* [lm-sensors] No sensors found >2.6.21, w83627hf, ICH6
@ 2008-03-04 14:24 Stefan Sassenberg
2008-03-04 15:00 ` Jean Delvare
` (9 more replies)
0 siblings, 10 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Sassenberg @ 2008-03-04 14:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hello,
I have a problem making lm-sensors work on my system. It's a slightly
old debian where I updated some packages and now use sensors and
libsensors of version 2.9.1. I used to run a 2.6.21 kernel where sensors
finds some chip and also shows fan speed and temperature values.
Then I upgraded the kernel to a 2.6.23 and always get the error message
"No sensors found". The board is an MSI board and it has an 82801 ICH6
chipset.
sensors-detect advises me to modprobe w83627hf, which I do, but the
result is the above.
I installed a gentoo on the same machine, where it worked, and made an
lsmod, which showed w83627hf, hwmod and hwmon_vid. I took the kernel
config file and applied it to the kernel from kernel.org to build the
same kernel for my debian. I modprobed the very same modules but failed.
What can I do to find the solution?
Thank you.
Stefan
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] No sensors found >2.6.21, w83627hf, ICH6
2008-03-04 14:24 [lm-sensors] No sensors found >2.6.21, w83627hf, ICH6 Stefan Sassenberg
@ 2008-03-04 15:00 ` Jean Delvare
2008-03-05 10:31 ` Stefan Sassenberg
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2008-03-04 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hi Stefan,
On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:24:09 +0100, Stefan Sassenberg wrote:
> I have a problem making lm-sensors work on my system. It's a slightly
> old debian where I updated some packages and now use sensors and
> libsensors of version 2.9.1. I used to run a 2.6.21 kernel where sensors
> finds some chip and also shows fan speed and temperature values.
"some chip" doesn't tell us much... Can you please provide the complete
output of "sensors"?
> Then I upgraded the kernel to a 2.6.23 and always get the error message
> "No sensors found". The board is an MSI board and it has an 82801 ICH6
> chipset.
What is the exact motherboard model?
> sensors-detect advises me to modprobe w83627hf, which I do, but the
> result is the above.
Any message in the kernel logs when you modprobe w83627hf? Does the
modprobe itself fail or succeed? If it fails, what's the error message?
> I installed a gentoo on the same machine, where it worked, and made an
> lsmod, which showed w83627hf, hwmod and hwmon_vid. I took the kernel
> config file and applied it to the kernel from kernel.org to build the
> same kernel for my debian. I modprobed the very same modules but failed.
What kernel is your gentoo system running?
> What can I do to find the solution?
Please compare /proc/ioports between a system where the w83627hf driver
works for you and a system where it doesn't. I'd suspect a resource
conflict.
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] No sensors found >2.6.21, w83627hf, ICH6
2008-03-04 14:24 [lm-sensors] No sensors found >2.6.21, w83627hf, ICH6 Stefan Sassenberg
2008-03-04 15:00 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2008-03-05 10:31 ` Stefan Sassenberg
2008-03-05 14:28 ` Jean Delvare
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Sassenberg @ 2008-03-05 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Stefan,
>
> On Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:24:09 +0100, Stefan Sassenberg wrote:
>> I have a problem making lm-sensors work on my system. It's a slightly
>> old debian where I updated some packages and now use sensors and
>> libsensors of version 2.9.1. I used to run a 2.6.21 kernel where sensors
>> finds some chip and also shows fan speed and temperature values.
>
> "some chip" doesn't tell us much... Can you please provide the complete
> output of "sensors"?
w83627thf-isa-0290
Adapter: ISA adapter
VCore: +1.24 V (min = +0.70 V, max = +1.87 V)
+12V: +11.98 V (min = +6.51 V, max = +9.18 V) ALARM
+3.3V: +3.38 V (min = +0.26 V, max = +0.19 V) ALARM
+5V: +5.04 V (min = +2.72 V, max = +3.28 V) ALARM
-12V: -12.20 V (min = +3.27 V, max = -14.75 V) ALARM
V5SB: +5.05 V (min = +4.27 V, max = +1.61 V) ALARM
VBat: +3.22 V (min = +3.04 V, max = +3.92 V)
fan1: 0 RPM (min = 1035 RPM, div = 8) ALARM
CPU Fan: 0 RPM (min = 1171 RPM, div = 8) ALARM
fan3: 0 RPM (min = 3183 RPM, div = 8) ALARM
M/B Temp: -48°C (high = +29°C, hyst = +14°C) sensor =
thermistor
CPU Temp: +108.5°C (high = +120°C, hyst = +115°C) sensor = diode
temp3: -48.0°C (high = +120°C, hyst = +115°C) sensor =
thermistor
alarms: Chassis intrusion detection ALARM
beep_enable:
Sound alarm enabled
The values are nonsens, of course, but I wanted to do first things first.
