From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, tglx@linutronix.de,
oleg@tv-sign.ru, rostedt@goodmis.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/4] CPUSET driven CPU isolation
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:26:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47C718DE.9020107@qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080228141339.b83ae00f.pj@sgi.com>
Paul Jackson wrote:
> Max K wrote:
>> I like the concept of the "boot" set. But we still need a separate "system"
>> flag. Users should not have to move cpu back into the "boot" set to allow for
>> kernel (irqs, etc) activity on it. And it's just more explicit and clear that way.
>
> Good point -- a "boot" cpuset might be 4 CPUs out of 256 CPUs, just for running
> the classic Unix load (daemons, init, login, ...). But irq's might need to go
> to most CPUs, except for some (dare I use the word) isolated CPUs.
>
btw Can you send me those init scripts that you mentioned. ie Those that
create "boot" set from userspace.
Max
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-28 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-27 22:21 [RFC/PATCH 0/4] CPUSET driven CPU isolation Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-27 22:21 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/4] sched: remove isolcpus Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-27 23:57 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-02-28 10:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-28 19:36 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-02-27 22:21 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/4] cpuset: system sets Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-27 23:39 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-28 1:53 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-02-27 23:52 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-02-28 0:11 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-28 0:29 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-02-28 1:45 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-02-28 3:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2008-02-28 4:58 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-02-27 22:21 ` [RFC/PATCH 3/4] genirq: system set irq affinities Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-28 0:10 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-02-28 10:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-27 22:21 ` [RFC/PATCH 4/4] kthread: system set kthread affinities Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-27 23:38 ` [RFC/PATCH 0/4] CPUSET driven CPU isolation Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-02-28 10:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-28 17:33 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-02-28 7:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-28 8:08 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-28 9:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-28 9:17 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-28 9:32 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-28 10:12 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-28 10:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-28 17:37 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-28 21:24 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-28 22:46 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-28 23:00 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-29 0:16 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-29 1:05 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-29 3:34 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-29 4:00 ` David Rientjes
2008-02-29 6:53 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-28 10:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-28 17:47 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-28 20:11 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-02-28 20:13 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-28 20:26 ` Max Krasnyansky [this message]
2008-02-28 20:27 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-28 20:45 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-02-28 20:23 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-02-28 17:48 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-02-29 8:31 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-29 8:36 ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-29 9:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-29 18:06 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-02-28 12:12 ` Mark Hounschell
2008-02-28 19:57 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-02-29 18:55 ` [RFC/PATCH] cpuset: cpuset irq affinities Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-29 19:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-29 20:52 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-02-29 21:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-29 21:20 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-03-03 11:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-03 17:36 ` Paul Jackson
2008-03-03 17:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-03 18:10 ` Paul Jackson
2008-03-03 18:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-04 7:35 ` Paul Jackson
2008-03-04 11:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-04 19:52 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-03-05 1:11 ` Paul Jackson
2008-03-05 8:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-05 8:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-05 12:35 ` Paul Jackson
2008-03-05 12:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-05 17:44 ` Paul Jackson
2008-03-05 19:17 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-03-06 13:47 ` Paul Jackson
2008-03-06 15:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-03-07 3:40 ` Paul Jackson
2008-03-07 6:39 ` Paul Jackson
2008-03-07 8:47 ` Paul Menage
2008-03-07 14:57 ` Paul Jackson
2008-03-03 18:41 ` Paul Menage
2008-03-03 18:52 ` Paul Jackson
2008-03-04 5:26 ` Paul Menage
2008-03-04 6:15 ` Paul Jackson
2008-03-04 6:21 ` Paul Menage
2008-03-04 6:26 ` Paul Jackson
2008-03-04 6:34 ` Paul Menage
2008-03-04 6:51 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-29 20:55 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-29 21:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-02-29 21:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-29 21:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-02-29 21:42 ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-02-29 22:00 ` Paul Jackson
2008-02-29 21:53 ` Paul Jackson
2008-03-02 5:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47C718DE.9020107@qualcomm.com \
--to=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.