From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
jgarzik@pobox.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/13] devres: implement managed iomap interface
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:08:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47FEC823.9000100@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A567023C-17FC-402D-9394-29DFFA816891@kernel.crashing.org>
Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> but there is no reason not to make it work properly. For example I
>>> believe libata uses devm_* and the fsl SATA driver (non-PCI) will
>>> need to work in cases similar to the 44x.
>>
>> Well, as for sata_fsl, it calls of_iomap() which does The Right Thing.
>
> Fair, but I don't see why we should introduce new APIs that are already
> "broken". We went through a lot of effort to clean up and introduce
> resource_t (and clearly still have some bugs) for the >32-bit physical
> address problem.
Yes, please go ahead. In case it wasn't clear, I wasn't objecting to
the fix at all. I was just curious what could actually happen on x86.
--
tejun
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, gregkh@suse.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
jgarzik@pobox.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/13] devres: implement managed iomap interface
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:08:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47FEC823.9000100@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A567023C-17FC-402D-9394-29DFFA816891@kernel.crashing.org>
Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> but there is no reason not to make it work properly. For example I
>>> believe libata uses devm_* and the fsl SATA driver (non-PCI) will
>>> need to work in cases similar to the 44x.
>>
>> Well, as for sata_fsl, it calls of_iomap() which does The Right Thing.
>
> Fair, but I don't see why we should introduce new APIs that are already
> "broken". We went through a lot of effort to clean up and introduce
> resource_t (and clearly still have some bugs) for the >32-bit physical
> address problem.
Yes, please go ahead. In case it wasn't clear, I wasn't objecting to
the fix at all. I was just curious what could actually happen on x86.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-11 2:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-10 5:35 [PATCHSET] Managed device resources, take #2 Tejun Heo
2007-01-10 5:35 ` [PATCH 4/13] devres: implement managed DMA interface Tejun Heo
2007-01-10 5:35 ` Tejun Heo
2007-01-10 5:35 ` [PATCH 1/13] devres: device resource management core Tejun Heo
2007-01-10 5:35 ` Tejun Heo
2007-01-10 5:35 ` [PATCH 3/13] devres: implement managed IRQ interface Tejun Heo
2007-01-10 5:35 ` Tejun Heo
2007-01-10 5:35 ` [PATCH 2/13] devres: implement managed IO region interface Tejun Heo
2007-01-10 5:35 ` Tejun Heo
2007-01-10 5:35 ` [PATCH 6/13] devres: implement managed iomap interface Tejun Heo
2007-01-10 5:35 ` Tejun Heo
2008-04-07 16:46 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-04-07 16:46 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-04-08 14:48 ` Tejun Heo
2008-04-08 14:48 ` Tejun Heo
2008-04-08 14:55 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-04-08 14:55 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-04-08 15:03 ` Tejun Heo
2008-04-08 15:03 ` Tejun Heo
2008-04-10 16:56 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-04-10 16:56 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-04-10 17:44 ` Kumar Gala
2008-04-10 18:24 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2008-04-10 19:40 ` Kumar Gala
2008-04-11 2:08 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2008-04-11 2:08 ` Tejun Heo
2007-01-10 5:35 ` [PATCH 9/13] libata: update libata core layer to use devres Tejun Heo
2007-01-10 5:35 ` Tejun Heo
2007-01-10 5:35 ` [PATCH 8/13] libata: implement ata_host_detach() Tejun Heo
2007-01-10 5:35 ` Tejun Heo
2007-01-10 5:35 ` [PATCH 5/13] devres: implement managed PCI interface Tejun Heo
2007-01-10 5:35 ` Tejun Heo
2007-01-10 5:35 ` [PATCH 7/13] devres: add Documentation/driver-model/devres.txt Tejun Heo
2007-01-10 5:35 ` Tejun Heo
2007-01-10 5:35 ` [PATCH 12/13] devres: implement pcim_iomap_regions() Tejun Heo
2007-01-10 5:35 ` Tejun Heo
2007-01-10 5:35 ` [PATCH 11/13] libata: remove unused functions Tejun Heo
2007-01-10 5:35 ` Tejun Heo
2007-01-20 0:31 ` [PATCHSET] Managed device resources, take #2 Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47FEC823.9000100@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.