>
>> Then I upgraded the kernel to a 2.6.23 and always get the error message
>> "No sensors found". The board is an MSI board and it has an 82801 ICH6
>> chipset.
>
> What is the exact motherboard model?
"Hetis 915 A7137IMS V1.3 02/10/06"
>
>> sensors-detect advises me to modprobe w83627hf, which I do, but the
>> result is the above.
>
> Any message in the kernel logs when you modprobe w83627hf? Does the
> modprobe itself fail or succeed? If it fails, what's the error message?
When I modprobe, a line is added to /var/log/dmesg:
w83627hf: Found W83627THF chip at 0x290
There's no message on stdout or stderr.
>
>> I installed a gentoo on the same machine, where it worked, and made an
>> lsmod, which showed w83627hf, hwmod and hwmon_vid. I took the kernel
>> config file and applied it to the kernel from kernel.org to build the
>> same kernel for my debian. I modprobed the very same modules but failed.
>
> What kernel is your gentoo system running?
2.6.23-r9 (the latest "not-masked" 2.6.23)
>
>> What can I do to find the solution?
>
> Please compare /proc/ioports between a system where the w83627hf driver
> works for you and a system where it doesn't. I'd suspect a resource
> conflict.
Using the 2.6.21.5 kernel:
0295-0296 : pnp 00:09
0295-0296 : w83627hf
Using the 2.6.23.14 kernel:
Before modprobing:
...
0295-0296 : pnp 00:09
...
After modprobing:
...
0295-0296 : w83627hf
0295-0296 : pnp 00:09
0295-0296 : w83627hf
...
Stefan
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] No sensors found >2.6.21, w83627hf, ICH6
2008-03-04 14:24 [lm-sensors] No sensors found >2.6.21, w83627hf, ICH6 Stefan Sassenberg
2008-03-04 15:00 ` Jean Delvare
2008-03-05 10:31 ` Stefan Sassenberg
@ 2008-03-05 14:28 ` Jean Delvare
2008-03-05 14:57 ` Stefan Sassenberg
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2008-03-05 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:31:30 +0100, Stefan Sassenberg wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
> > Any message in the kernel logs when you modprobe w83627hf? Does the
> > modprobe itself fail or succeed? If it fails, what's the error message?
>
> When I modprobe, a line is added to /var/log/dmesg:
> w83627hf: Found W83627THF chip at 0x290
> There's no message on stdout or stderr.
So the kernel itself seems to be happy...
> (...)
> > Please compare /proc/ioports between a system where the w83627hf driver
> > works for you and a system where it doesn't. I'd suspect a resource
> > conflict.
> Using the 2.6.21.5 kernel:
> 0295-0296 : pnp 00:09
> 0295-0296 : w83627hf
>
> Using the 2.6.23.14 kernel:
> Before modprobing:
> ...
> 0295-0296 : pnp 00:09
> ...
>
> After modprobing:
> ...
> 0295-0296 : w83627hf
> 0295-0296 : pnp 00:09
> 0295-0296 : w83627hf
> ...
And this looks OK as well. My first guess was wrong, let me suggest
something else...
I didn't notice at first but you wrote you were using lm-sensors 2.9.1.
That's pretty old. In kernel 2.6.22 the w83627hf driver was converted
from an i2c-isa driver to a platform driver (together with many other
hwmon driver, as we were finally getting rid of i2c-isa.) Support for
platform drivers was added to lm-sensors only in 2.10.0. So, no
surprise it doesn't work for you. For a kernel >= 2.6.22, I would even
recommend lm-sensors >= 2.10.3.
