Re: [ANNOUNCE] e1000 to e1000e migration of PCI Express devices

["Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Kok, Auke <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> From kernel 2.6.26 onward all *PCI Express* device IDs previously 
>> supported by e1000 will be moving to the e1000e driver.  This includes 
>> ich8 and ich9 onboard LAN, server 5000 platform onboard LAN (es2) and 
>> 82571/2/3 chipset based adapters and variants.
>>
>> If you have not already enabled CONFIG_E1000E make sure that you do 
>> so. You can already do this with 2.6.25.  From 2.6.26 on this change 
>> will be required if you have such a device.
> 
> i'm not sure it's a good idea to unsupport hardware in a driver. It's OK 
> to phase out a driver and restrict it to legacy hardware, it's OK to 
> have an opt-in .config option for distros to select (or maybe even 
> opt-out) to narrow down the number of PCI IDs that a driver recognizes, 
> but lets not artificially break setups that worked before.
> 
> ( sidenote: isnt there some facility that selects the "better" driver in 
>   case there is an overlap between PCI IDs - with the ability for users 
>   to override that selection? )
> 
> such driver transitions are never smooth. For example there's an open 
> e1000e/e1000 regression in .25 in this area that i just noticed on a 
> testbox while doing randconfig testing. (that's why i noticed this 
> message of yours on lkml, i was searching for e1000 regression reports).
> 
> The following .config results in a non-working e1000 driver in a 
> bzImage:
> 
>  CONFIG_E1000=y
>  CONFIG_E1000_NAPI=y
>  CONFIG_E1000_DISABLE_PACKET_SPLIT=y
>  CONFIG_E1000E=m
>  CONFIG_E1000E_ENABLED=y
> 
> the interface just doesnt come up.
> 
> This makes it work:
> 
>  CONFIG_E1000=y
>  CONFIG_E1000_NAPI=y
>  CONFIG_E1000_DISABLE_PACKET_SPLIT=y
>  # CONFIG_E1000E is not set
>  # CONFIG_E1000E_ENABLED is not set
> 
> please fix such interactions and make the transition as smooth and as 
> compatible as possible.

This is really a vague report. Maybe you need to adjust your network setup to
explicitly load the correct driver at boot? The adapter works correct here and I
have a stock T60 here as well, just as you.

e1000e is a new module, so in your case maybe `CONFIG_E1000E=y` should just work?
Or just 'modprobe e1000e' ?

> the hardware is a stock T60 laptop with:
> 
> 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82573L Gigabit Ethernet Controller
> 
> ich7 onboard LAN. (can send more info if needed.)
> 
> I just tried the same .config on another box with onboard e1000 (a 
> desktop system with a different e1000 version), which is ich9, and that 
> broke too.

Just like Jeff is pointing out, we really cannot keep these device IDs around (not
just for my sanity) on the long term.

I really hate to have this discussion again (third time already) and I fear that
this will not be the last time :(

Auke

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference 
Register now and save $200. Hurry, offer ends at 11:59 p.m., 
Monday, April 7! Use priority code J8TLD2. 
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone