* V4L2: __ucmpdi2 undefined on ppc @ 2006-12-13 12:11 Meelis Roos 2006-12-13 12:59 ` Paweł Sikora 2006-12-13 23:41 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Meelis Roos @ 2006-12-13 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel list MODPOST 618 modules WARNING: "__ucmpdi2" [drivers/media/video/v4l2-common.ko] undefined! This 32-bit ppc architecture, using gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21). .config below if important. __ucmpdi2 seems to be 64-bit comparision. gcc seems to use it for switch statements on 64-bit values. drivers/media/video/v4l2-common.c::v4l2_norm_to_name seems to be one such switch statement - type of id is v4l2_std_id which is 64-bit. Should ppc have __ucmpdi2 defined in arch-specific lib? Some other architectures seem to implement it (arm, arm26, frv, h8300). -- Meelis Roos (mroos@linux.ee) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: V4L2: __ucmpdi2 undefined on ppc 2006-12-13 12:11 V4L2: __ucmpdi2 undefined on ppc Meelis Roos @ 2006-12-13 12:59 ` Paweł Sikora 2006-12-13 23:41 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Paweł Sikora @ 2006-12-13 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Meelis Roos; +Cc: Linux Kernel list Meelis Roos napisał(a): > MODPOST 618 modules > WARNING: "__ucmpdi2" [drivers/media/video/v4l2-common.ko] undefined! > > This 32-bit ppc architecture, using gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 > (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21). .config below if important. > > __ucmpdi2 seems to be 64-bit comparision. gcc seems to use it for switch > statements on 64-bit values. > > drivers/media/video/v4l2-common.c::v4l2_norm_to_name seems to be one > such switch statement - type of id is v4l2_std_id which is 64-bit. > > Should ppc have __ucmpdi2 defined in arch-specific lib? Some other > architectures seem to implement it (arm, arm26, frv, h8300). maybe it's new gcc bug. [ already fixed ] http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21237 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25724 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: V4L2: __ucmpdi2 undefined on ppc 2006-12-13 12:11 V4L2: __ucmpdi2 undefined on ppc Meelis Roos 2006-12-13 12:59 ` Paweł Sikora @ 2006-12-13 23:41 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2006-12-14 19:58 ` Kyle McMartin 1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab @ 2006-12-13 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Meelis Roos; +Cc: Linux Kernel list Em Qua, 2006-12-13 às 14:11 +0200, Meelis Roos escreveu: > MODPOST 618 modules > WARNING: "__ucmpdi2" [drivers/media/video/v4l2-common.ko] undefined! > > This 32-bit ppc architecture, using gcc version 4.1.2 20061115 > (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21). .config below if important. Hmm... does it work with gcc 4.0? > > __ucmpdi2 seems to be 64-bit comparision. gcc seems to use it for switch > statements on 64-bit values. Argh! if this is caused by switch / ifs, compilation will fail on other places. Cheers, Mauro. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: V4L2: __ucmpdi2 undefined on ppc 2006-12-13 23:41 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab @ 2006-12-14 19:58 ` Kyle McMartin 2006-12-16 18:15 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2006-12-17 13:29 ` David Woodhouse 0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Kyle McMartin @ 2006-12-14 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab; +Cc: Meelis Roos, Linux Kernel list On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 09:41:56PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Argh! if this is caused by switch / ifs, compilation will fail on other > places. > I posted a patch to Paul this week to fix this, as saw we saw it on Ubuntu's powerpc kernel builds. Since ppc32 can't do a 64bit comparison on its own it seems, gcc will generate a call to a helper function from libgcc. What other arches do is link libgcc.a into libs-y, and export the symbol they want from it. The build process will discard the rest of the .a that is unused. parisc uses this method, for example. Gcc targets can provide optimized versions of these helpers in assembly, but at least in this case, the generic C version