From: Till Kamppeter <till.kamppeter@gmail.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@MIT.EDU>
Cc: printing-architecture@lists.linux-foundation.org,
lsb-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org, "Wichmann,
Mats D" <mats.d.wichmann@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Printing-architecture] [lsb-discuss] LSB 4.0 and printing
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 00:04:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47EC280B.9020102@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080326232809.GD7202@mit.edu>
Theodore Tso wrote:
>
> So it would be difficult even if the newer (trial-use) version of the
> component is a strict superset of the mandatory component?
>
> I can understand that if an interface has actually *changed* between
> the two versions, life would be hard; but if it's just a matter of
> marking some interface as trial-use, and others as required, would
> that still be hard?
About the CUPS interfaces I can say that nothing was removed between
CUPS 1.1.x and 1.2.x. There are only new interfaces and features added.
Till
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-27 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <47EA99E8.8020007@licquia.org>
2008-03-26 21:34 ` [Printing-architecture] [lsb-discuss] LSB 4.0 and printing Till Kamppeter
2008-03-27 8:48 ` Klaus Singvogel
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803271421320.19740@nelson.suse.de>
2008-03-27 14:19 ` Klaus Singvogel
2008-03-27 14:29 ` Till Kamppeter
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803271527300.20593@nelson.suse.de>
2008-03-27 15:31 ` Klaus Singvogel
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803271634280.23932@nelson.suse.de>
2008-03-27 16:55 ` Klaus Singvogel
2008-03-27 17:42 ` Ira McDonald
2008-03-27 22:57 ` Till Kamppeter
2008-03-28 14:02 ` Klaus Singvogel
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0803281008280.14927@nelson.suse.de>
2008-03-28 16:09 ` Klaus Singvogel
2008-03-27 22:23 ` Till Kamppeter
[not found] ` <20080326222308.GB7202@mit.edu>
[not found] ` <3F62CBEE02D6404E98C65934617EB582040A7A41@fmsmsx414.amr.corp.intel.com>
[not found] ` <20080326232809.GD7202@mit.edu>
2008-03-27 23:04 ` Till Kamppeter [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47EC280B.9020102@gmail.com \
--to=till.kamppeter@gmail.com \
--cc=lsb-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=mats.d.wichmann@intel.com \
--cc=printing-architecture@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tytso@MIT.EDU \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.