Re: [kvm-ppc-devel] [kvm-devel] Top level kvm-userspace directory

[Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>]

Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>> It doesn't have to be a package; it can be as simple as a tarball that 
>> people have to make; && sudo make install before compiling kvm, the same 
>> as other prerequisite libraries.
>>     
>
> Sure. Let's put that tarball inside the qemu directory, and then have it
> extracted and built automatically when the user types "make".
>
> I'm really not clear on what advantage you think will be gained here.
>
>   

If the package never changes in kvm-specific ways, there is no point in 
including it in kvm. The user can install it once, just like they 
install the X devel packages (for example) which we don't carry in kvm 
either.

Is it indeed the case that no modifications are needed for kvm?

>> The barrier should be whether we need to carry local changes or not.  If 
>> we can use upstream as is, then it should be installed independently.
>>     
>
> So let me get this straight... you think it's cool to awk kernel source,
>   

Awking the kernel source is not done for the sheer pleasure of it. It is 
painful to maintain and I only do it out of necessity.

> but not to copy library code that was designed to be copied in the first
> place? Seriously? Would it be more palatable to you if I ran awk over
> arch/powerpc/boot/libdft?
>   

Including the source in kvm is of course preferable to awk, but less 
preferable to an external dependency.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
kvm-ppc-devel mailing list
kvm-ppc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-ppc-devel