seems to be used everywhere. It might be useful to provide kernel local copies of these C versions linked __weak or something if the arch happens to need them. (Not going to sign off or anything, since I've already sent it to paulus@ and I don't want it to get merged without his approval...) Cheers, Kyle --- diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/Makefile index a00fe72..5b60c05 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/Makefile +++ b/arch/powerpc/Makefile @@ -139,6 +139,8 @@ core-$(CONFIG_XMON) += arch/powerpc/xmon/ drivers-$(CONFIG_OPROFILE) += arch/powerpc/oprofile/ +libs-y += `$(CC) -print-libgcc-file-name` + # Default to zImage, override when needed defaultimage-y := zImage defaultimage-$(CONFIG_PPC_ISERIES) := vmlinux diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c index 9179f07..dea8384 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c @@ -164,6 +164,9 @@ long long __lshrdi3(long long, int); EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ashrdi3); EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ashldi3); EXPORT_SYMBOL(__lshrdi3); + +extern void __ucmpdi2(void); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ucmpdi2); #endif EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcpy); ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: V4L2: __ucmpdi2 undefined on ppc 2006-12-14 19:58 ` Kyle McMartin @ 2006-12-16 18:15 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2006-12-17 13:29 ` David Woodhouse 1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab @ 2006-12-16 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kyle McMartin; +Cc: Meelis Roos, Linux Kernel list > I posted a patch to Paul this week to fix this, as saw we saw it on > Ubuntu's powerpc kernel builds. > > Since ppc32 can't do a 64bit comparison on its own it seems, gcc > will generate a call to a helper function from libgcc. What other > arches do is link libgcc.a into libs-y, and export the symbol > they want from it. The build process will discard the rest of the > .a that is unused. parisc uses this method, for example. > > Gcc targets can provide optimized versions of these helpers in > assembly, but at least in this case, the generic C version seems > to be used everywhere. It might be useful to provide kernel local > copies of these C versions linked __weak or something if the > arch happens to need them. > > (Not going to sign off or anything, since I've already sent it to > paulus@ and I don't want it to get merged without his approval...) Seems to be a good way to solve it. > --- > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/Makefile > index a00fe72..5b60c05 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/Makefile > +++ b/arch/powerpc/Makefile > @@ -139,6 +139,8 @@ core-$(CONFIG_XMON) += arch/powerpc/xmon/ > > drivers-$(CONFIG_OPROFILE) += arch/powerpc/oprofile/ > > +libs-y += `$(CC) -print-libgcc-file-name` > + > # Default to zImage, override when needed > defaultimage-y := zImage > defaultimage-$(CONFIG_PPC_ISERIES) := vmlinux > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c > index 9179f07..dea8384 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c > @@ -164,6 +164,9 @@ long long __lshrdi3(long long, int); > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ashrdi3); > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ashldi3); > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__lshrdi3); > + > +extern void __ucmpdi2(void); > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ucmpdi2); > #endif > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcpy); > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ Cheers, Mauro. