From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
andrew.grover@intel.com, paul.s.diefenbaugh@intel.com,
linux@brodo.de, anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com, lenb@kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] remove goto statement
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:22:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47BA3D6B.20804@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47BA39FA.7050102@redhat.com>
Glauber Costa wrote:
> Li Zefan wrote:
>> Glauber Costa 写道:
>>> This patch removes goto statements in favour of plain returns
>>> in places that had nothing left behind that would justify
>>> such construction
>>> ---
>>> drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
>>> index 06a230a..70f62b6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
>>> @@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ static int __cpuinit acpi_processor_star
>>>
>>> result = acpi_processor_add_fs(device);
>>> if (result)
>>> - goto end;
>>> + return result;
>>>
>>> status = acpi_install_notify_handler(pr->handle, ACPI_DEVICE_NOTIFY,
>>> acpi_processor_notify, pr);
>>> @@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ #endif
>>> "%s is registered as cooling_device%d\n",
>>> device->dev.bus_id, cdev->id);
>>> else
>>> - goto end;
>>> + return result;
>>>
>>> result = sysfs_create_link(&device->dev.kobj, &cdev->device.kobj,
>>> "thermal_cooling");
>> Seems you forgot to remove the 'end' label ?
> yes, in fact, thanks for pointing.
>
> However, the patches are as split up as I could do, and it should not
> affect the others. I can re send this one, the whole series, or
> whatever, depending on what the maintainer wants.
>
> So, what's gonna be?
>
IMO a revised [PATCH 4/4] will do, since it won't affect the other 3 patches :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Glauber Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
andrew.grover@intel.com, paul.s.diefenbaugh@intel.com,
linux@brodo.de, anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com, lenb@kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] remove goto statement
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:22:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47BA3D6B.20804@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <47BA39FA.7050102@redhat.com>
Glauber Costa wrote:
> Li Zefan wrote:
>> Glauber Costa 写道:
>>> This patch removes goto statements in favour of plain returns
>>> in places that had nothing left behind that would justify
>>> such construction
>>> ---
>>> drivers/acpi/processor_core.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
>>> index 06a230a..70f62b6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_core.c
>>> @@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ static int __cpuinit acpi_processor_star
>>>
>>> result = acpi_processor_add_fs(device);
>>> if (result)
>>> - goto end;
>>> + return result;
>>>
>>> status = acpi_install_notify_handler(pr->handle, ACPI_DEVICE_NOTIFY,
>>> acpi_processor_notify, pr);
>>> @@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ #endif
>>> "%s is registered as cooling_device%d\n",
>>> device->dev.bus_id, cdev->id);
>>> else
>>> - goto end;
>>> + return result;
>>>
>>> result = sysfs_create_link(&device->dev.kobj, &cdev->device.kobj,
>>> "thermal_cooling");
>> Seems you forgot to remove the 'end' label ?
> yes, in fact, thanks for pointing.
>
> However, the patches are as split up as I could do, and it should not
> affect the others. I can re send this one, the whole series, or
> whatever, depending on what the maintainer wants.
>
> So, what's gonna be?
>
IMO a revised [PATCH 4/4] will do, since it won't affect the other 3 patches :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-19 2:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-18 20:56 [PATCH 1/4] make cdev attribuition the last step Glauber Costa
2008-02-18 20:56 ` [PATCH 2/4] use pr->cdev as a condition for cleanup Glauber Costa
2008-02-18 20:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] provide error handling for unclean objects Glauber Costa
2008-02-18 20:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] remove goto statement Glauber Costa
2008-02-19 1:19 ` Li Zefan
2008-02-19 1:19 ` Li Zefan
2008-02-19 2:07 ` Glauber Costa
2008-02-19 2:07 ` Glauber Costa
2008-02-19 2:22 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2008-02-19 2:22 ` Li Zefan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47BA3D6B.20804@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew.grover@intel.com \
--cc=anil.s.keshavamurthy@intel.com \
--cc=gcosta@redhat.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@brodo.de \
--cc=paul.s.diefenbaugh@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.