From: Ric Wheeler <ric@emc.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
adilger@sun.com, David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>,
jack@ucw.cz
Cc: "Feld, Andy" <Feld_Andy@emc.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: background on the ext3 batching performance issue
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 07:09:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47C6A46D.8020700@emc.com> (raw)
At the LSF workshop, I mentioned that we have tripped across an
embarrassing performance issue in the jbd transaction code which is
clearly not tuned for low latency devices.
The short summary is that we can do say 800 10k files/sec in a
write/fsync/close loop with a single thread, but drop down to under 250
files/sec with 2 or more threads.
This is pretty easy to reproduce with any small file write synchronous
workload (i.e., fsync() each file before close). We used my fs_mark
tool to reproduce.
The core of the issue is the call in the jbd transaction code call out
to schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1) which causes us to sleep for 4ms:
pid = current->pid;
if (handle->h_sync && journal->j_last_sync_writer != pid) {
journal->j_last_sync_writer = pid;
do {
old_handle_count = transaction->t_handle_count;
schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
} while (old_handle_count != transaction->t_handle_count);
}
This is quite topical to the concern we had with low latency devices in
general, but specifically things like SSD's.
regards,
ric
next reply other threads:[~2008-02-28 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-28 12:09 Ric Wheeler [this message]
2008-02-28 15:05 ` background on the ext3 batching performance issue Josef Bacik
2008-02-28 15:41 ` Josef Bacik
2008-02-28 13:03 ` Ric Wheeler
2008-02-28 13:09 ` Ric Wheeler
2008-02-28 16:41 ` Jan Kara
2008-02-28 17:02 ` Chris Mason
2008-02-28 17:13 ` Jan Kara
2008-02-28 17:35 ` Chris Mason
2008-02-28 18:15 ` Jan Kara
2008-02-28 17:54 ` David Chinner
2008-02-28 19:48 ` Ric Wheeler
2008-02-29 14:52 ` Ric Wheeler
2008-03-05 19:19 ` some hard numbers on ext3 & " Ric Wheeler
2008-03-05 20:20 ` Josef Bacik
2008-03-07 20:08 ` Ric Wheeler
2008-03-07 20:40 ` Josef Bacik
2008-03-07 20:45 ` Ric Wheeler
2008-03-12 18:37 ` Josef Bacik
2008-03-13 11:26 ` Ric Wheeler
2008-03-06 0:28 ` David Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47C6A46D.8020700@emc.com \
--to=ric@emc.com \
--cc=Feld_Andy@emc.com \
--cc=adilger@sun.com \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=jack@ucw.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.