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: V4L2: __ucmpdi2 undefined on ppc 2006-12-14 19:58 ` Kyle McMartin @ 2006-12-17 13:29 ` David Woodhouse 2006-12-17 13:29 ` David Woodhouse 1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: David Woodhouse @ 2006-12-17 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kyle McMartin Cc: linuxppc-dev, Meelis Roos, paulus, Linux Kernel list, Mauro Carvalho Chehab On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 14:58 -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote: > I posted a patch to Paul this week to fix this, Hm, I didn't see it on linuxppc-dev. > Since ppc32 can't do a 64bit comparison on its own it seems, gcc > will generate a call to a helper function from libgcc. What other > arches do is link libgcc.a into libs-y, and export the symbol > they want from it. You still get to 'accidentally' do 64-bit arithmetic in-kernel that way though. Might be better just to provide __ucmpdi2, just as we have for the other functions which are required from libgcc It'd be better just to fix the compiler though -- which is in fact what they've done: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25724 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21237 I've applied this as a temporary hack to the Fedora kernel until the compiler is updated there... --- linux-2.6.19.ppc/arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S~ 2006-11-29 21:57:37.000000000 +0000 +++ linux-2.6.19.ppc/arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S 2006-12-17 12:19:48.000000000 +0000 @@ -728,6 +728,27 @@ _GLOBAL(__lshrdi3) or r4,r4,r7 # LSW |= t2 blr +/* + * __ucmpdi2: 64-bit comparison + * + * R3/R4 has 64 bit value A + * R5/R6 has 64 bit value B + * result in R3: 0 for A < B + * 1 for A == B + * 2 for A > B + */ +_GLOBAL(__ucmpdi2) + cmplw r7,r3,r5 # compare high words + li r3,0 + blt r7,2f # a < b ... return 0 + bgt r7,1f # a > b ... return 2 + cmplw r6,r4,r6 # compare low words + blt r6,2f # a < b ... return 0 + li r3,1 + ble r6,2f # a = b ... return 1 +1: li r3,2 +2: blr + _GLOBAL(abs) srawi r4,r3,31 xor r3,r3,r4 --- linux-2.6.19.ppc/arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c~ 2006-12-15 17:19:56.000000000 +0000 +++ linux-2.6.19.ppc/arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c 2006-12-17 12:16:54.000000000 +0000 @@ -161,9 +161,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(to_tm); long long __ashrdi3(long long, int); long long __ashldi3(long long, int); long long __lshrdi3(long long, int); +int __ucmpdi2(uint64_t, uint64_t); EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ashrdi3); EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ashldi3); EXPORT_SYMBOL(__lshrdi3); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ucmpdi2); #endif EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcpy); -- dwmw2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: V4L2: __ucmpdi2 undefined on ppc @ 2006-12-17 13:29 ` David Woodhouse 0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: David Woodhouse @ 2006-12-17 13:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kyle McMartin Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab, Meelis Roos, Linux Kernel list, linuxppc-dev, paulus On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 14:58 -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote: > I posted a patch to Paul this week to fix this, Hm, I didn't see it on linuxppc-dev. > Since ppc32 can't do a 64bit comparison on its own it seems, gcc > will generate a call to a helper function from libgcc. What other > arches do is link libgcc.a into libs-y, and export the symbol > they want from it. You still get to 'accidentally' do 64-bit arithmetic in-kernel that way though. Might be better just to provide __ucmpdi2, just as we have for the other functions which are required from libgcc It'd be better just to fix the compiler though -- which is in fact what they've done: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25724 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21237 I've applied this as a temporary hack to the Fedora kernel until the compiler is updated there... --- linux-2.6.19.ppc/arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S~ 2006-11-29 21:57:37.000000000 +0000 +++ linux-2.6.19.ppc/arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S 2006-12-17 12:19:48.000000000 +0000 @@ -728,6 +728,27 @@ _GLOBAL(__lshrdi3) or r4,r4,r7 # LSW |= t2 blr +/* + * __ucmpdi2: 64-bit comparison + * + * R3/R4 has 64 bit value A + * R5/R6 has 64 bit value B + * result in R3: 0 for A < B + * 1 for A == B + * 2 for A > B + */ +_GLOBAL(__ucmpdi2) + cmplw r7,r3,r5 # compare high words + li r3,0 + blt r7,2f # a < b ... return 0 + bgt r7,1f # a > b ... return 2 + cmplw r6,r4,r6 # compare low words + blt r6,2f # a < b ... return 0 + li r3,1 + ble r6,2f # a = b ... return 