From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelianov <xemul@openvz.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
Sudhir Kumar <skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, taka@valinux.co.jp,
linux-mm@kvack.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [-mm] Add an owner to the mm_struct (v8)
Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2008 12:01:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47F86E4F.2080103@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6599ad830804051631g15363456s1952fda0bb4d395d@mail.gmail.com>
Paul Menage wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 11:59 AM, Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> >> It's easier to set it up that way. Usually the end user gets the same SLA for
>> >> memory, CPU and other resources, so it makes sense to bind the controllers together.
>> >>
>> >
>> > True - but in that case why wouldn't they have the same SLA for
>> > virtual address space too?
>> >
>>
>> Yes, mostly. That's why I had made the virtual address space patches as a config
>> option on top of the memory controller :)
>>
>
> *If* they want to use the virtual address space controller, that is.
>
> By that argument, you should make the memory and cpu controllers the
> same controller, since in your scenario they'll usually be used
> together..
Heh, Virtual address and memory are more closely interlinked than CPU and Memory.
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-06 6:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-04 8:05 [-mm] Add an owner to the mm_struct (v8) Balbir Singh
2008-04-04 8:12 ` Paul Menage
2008-04-04 8:28 ` Balbir Singh
2008-04-04 8:50 ` Paul Menage
2008-04-04 9:25 ` Balbir Singh
2008-04-04 19:11 ` Paul Menage
2008-04-05 14:47 ` Balbir Singh
2008-04-05 17:23 ` Paul Menage
2008-04-05 17:48 ` Balbir Singh
2008-04-05 17:57 ` Paul Menage
2008-04-05 18:59 ` Balbir Singh
2008-04-05 23:29 ` Paul Menage
2008-04-06 5:38 ` Balbir Singh
2008-04-08 6:37 ` Paul Menage
2008-04-08 6:52 ` Balbir Singh
2008-04-08 6:57 ` Paul Menage
2008-04-08 7:05 ` Balbir Singh
2008-04-08 7:29 ` Paul Menage
2008-04-10 9:09 ` Balbir Singh
2008-04-10 9:09 ` Balbir Singh
2008-04-05 23:31 ` Paul Menage
2008-04-06 6:31 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2008-04-08 6:32 ` Paul Menage
2008-04-07 22:09 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-07 22:09 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-08 2:39 ` Balbir Singh
2008-04-08 2:55 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-09 0:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-09 0:42 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47F86E4F.2080103@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=skumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.