Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH 6/8] e1000e: convert ndev_ printks to something smaller

["Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>]

Kok, Auke wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> Auke Kok wrote:
>>> From: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
>>>
>>> The ndev_* printk's are too lenghty and we don't need to specify
>>> the adapter/netdev struct at all, making this a lot more readable.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>  drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h   |   27 ++++----
>>>  drivers/net/e1000e/ethtool.c |   38 +++++------
>>>  drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c  |  148 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>>>  drivers/net/e1000e/param.c   |   31 +++------
>>>  4 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
>> This stuff should just be removed.
>>
>> Either the code should be outputting "ethX: blahblah" via printk(), or 
>> the code should be outputting the standard dev_printk() prefix [driver 
>> name, PCI device info].
>>
>> Also, it is recommended to use the NETIF_MSG_xxx bits to permit 
>> fine-grained control over which messages are output, on a per-port basis 
>> (controlled via ethtool).  grep around for 'msg_enable'
> 
> yes and I even tried pushing for a generic netdev printk that incorporates the
> msg_enable bits properly
> 
> I also got absolutely unwelcome responses to that, if not none :)
> 
> once we get such a thing, we can incorporate this into e1000 with this patch by
> changing 2 lines. so I think this patch is still a good thing, and it certainly
> removes a lot of wrapped lines.

Jeff,

I'm not sure how to proceed with this mess cleanup so I'm removing that patch from
the series I sent, and I will revisit this issue later.

I'm resending the ones I have sent once but are on hold pending this discussion.
They are all meant for #upstream and should apply OK.

thanks,

Auke