1 +1: li r3,2 +2: blr + _GLOBAL(abs) srawi r4,r3,31 xor r3,r3,r4 --- linux-2.6.19.ppc/arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c~ 2006-12-15 17:19:56.000000000 +0000 +++ linux-2.6.19.ppc/arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c 2006-12-17 12:16:54.000000000 +0000 @@ -161,9 +161,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(to_tm); long long __ashrdi3(long long, int); long long __ashldi3(long long, int); long long __lshrdi3(long long, int); +int __ucmpdi2(uint64_t, uint64_t); EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ashrdi3); EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ashldi3); EXPORT_SYMBOL(__lshrdi3); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ucmpdi2); #endif EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcpy); -- dwmw2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: V4L2: __ucmpdi2 undefined on ppc 2006-12-17 13:29 ` David Woodhouse (?) @ 2008-02-06 14:39 ` Stephane Marchesin 2008-03-02 18:48 ` Stephane Marchesin 2008-03-02 21:53 ` Segher Boessenkool -1 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Stephane Marchesin @ 2008-02-06 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: henrik.sorensen, David Woodhouse, paulus On 12/17/06, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote: > > You still get to 'accidentally' do 64-bit arithmetic in-kernel that way > though. Might be better just to provide __ucmpdi2, just as we have for > the other functions which are required from libgcc > > It'd be better just to fix the compiler though -- which is in fact what > they've done: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25724 > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21237 > > I've applied this as a temporary hack to the Fedora kernel until the > compiler is updated there... > Hello, We're hitting this i nouveau as well (http://nouveau.freedesktop.org), since we make extensive use ot 64 bit ints. Over time, we've had a number of reports on this issue, and at one point I read that it should be fixed in gcc. But recently, a nouveau user on PPC32 (Henrik in CC:) reported the issue again with gcc 4.2.3. Others have it on gcc 4.2.2 too: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10547 So, the point of this email is to ask about the possibility of merging in one of the __ucmpdi2 patches, like David's which is kept below for reference. Most distros seem to ship with such a patch already, and it seems that other drivers hit this as well. Thanks, Stephane > --- linux-2.6.19.ppc/arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S~ 2006-11-29 21:57:37.000000000 +0000 > +++ linux-2.6.19.ppc/arch/powerpc/kernel/misc_32.S 2006-12-17 12:19:48.000000000 +0000 > @@ -728,6 +728,27 @@ _GLOBAL(__lshrdi3) > or r4,r4,r7 # LSW |= t2 > blr > > +/* > + * __ucmpdi2: 64-bit comparison > + * > + * R3/R4 has 64 bit value A > + * R5/R6 has 64 bit value B > + * result in R3: 0 for A < B > + * 1 for A == B > + * 2 for A > B > + */ > +_GLOBAL(__ucmpdi2) > + cmplw r7,r3,r5 # compare high words > + li r3,0 > + blt r7,2f # a < b ... return 0 > + bgt r7,1f # a > b ... return 2 > + cmplw r6,r4,r6 # compare low words > + blt r6,2f # a < b ... return 0 > + li r3,1 > + ble r6,2f # a = b ... return 1 > +1: li r3,2 > +2: blr > + > _GLOBAL(abs) > srawi r4,r3,31 > xor r3,r3,r4 > --- linux-2.6.19.ppc/arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c~ 2006-12-15 17:19:56.000000000 +0000 > +++ linux-2.6.19.ppc/arch/powerpc/kernel/ppc_ksyms.c 2006-12-17 12:16:54.000000000 +0000 > @@ -161,9 +161,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(to_tm); > long long __ashrdi3(long long, int); > long long __ashldi3(long long, int); > long long __lshrdi3(long long, int); > +int __ucmpdi2(uint64_t, uint64_t); > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ashrdi3); > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ashldi3); > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__lshrdi3); > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__ucmpdi2); > #endif > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(memcpy); > > -- > dwmw2 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: V4L2: __ucmpdi2 undefined on ppc 2008-02-06 14:39 ` Stephane Marchesin @ 2008-03-02 18:48 ` Stephane Marchesin 