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] No sensors found >2.6.21, w83627hf, ICH6
2008-03-04 14:24 [lm-sensors] No sensors found >2.6.21, w83627hf, ICH6 Stefan Sassenberg
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-03-05 14:28 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2008-03-05 14:57 ` Stefan Sassenberg
2008-03-05 15:04 ` Jean Delvare
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Sassenberg @ 2008-03-05 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:31:30 +0100, Stefan Sassenberg wrote:
>> Jean Delvare wrote:
>
> I didn't notice at first but you wrote you were using lm-sensors 2.9.1.
> That's pretty old. In kernel 2.6.22 the w83627hf driver was converted
> from an i2c-isa driver to a platform driver (together with many other
> hwmon driver, as we were finally getting rid of i2c-isa.) Support for
> platform drivers was added to lm-sensors only in 2.10.0. So, no
> surprise it doesn't work for you. For a kernel >= 2.6.22, I would even
> recommend lm-sensors >= 2.10.3.
>
Very good. I could download deb packages of version 2.10.1. The next
version is 2.10.5 but there seem to be no lmsensors package of that
version for now. But now I get results:
w83627thf-isa-0290
Adapter: ISA adapter
VCore: +1.25 V (min = +0.70 V, max = +1.87 V)
+12V: +11.98 V (min = +6.51 V, max = +9.18 V) ALARM
+3.3V: +3.36 V (min = +0.26 V, max = +0.19 V) ALARM
+5V: +5.04 V (min = +2.72 V, max = +3.28 V) ALARM
-12V: -12.20 V (min = +3.27 V, max = -14.75 V) ALARM
V5SB: +5.05 V (min = +4.27 V, max = +1.61 V) ALARM
VBat: +3.22 V (min = +3.04 V, max = +3.92 V)
fan1: 0 RPM (min = 1035 RPM, div = 8) ALARM
CPU Fan: 0 RPM (min = 1171 RPM, div = 8) ALARM
fan3: 0 RPM (min = 3183 RPM, div = 8) ALARM
M/B Temp: -48°C (high = +29°C, hyst = +14°C) sensor =
thermistor
CPU Temp: +108.5°C (high = +120°C, hyst = +115°C) sensor = diode
temp3: -48.0°C (high = +120°C, hyst = +115°C) sensor =
thermistor
alarms: Chassis intrusion detection ALARM
beep_enable:
Sound alarm enabled
Thank you very much, Jean. My next problem are the strange values, but I
haven't read the manuals regarding that point yet.
Stefan
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] No sensors found >2.6.21, w83627hf, ICH6
2008-03-04 14:24 [lm-sensors] No sensors found >2.6.21, w83627hf, ICH6 Stefan Sassenberg
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-03-05 14:57 ` Stefan Sassenberg
@ 2008-03-05 15:04 ` Jean Delvare
2008-03-05 16:09 ` Stefan Sassenberg
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2008-03-05 15:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:57:14 +0100, Stefan Sassenberg wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:31:30 +0100, Stefan Sassenberg wrote:
> >> Jean Delvare wrote:
> >
> > I didn't notice at first but you wrote you were using lm-sensors 2.9.1.
> > That's pretty old. In kernel 2.6.22 the w83627hf driver was converted
> > from an i2c-isa driver to a platform driver (together with many other
> > hwmon driver, as we were finally getting rid of i2c-isa.) Support for
> > platform drivers was added to lm-sensors only in 2.10.0. So, no
> > surprise it doesn't work for you. For a kernel >= 2.6.22, I would even
> > recommend lm-sensors >= 2.10.3.
