All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurentp@cse-semaphore.com>,
	ben@simtec.co.uk, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: OF compatible MTD platform RAM driver ?
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:40:56 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47EA6E88.5050109@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b06db7bb4932d14f8af9547abdfc9d0d@kernel.crashing.org>

Segher Boessenkool wrote:

>> - Using another device node with a compatible value set to 
>> "linear-ram" (or
>> something similar). This would support both volatile and non-volatile
>> devices, and a property could be added to specify if the device is 
>> volatile
>> or not.

> "memory-mapped-memory" perhaps :-)

> Or, just "memory".  Although that one might play havoc with some

    I'd suggest "ram" and "rom" then. Luckily the device trees don't contain 
binding for the real RAM chips yet. :-)

> not-quite-correct main memory probing code.

    You mean the there's parsers that search the "compatible" prop for 
"memory" as well as "device_type" prop?

> Segher

WBR, Sergei

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: ben@simtec.co.uk, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: OF compatible MTD platform RAM driver ?
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:40:56 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47EA6E88.5050109@ru.mvista.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b06db7bb4932d14f8af9547abdfc9d0d@kernel.crashing.org>

Segher Boessenkool wrote:

>> - Using another device node with a compatible value set to 
>> "linear-ram" (or
>> something similar). This would support both volatile and non-volatile
>> devices, and a property could be added to specify if the device is 
>> volatile
>> or not.

> "memory-mapped-memory" perhaps :-)

> Or, just "memory".  Although that one might play havoc with some

    I'd suggest "ram" and "rom" then. Luckily the device trees don't contain 
binding for the real RAM chips yet. :-)

> not-quite-correct main memory probing code.

    You mean the there's parsers that search the "compatible" prop for 
"memory" as well as "device_type" prop?

> Segher

WBR, Sergei

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-26 15:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-10 15:06 OF compatible MTD platform RAM driver ? Laurent Pinchart
2008-03-10 17:00 ` Rune Torgersen
2008-03-10 17:00   ` Rune Torgersen
2008-03-11  0:45   ` David Gibson
2008-03-11  0:45     ` David Gibson
2008-03-11 10:39     ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-03-11 10:39       ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-03-11 22:40       ` David Gibson
2008-03-25 14:36         ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-03-25 15:29           ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-03-25 15:51             ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-03-25 16:23               ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-03-25 16:44                 ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-03-25 17:02                   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-03-25 17:23                     ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-03-25 17:37                       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-03-25 17:56                       ` Rune Torgersen
2008-03-25 17:56                         ` Rune Torgersen
2008-03-25 18:14                         ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-03-25 18:14                           ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-03-26 12:53                           ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-03-26 12:53                             ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-03-27  9:13                             ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-03-27  9:13                               ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-03-27 10:03                               ` David Gibson
2008-03-27 10:03                                 ` David Gibson
2008-03-27 12:23                                 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-03-27 12:23                                   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-03-28  0:07                                   ` David Gibson
2008-03-28  0:07                                     ` David Gibson
2008-03-28 12:31                                     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-03-28 12:31                                       ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-03-27 14:31                                 ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-03-27 14:31                                   ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-03-28  0:09                                   ` David Gibson
2008-03-30 18:15                                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-03-30 18:15                                   ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-03-30 21:16                                   ` Paul Mackerras
2008-03-30 22:39                                     ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-03-31  0:42                                       ` Paul Mackerras
2008-03-31  0:59                                         ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-03-31  1:24                                           ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-03-31  8:21                                       ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-03-31  8:21                                         ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-03-31 12:21                                         ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-03-26 15:06                           ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-03-26 15:06                             ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-03-26 15:40                             ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2008-03-26 15:40                               ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-03-27  9:24                               ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-03-27  9:24                                 ` Laurent Pinchart
2008-03-30 18:12                               ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-03-30 18:12                                 ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-03-26 15:09                   ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-03-26 15:09                     ` Segher Boessenkool
2008-03-11 15:00     ` Rune Torgersen
2008-03-11 15:00       ` Rune Torgersen
2008-03-11 22:41       ` David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47EA6E88.5050109@ru.mvista.com \
    --to=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=ben@simtec.co.uk \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=laurentp@cse-semaphore.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.