2008-03-02 21:53 ` Segher Boessenkool 1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Stephane Marchesin @ 2008-03-02 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linuxppc-dev, David Woodhouse, benh, paulus, henrik.sorensen, linux-kernel On 2/6/08, Stephane Marchesin <marchesin@icps.u-strasbg.fr> wrote: > > We're hitting this i nouveau as well (http://nouveau.freedesktop.org), > since we make extensive use ot 64 bit ints. Over time, we've had a > number of reports on this issue, and at one point I read that it > should be fixed in gcc. But recently, a nouveau user on PPC32 (Henrik > in CC:) reported the issue again with gcc 4.2.3. Others have it on gcc > 4.2.2 too: > http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10547 > > So, the point of this email is to ask about the possibility of merging > in one of the __ucmpdi2 patches, like David's which is kept below for > reference. Most distros seem to ship with such a patch already, and it > seems that other drivers hit this as well. > So, could we have that thing in main tree ? It's not like it's untested, most distros carry that, and a couple of arches provide their own ucmpdi2 implementation already. It's also such a small function... Stephane ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: V4L2: __ucmpdi2 undefined on ppc 2008-02-06 14:39 ` Stephane Marchesin 2008-03-02 18:48 ` Stephane Marchesin @ 2008-03-02 21:53 ` Segher Boessenkool 2008-03-04 16:37 ` David Woodhouse 2008-03-04 21:44 ` Paul Mackerras 1 sibling, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Segher Boessenkool @ 2008-03-02 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephane Marchesin; +Cc: linuxppc-dev, henrik.sorensen, paulus, David Woodhouse >> +/* >> + * __ucmpdi2: 64-bit comparison >> + * >> + * R3/R4 has 64 bit value A >> + * R5/R6 has 64 bit value B >> + * result in R3: 0 for A < B >> + * 1 for A == B >> + * 2 for A > B >> + */ >> +_GLOBAL(__ucmpdi2) >> + cmplw r7,r3,r5 # compare high words >> + li r3,0 >> + blt r7,2f # a < b ... return 0 >> + bgt r7,1f # a > b ... return 2 >> + cmplw r6,r4,r6 # compare low words >> + blt r6,2f # a < b ... return 0 >> + li r3,1 >> + ble r6,2f # a = b ... return 1 >> +1: li r3,2 >> +2: blr Every occurrence of r7 here is wrong (and some of the r6). Is there any reason to do this in assembler code at all? Segher ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: V4L2: __ucmpdi2 undefined on ppc 2008-03-02 21:53 ` Segher Boessenkool @ 2008-03-04 16:37 ` David Woodhouse 2008-03-04 16:58 ` Scott Wood 2008-03-04 20:32 ` Segher Boessenkool 2008-03-04 21:44 ` Paul Mackerras 1 sibling, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: David Woodhouse @ 2008-03-04 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Segher Boessenkool Cc: paulus, henrik.sorensen, Stephane Marchesin, linuxppc-dev On Sun, 2008-03-02 at 22:53 +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Every occurrence of r7 here is wrong (and some of the r6). Can you elucidate? > Is there any reason to do this in assembler code at all? Is there any particular reason not to? -- dwmw2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: V4L2: __ucmpdi2 undefined on ppc 2008-03-04 16:37 ` David Woodhouse @ 2008-03-04 16:58 ` Scott Wood 2008-03-04 20:32 ` Segher Boessenkool 1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Scott Wood @ 2008-03-04 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Woodhouse; +Cc: Stephane Marchesin, henrik.sorensen, paulus, linuxppc-dev On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 04:37:28PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Sun, 2008-03-02 at 22:53 +0100, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > Every occurrence of r7 here is wrong (and some of the r6). > > Can you elucidate? They were being used as condition registers rather than GPRs. > > Is there any reason to do this in assembler code at all? > > Is there any particular reason not to? Same reason most of the rest of the kernel is in C rather than assembly. Of course, a better question is why we don't just link libgcc... -Scott ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: V4L2: __ucmpdi2 undefined on ppc 2008-03-04 16:37 ` David Woodhouse 2008-03-04 16:58 ` Scott Wood @ 2008-03-04 20:32 ` Segher Boessenkool 1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Segher Boessenkool @ 2008-03-04 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Woodhouse; +Cc: paulus, henrik.sorensen, Stephane Marchesin, linuxppc-dev >> Every occurrence of r7 here is wrong (and some of the r6). > > Can you elucidate? Sure! It should read either "7" or "cr7". >> Is there any reason to do this in assembler code at all? > > Is there any particular reason not to? 1) If written in assembler, it needs to be written for every architecture separately, and sometimes even for every architecture variant (32 vs. 64 bit is only the tip of the iceberg). 