> >
> Very good. I could download deb packages of version 2.10.1. The next
> version is 2.10.5 but there seem to be no lmsensors package of that
> version for now. But now I get results:
>
> w83627thf-isa-0290
> Adapter: ISA adapter
> VCore: +1.25 V (min = +0.70 V, max = +1.87 V)
> +12V: +11.98 V (min = +6.51 V, max = +9.18 V) ALARM
> +3.3V: +3.36 V (min = +0.26 V, max = +0.19 V) ALARM
> +5V: +5.04 V (min = +2.72 V, max = +3.28 V) ALARM
> -12V: -12.20 V (min = +3.27 V, max = -14.75 V) ALARM
> V5SB: +5.05 V (min = +4.27 V, max = +1.61 V) ALARM
> VBat: +3.22 V (min = +3.04 V, max = +3.92 V)
> fan1: 0 RPM (min = 1035 RPM, div = 8) ALARM
> CPU Fan: 0 RPM (min = 1171 RPM, div = 8) ALARM
> fan3: 0 RPM (min = 3183 RPM, div = 8) ALARM
> M/B Temp: -48°C (high = +29°C, hyst = +14°C) sensor =
> thermistor
> CPU Temp: +108.5°C (high = +120°C, hyst = +115°C) sensor = diode
>
> temp3: -48.0°C (high = +120°C, hyst = +115°C) sensor =
> thermistor
> alarms: Chassis intrusion detection ALARM
> beep_enable:
> Sound alarm enabled
>
> Thank you very much, Jean. My next problem are the strange values, but I
> haven't read the manuals regarding that point yet.
The voltages look rather good to me, but you should compare with what
the BIOS says for confirmation. The limits are wrong but that's
expected - set them in /etc/sensors.conf and run "sensors -s" to write
them to the chip.
No fan speeds, strange, unless you have no fans on that systems, or
very very slow fans (in which case you should increase the fan_div
values to 16 or even 32.) Are there fan speeds displayed in the BIOS?
Temperatures look wrong, -48 typically means no sensor connected,
+108.5°C is too high to be realistic unless your computer case is on
fire ;) Try changing the thermal sensor types... although the BIOS
should have set them up right.
The lack of fan speeds and proper temperature readings might hint at an
additional sensor chip on your board. If you can't get them out of the
W83627THF, try running an up-to-date version of sensors-detect and see
if it finds an extra chip on the SMBus.
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] No sensors found >2.6.21, w83627hf, ICH6
2008-03-04 14:24 [lm-sensors] No sensors found >2.6.21, w83627hf, ICH6 Stefan Sassenberg
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2008-03-05 15:04 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2008-03-05 16:09 ` Stefan Sassenberg
2008-03-05 16:26 ` Jean Delvare
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Sassenberg @ 2008-03-05 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:57:14 +0100, Stefan Sassenberg wrote:
>> Jean Delvare wrote:
>>> On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 11:31:30 +0100, Stefan Sassenberg wrote:
>>>> Jean Delvare wrote:
>>> I didn't notice at first but you wrote you were using lm-sensors 2.9.1.
>>> That's pretty old. In kernel 2.6.22 the w83627hf driver was converted
>>> from an i2c-isa driver to a platform driver (together with many other
>>> hwmon driver, as we were finally getting rid of i2c-isa.) Support for
>>> platform drivers was added to lm-sensors only in 2.10.0. So, no
>>> surprise it doesn't work for you. For a kernel >= 2.6.22, I would even
>>> recommend lm-sensors >= 2.10.3.
>>>
>> Very good. I could download deb packages of version 2.10.1. The next
>> version is 2.10.5 but there seem to be no lmsensors package of that
>> version for now. But now I get results:
>>
>> w83627thf-isa-0290
>> Adapter: ISA adapter
>> VCore: +1.25 V (min = +0.70 V, max = +1.87 V)
>> +12V: +11.98 V (min = +6.51 V, max = +9.18 V) ALARM
>> +3.3V: +3.36 V (min = +0.26 V, max = +0.19 V) ALARM
>> +5V: +5.04 V (min = +2.72 V, max = +3.28 V) ALARM
>> -12V: -12.20 V (min = +3.27 V, max = -14.75 V) ALARM
>> V5SB: +5.05 V (min = +4.27 V, max = +1.61 V) ALARM
>> VBat: +3.22 V (min = +3.04 V, max = +3.92 V)
>> fan1: 0 RPM (min = 1035 RPM, div = 8) ALARM
>> CPU Fan: 0 RPM (min = 1171 RPM, div = 8) ALARM
>> fan3: 0 RPM (min = 3183 RPM, div = 8) ALARM
>> M/B Temp: -48°C (high = +29°C, hyst = +14°C) sensor =
>> thermistor
>> CPU Temp: +108.5°C (high = +120°C, hyst = +115°C) sensor = diode
>>
>> temp3: -48.0°C (high = +120°C, hyst = +115°C) sensor =
>> thermistor
>> alarms: Chassis intrusion detection ALARM
>> beep_enable:
>> Sound alarm enabled
>>
>> Thank you very much, Jean. My next problem are the strange values, but I
>> haven't read the manuals regarding that point yet.
