From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"William L. Irwin" <wli@holomorphy.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] init: move setup of nr_cpu_ids to as early as possible v2
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:22:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47EA9456.8060709@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080326170950.GB20016@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:
>
>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Move the setting of nr_cpu_ids from sched_init() to
>>>> setup_per_cpu_areas(), so that it's available as early as possible.
>>> hm, why not a separate call before setup_per_cpu_areas(), so that we can
>>> avoid spreading this from generic kernel into a bunch of architectures
>>> that happen to have their own version of setup_per_cpu_areas():
>>>
>>>> 7 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>> Ingo
>> I had this before but I then discovered that an arch would increase
>> (and possible decrease) it's number of possible cpus in
>> setup_per_cpu_areas(). So I figured that setting nr_cpu_ids (and the
>> cpumask_of_cpu map) should be a side effect of setup_per_cpu_areas().
>
> well, then why not do it shortly after setup_per_cpu_areas()? That still
> moves it earlier than sched_init() but doesnt export all this code and
> complexity toevery setup_per_cpu_areas() implementation. (which clearly
> didnt need this complexity before)
>
> Ingo
Ok, will do.
Thanks,
Mike
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"William L. Irwin" <wli@holomorphy.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] init: move setup of nr_cpu_ids to as early as possible v2
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:22:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47EA9456.8060709@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080326170950.GB20016@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:
>
>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>> * Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Move the setting of nr_cpu_ids from sched_init() to
>>>> setup_per_cpu_areas(), so that it's available as early as possible.
>>> hm, why not a separate call before setup_per_cpu_areas(), so that we can
>>> avoid spreading this from generic kernel into a bunch of architectures
>>> that happen to have their own version of setup_per_cpu_areas():
>>>
>>>> 7 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>> Ingo
>> I had this before but I then discovered that an arch would increase
>> (and possible decrease) it's number of possible cpus in
>> setup_per_cpu_areas(). So I figured that setting nr_cpu_ids (and the
>> cpumask_of_cpu map) should be a side effect of setup_per_cpu_areas().
>
> well, then why not do it shortly after setup_per_cpu_areas()? That still
> moves it earlier than sched_init() but doesnt export all this code and
> complexity toevery setup_per_cpu_areas() implementation. (which clearly
> didnt need this complexity before)
>
> Ingo
Ok, will do.
Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-26 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-25 22:06 [PATCH 00/10] NR_CPUS: third reduction of NR_CPUS memory usage x86-version v2 Mike Travis
2008-03-25 22:06 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-25 22:06 ` [PATCH 01/10] x86_64: Cleanup non-smp usage of cpu maps v2 Mike Travis
2008-03-25 22:06 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-26 6:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-26 6:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-26 16:11 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-26 16:11 ` Mike Travis
2008-04-07 20:36 ` Mike Travis
2008-04-07 21:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-25 22:06 ` [PATCH 02/10] init: move setup of nr_cpu_ids to as early as possible v2 Mike Travis
2008-03-25 22:06 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-26 6:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-26 6:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-26 15:43 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-26 15:43 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-26 17:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-26 17:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-26 18:22 ` Mike Travis [this message]
2008-03-26 18:22 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-25 22:06 ` [PATCH 03/10] cpufreq: change cpu freq arrays to per_cpu variables Mike Travis
2008-03-25 22:06 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-25 22:06 ` [PATCH 04/10] acpi: change processors from array to per_cpu variable Mike Travis
2008-03-25 22:06 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-25 22:06 ` [PATCH 05/10] cpumask: Add cpumask_scnprintf_len function Mike Travis
2008-03-25 22:06 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-25 22:06 ` [PATCH 06/10] x86: reduce memory and stack usage in intel_cacheinfo Mike Travis
2008-03-25 22:06 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-26 6:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-26 6:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-26 15:41 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-26 15:41 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-26 16:13 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-03-26 16:13 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-03-26 16:27 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-26 16:27 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-26 16:59 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-03-26 16:59 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-03-26 18:15 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-26 18:15 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-26 17:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-26 17:12 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-26 17:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-26 17:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-03-26 17:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-26 17:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-26 18:20 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-26 18:20 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-25 22:06 ` [PATCH 07/10] cpu: change cpu_sys_devices from array to per_cpu variable Mike Travis
2008-03-25 22:06 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-25 22:06 ` [PATCH 08/10] net: remove NR_CPUS arrays in net/core/dev.c v2 Mike Travis
2008-03-25 22:06 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-25 22:06 ` [PATCH 09/10] x86: oprofile: remove NR_CPUS arrays in arch/x86/oprofile/nmi_int.c Mike Travis
2008-03-25 22:06 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-26 6:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-26 6:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-25 22:07 ` [PATCH 10/10] sched: Remove fixed NR_CPUS sized arrays in kernel_sched.c Mike Travis
2008-03-25 22:07 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-26 6:34 ` [PATCH 00/10] NR_CPUS: third reduction of NR_CPUS memory usage x86-version v2 Ingo Molnar
2008-03-26 6:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-03-26 15:48 ` Mike Travis
2008-03-26 15:48 ` Mike Travis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47EA9456.8060709@sgi.com \
--to=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.