2) As shown here as well as in the recent strncmp() patch, it is a lot harder to write correct assembler code than it is to write correct C code(*), and the C code isn't less efficient either. Segher (*) Well, the generic C strncmp() code in the kernel is broken too, bad example perhaps :-) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: V4L2: __ucmpdi2 undefined on ppc 2008-03-02 21:53 ` Segher Boessenkool 2008-03-04 16:37 ` David Woodhouse @ 2008-03-04 21:44 ` Paul Mackerras 2008-03-04 21:47 ` Scott Wood 2008-03-04 22:43 ` Segher Boessenkool 1 sibling, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Paul Mackerras @ 2008-03-04 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Segher Boessenkool Cc: linuxppc-dev, henrik.sorensen, Stephane Marchesin, David Woodhouse Segher Boessenkool writes: > Every occurrence of r7 here is wrong (and some of the r6). Is there > any reason to do this in assembler code at all? The fact that the obvious C code generates ... a call to __ucmpdi2? :) Paul. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: V4L2: __ucmpdi2 undefined on ppc 2008-03-04 21:44 ` Paul Mackerras @ 2008-03-04 21:47 ` Scott Wood 2008-03-04 22:43 ` Segher Boessenkool 1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Scott Wood @ 2008-03-04 21:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Mackerras Cc: linuxppc-dev, henrik.sorensen, Stephane Marchesin, David Woodhouse Paul Mackerras wrote: > Segher Boessenkool writes: > >> Every occurrence of r7 here is wrong (and some of the r6). Is there >> any reason to do this in assembler code at all? > > The fact that the obvious C code generates ... a call to __ucmpdi2? :) So use the correct C code, not the obvious C code. :-) -Scott ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: V4L2: __ucmpdi2 undefined on ppc 2008-03-04 21:44 ` Paul Mackerras 2008-03-04 21:47 ` Scott Wood @ 2008-03-04 22:43 ` Segher Boessenkool 1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread From: Segher Boessenkool @ 2008-03-04 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Paul Mackerras Cc: linuxppc-dev, henrik.sorensen, Stephane Marchesin, David Woodhouse >> Every occurrence of r7 here is wrong (and some of the r6). Is there >> any reason to do this in assembler code at all? > > The fact that the obvious C code generates ... a call to __ucmpdi2? :) Hrm? Here's the "obvious" C code, portable to all architectures (modulo the specific types used, this isn't a proposed patch): unsigned int ucmpdi2(unsigned long long a, unsigned long long b) { unsigned long ahi, bhi, alo, blo; ahi = a >> 32; bhi = b >> 32; if (ahi < bhi) return 0; if (ahi > bhi) return 2; alo = a; blo = b; if (alo < blo) return 0; if (alo > blo) return 2; return 1; } (libgcc does it a bit differently, with unions and stuff). Segher ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-03-04 22:43 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2006-12-13 12:11 V4L2: __ucmpdi2 undefined on ppc Meelis Roos 2006-12-13 12:59 ` Paweł Sikora 2006-12-13 23:41 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2006-12-14 19:58 ` Kyle McMartin 2006-12-16 18:15 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2006-12-17 13:29 ` David Woodhouse 2006-12-17 13:29 ` David Woodhouse 2008-02-06 14:39 ` Stephane Marchesin 2008-03-02 18:48 ` Stephane Marchesin 2008-03-02 21:53 ` Segher Boessenkool 2008-03-04 16:37 ` David Woodhouse 2008-03-04 16:58 ` Scott Wood 2008-03-04 20:32 ` Segher Boessenkool 2008-03-04 21:44 ` Paul Mackerras 2008-03-04 21:47 ` Scott Wood 2008-03-04 22:43 ` Segher Boessenkool
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.