>
> The voltages look rather good to me, but you should compare with what
> the BIOS says for confirmation. The limits are wrong but that's
> expected - set them in /etc/sensors.conf and run "sensors -s" to write
> them to the chip.
Yes, no problem.
>
> No fan speeds, strange, unless you have no fans on that systems, or
> very very slow fans (in which case you should increase the fan_div
> values to 16 or even 32.) Are there fan speeds displayed in the BIOS?
Fans have speed 1365rpm and 2396rpm resp. according to BIOS. Higher divs
aren't working either, but that's ok, fan speeds are no must at present.
>
> Temperatures look wrong, -48 typically means no sensor connected,
> +108.5°C is too high to be realistic unless your computer case is on
> fire ;) Try changing the thermal sensor types... although the BIOS
> should have set them up right.
>
> The lack of fan speeds and proper temperature readings might hint at an
> additional sensor chip on your board. If you can't get them out of the
> W83627THF, try running an up-to-date version of sensors-detect and see
> if it finds an extra chip on the SMBus.
Bad news for me:
Probing for `Analog Devices ADT7467 or ADT7468'... Success!
(confidence 7, driver `to-be-written')
Stefan
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] No sensors found >2.6.21, w83627hf, ICH6
2008-03-04 14:24 [lm-sensors] No sensors found >2.6.21, w83627hf, ICH6 Stefan Sassenberg
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2008-03-05 16:09 ` Stefan Sassenberg
@ 2008-03-05 16:26 ` Jean Delvare
2008-03-05 17:25 ` Stefan Sassenberg
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2008-03-05 16:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:09:02 +0100, Stefan Sassenberg wrote:
> Bad news for me:
>
> Probing for `Analog Devices ADT7467 or ADT7468'... Success!
> (confidence 7, driver `to-be-written')
No driver yet and nobody working on it as far as I know - but in the
meantime you may try forcing the lm85 driver, with chip type adm1027,
you should get some basic results.
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] No sensors found >2.6.21, w83627hf, ICH6
2008-03-04 14:24 [lm-sensors] No sensors found >2.6.21, w83627hf, ICH6 Stefan Sassenberg
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2008-03-05 16:26 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2008-03-05 17:25 ` Stefan Sassenberg
2008-03-06 8:31 ` Jean Delvare
2008-03-07 15:30 ` Stefan Sassenberg
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Sassenberg @ 2008-03-05 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:09:02 +0100, Stefan Sassenberg wrote:
>> Bad news for me:
>>
>> Probing for `Analog Devices ADT7467 or ADT7468'... Success!
>> (confidence 7, driver `to-be-written')
>
> No driver yet and nobody working on it as far as I know - but in the
> meantime you may try forcing the lm85 driver, with chip type adm1027,
> you should get some basic results.
>
After modprobing w83627hf, lm85, adm1021, adm1025, adm1026, adm1029,
adm1031 the results are just the same.
Meanwhile I connected the hard disk to a MSI W7231IMS. It has the same
AD chip:
Probing for `Analog Devices ADT7467 or ADT7468'... Success!
...but a different Winbond:
Found `Winbond W83627EHF/EHG Super IO Sensors' Success!
...and shows no fan speed but three temperature values:
Sys Temp: +33°C (high = +45°C, hyst = +40°C)
CPU Temp: +33.0°C (high = +45.0°C, hyst = +40.0°C)
temp3: +32.5°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C)
Not bad.
Stefan
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] No sensors found >2.6.21, w83627hf, ICH6
2008-03-04 14:24 [lm-sensors] No sensors found >2.6.21, w83627hf, ICH6 Stefan Sassenberg
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2008-03-05 17:25 ` Stefan Sassenberg
@ 2008-03-06 8:31 ` Jean Delvare
2008-03-07 15:30 ` Stefan Sassenberg
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2008-03-06 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 18:25:50 +0100, Stefan Sassenberg wrote:
> Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 17:09:02 +0100, Stefan Sassenberg wrote:
> >> Bad news for me:
> >>
> >> Probing for `Analog Devices ADT7467 or ADT7468'... Success!
