All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Clark <Stephen.Clark@seclark.us>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: David Newall <davidn@davidnewall.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 08:11:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47DA6B62.5080103@seclark.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080313225040.GO27894@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 06:10:01AM +1030, David Newall wrote:
>   
>> Pekka Enberg wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi Alan,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 2:10 PM, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>>  Politeness is a good thing this list needs more of.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> Do you honestly think we should be polite to people trolling on the
>>> LKML?
>>>       
>> I do.  It's obvious.  Rudeness detracts (and reflects poorly on one's
>> parents.)  Good manners cost nothing.  I might also point out that it
>> was bad manners, not any alleged trolling, which caused this sad
>> discussion.
>>     
>
> "Deliberate insult" would describe the original posting more accurately.
> Whether you prefer to look at it as a show of bad manners or as trolling
> is a matter of perspective; arguably it had been both.
>
>   
>> Don't be rude; rather say nothing.
>>     
>
> Request duly noted and denied.  For the record: condescending twits of that
> variety ("I can't be arsed to look at code I'm commenting on; here's my
> valuable insight that is obviously beyond the mental capacity of anybody
> here") can expect a harsh reply, whoever they are.  I'm yet to see l-k
> regulars treating newbies that way, BTW, despite the much decried lack of
> politeness.
>
> Since you are postulating social norms, here's one you seem to have overlooked:
> one who comments on code or design, be it review, suggestions of changes/
> improvements, etc., ought to read the thing he is commenting on.  Whoever
> it is and wherever the code in question might be.  And yes, it applies to
> kernel hackers commenting on newbies' patches to the same extent as to
> completely unknown folks commenting on the kernel, etc.
>
> Breaking that rule and being caught at that is one hell of a way to earn
> yourself a lousy reputation.  Combine that with arrogance and... well,
> there's a term for what you become: target practice.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>   
Someone once said:
"If you don't have anything good to say, don't day anything at all".

I have been reading LKML since the mid 90's and continually see people 
jump on
what are maybe dumb/stupid questions or trolls instead of simply 
ignoring them.

My $.02
Steve

-- 

"They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, 
deserve neither liberty nor safety."  (Ben Franklin)

"The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty 
decreases."  (Thomas Jefferson)




  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-14 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-12 20:09 linux+glibc memory allocator, poor performance J.C. Pizarro
2008-03-12 21:12 ` Al Viro
2008-03-13  5:57   ` David Newall
2008-03-13  6:12     ` Mike Galbraith
2008-03-13  6:22       ` David Newall
2008-03-13  7:38         ` Christoph Hellwig
2008-03-13 11:02           ` David Newall
2008-03-13  9:10         ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-13 11:04           ` David Newall
2008-03-13 12:10           ` Alan Cox
2008-03-13 12:48             ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-13 13:55               ` J.C. Pizarro
2008-03-13 19:40               ` David Newall
2008-03-13 20:05                 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-03-13 22:50                 ` Al Viro
2008-03-14 12:11                   ` Stephen Clark [this message]
2008-03-14  6:05               ` Willy Tarreau
2008-03-13 10:50     ` David Newall
2008-03-13 12:23   ` J.C. Pizarro
2008-03-12 21:22 ` Rik van Riel
2008-03-12 21:32   ` Al Viro
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-03-12 18:14 Xose Vazquez Perez
2008-03-17 18:36 ` Xose Vazquez Perez

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47DA6B62.5080103@seclark.us \
    --to=stephen.clark@seclark.us \
    --cc=davidn@davidnewall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.