,
and returns -ESRCH if get_proc_task() failed.

If is there any problem, please let me know.

thanks,
Hiroshi Shimamoto

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] latencytop: change /proc task_struct access method
  2008-02-15  1:13   ` Ingo Molnar
  2008-02-19 17:33     ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
@ 2008-02-21  0:53     ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto @ 2008-02-21  0:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: Arjan van de Ven, linux-kernel

Hi Ingo,

Here is a delta patch against sched-devel.git tree.

These two patches in sched-devel.git tree fix the issues.
latencytop: fix kernel panic while reading latency proc file
latencytop: fix memory leak on latency proc file

However, this is more appropriate way to fix, I think.

---
From: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>

Change getting task_struct by get_proc_task() at read or write time,
and returns -ESRCH if get_proc_task() returns NULL.
This is same behavior as other /proc files.

Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>
---
 fs/proc/base.c |   40 ++++++++++++----------------------------
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 64661c3..bebf9a8 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -314,9 +314,12 @@ static int proc_pid_schedstat(struct task_struct *task, char *buffer)
 static int lstats_show_proc(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 {
 	int i;
-	struct task_struct *task = m->private;
-	seq_puts(m, "Latency Top version : v0.1\n");
+	struct inode *inode = m->private;
+	struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(inode);
 
+	if (!task)
+		return -ESRCH;
+	seq_puts(m, "Latency Top version : v0.1\n");
 	for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) {
 		if (task->latency_record[i].backtrace[0]) {
 			int q;
@@ -341,43 +344,24 @@ static int lstats_show_proc(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 		}
 
 	}
+	put_task_struct(task);
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static int lstats_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
 {
-	int ret;
-	struct seq_file *m;
-	struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(inode);
-
-	if (!task)
-		return -ENOENT;
-	ret = single_open(file, lstats_show_proc, NULL);
-	if (!ret) {
-		m = file->private_data;
-		m->private = task;
-	}
-	return ret;
-}
-
-static int lstats_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
-{
-	struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
-	struct task_struct *task = m->private;
-
-	put_task_struct(task);
-	return single_release(inode, file);
+	return single_open(file, lstats_show_proc, inode);
 }
 
 static ssize_t lstats_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 			    size_t count, loff_t *offs)
 {
-	struct seq_file *m;
-	struct task_struct *task;
+	struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(file->f_dentry->d_inode);
 
-	m = file->private_data;
-	task = m->private;
+	if (!task)
+		return -ESRCH;
 	clear_all_latency_tracing(task);
+	put_task_struct(task);
 
 	return count;
 }
@@ -387,7 +371,7 @@ static const struct file_operations proc_lstats_operations = {
 	.read		= seq_read,
 	.write		= lstats_write,
 	.llseek		= seq_lseek,
-	.release	= lstats_release,
+	.release	= single_release,
 };
 
 #endif
-- 
1.5.3.8


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-02-21  0:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-02-14 22:51 [PATCH] latencytop: fix kernel panic and memory leak on proc Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-02-15  0:42 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-02-15  1:13   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-19 17:33     ` Hiroshi Shimamoto
2008-02-21  0:53     ` [PATCH] latencytop: change /proc task_struct access method Hiroshi Shimamoto

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.