> >> (confidence 7, driver `to-be-written')
> >
> > No driver yet and nobody working on it as far as I know - but in the
> > meantime you may try forcing the lm85 driver, with chip type adm1027,
> > you should get some basic results.
> >
> After modprobing w83627hf, lm85, adm1021, adm1025, adm1026, adm1029,
> adm1031 the results are just the same.
Huu, that's not what I suggested. Leave the adm1021, adm1025, adm1026,
adm1029 and adm1031 drivers alone, they won't work for you. Instead,
try loading the lm85 driver that way:
modprobe lm85 force_adm1027=0,0x2e
The exact parameter depends on the I2C bus and address where
sensors-detect found the ADT7467/8 chip. The above is for bus i2c-0,
address 0x2e. Adjust the command if the bus number or the chip address
differ on your system.
As you are using lm-sensors 2.10.1 with a recent kernel, it is possible
that libsensors won't work properly with the forced ADM1027 chip, but
at least you should be able to read some temperature values directly
from /sys/class/hwmon.
> Meanwhile I connected the hard disk to a MSI W7231IMS. It has the same
> AD chip:
> Probing for `Analog Devices ADT7467 or ADT7468'... Success!
> ...but a different Winbond:
> Found `Winbond W83627EHF/EHG Super IO Sensors' Success!
> ...and shows no fan speed but three temperature values:
> Sys Temp: +33°C (high = +45°C, hyst = +40°C)
> CPU Temp: +33.0°C (high = +45.0°C, hyst = +40.0°C)
> temp3: +32.5°C (high = +80.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C)
>
> Not bad.
Yep, these temperatures look reasonable.
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] No sensors found >2.6.21, w83627hf, ICH6
2008-03-04 14:24 [lm-sensors] No sensors found >2.6.21, w83627hf, ICH6 Stefan Sassenberg
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2008-03-06 8:31 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2008-03-07 15:30 ` Stefan Sassenberg
9 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Sassenberg @ 2008-03-07 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 15:34:47 +0100, Stefan Sassenberg wrote:
>> Jean Delvare wrote:
>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>
>>> On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 11:57:11 +0100, Stefan Sassenberg wrote:
>>>> Jean Delvare wrote:
>>>>> Huu, that's not what I suggested. Leave the adm1021, adm1025, adm1026,
>>>>> adm1029 and adm1031 drivers alone, they won't work for you. Instead,
>>>>> try loading the lm85 driver that way:
>>>>>
>>>>> modprobe lm85 force_adm1027=0,0x2e
>>>>>
>>>>> As you are using lm-sensors 2.10.1 with a recent kernel, it is possible
>>>>> that libsensors won't work properly with the forced ADM1027 chip, but
>>>>> at least you should be able to read some temperature values directly
>>>>> from /sys/class/hwmon.
>>>> Excellent hint. Since I don't need the values human readable but
>>>> automated, I can now read the values from a file, eventually convert
>>>> them from Fahrenheit to Celsius, et voila. And it works for all my four
>>>> types of mainboard.
>>> The sysfs values are in 1/1000 of Celsius, so converting them "from
>>> Fahrenheit to Celsius" wouldn't make much sense.
>> Yes, except for the "lm85 force_adm1027=0,0x2e" (see above). Those are
>> either in mFahrenheit or they are just nonsense and make sense when
>> converted to Celsius. Could that be?
>
> They are mCelsius, really. If they don't make sense, it means that the
> trick of forcing the adm1027 didn't work as expected...
Well, in that case, I think I have to consider that mainboard type
unsupported. Of course, the offer persists. :-)
Stefan
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-03-07 15:30 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-03-04 14:24 [lm-sensors] No sensors found >2.6.21, w83627hf, ICH6 Stefan Sassenberg
2008-03-04 15:00 ` Jean Delvare
2008-03-05 10:31 ` Stefan Sassenberg
2008-03-05 14:28 ` Jean Delvare
2008-03-05 14:57 ` Stefan Sassenberg
2008-03-05 15:04 ` Jean Delvare
2008-03-05 16:09 ` Stefan Sassenberg
2008-03-05 16:26 ` Jean Delvare
2008-03-05 17:25 ` Stefan Sassenberg
2008-03-06 8:31 ` Jean Delvare
2008-03-07 15:30 ` Stefan Sassenberg
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.