From: David Newall <davidn@davidnewall.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>, Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
"J.C. Pizarro" <jcpiza@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:32:17 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47D909B9.40701@davidnewall.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080313073828.GA8781@infradead.org>
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 04:52:11PM +1030, David Newall wrote:
>
>>> FWIW, I thought it was a well deserved "Al" thump.
>>>
>> Hostility such as that gives this list a bad reputation and drives
>> people away. One can (and should) tell people that an idea is
>> completely wrong without being rude.
>>
>> Perhaps I'm just incredibly sensitive today.
>>
>
> Or just dumb. If you're read past post by Mr Bizzaro you'd realize that
> driving him away would be a good thing
This is the sort of comment that gives Linux kernel developers a bad
name. I don't plan to read his past posts, just like I don't plan to
read yours. I don't need to read every stupid thing you've ever said to
know that I don't want anyone driven away. Can't you just ignore him?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-13 11:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-12 20:09 linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance J.C. Pizarro
2008-03-12 21:12 ` Al Viro
2008-03-13 5:57 ` David Newall
2008-03-13 6:12 ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-13 6:22 ` David Newall
2008-03-13 7:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-03-13 11:02 ` David Newall [this message]
2008-03-13 9:10 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-13 11:04 ` David Newall
2008-03-13 12:10 ` Alan Cox
2008-03-13 12:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-13 13:55 ` J.C. Pizarro
2008-03-13 19:40 ` David Newall
2008-03-13 20:05 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-13 22:50 ` Al Viro
2008-03-14 12:11 ` Stephen Clark
2008-03-14 6:05 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-03-13 10:50 ` David Newall
2008-03-13 12:23 ` J.C. Pizarro
2008-03-12 21:22 ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-12 21:32 ` Al Viro
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-12 18:14 Xose Vazquez Perez
2008-03-17 18:36 ` Xose Vazquez Perez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47D909B9.40701@davidnewall.com \
--to=davidn@davidnewall.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jcpiza@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.