From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: l00484210 <limingwang@huawei.com>
Cc: fanhenglong@huawei.com, zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
victor.zhangxiaofeng@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
broonie@kernel.org, jiangyifei@huawei.com,
tangnianyao@huawei.com, wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com,
will@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
dengkai1@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: marking pages as XN in Stage-2 does not care about CTR_EL0.DIC
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 08:25:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47f80f46b9bac66846871b2db32a3f92@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201012010852.15932-1-limingwang@huawei.com>
Hi Li,
On 2020-10-12 02:08, l00484210 wrote:
> From: MingWang Li <limingwang@huawei.com>
>
> When testing the ARMv8.2-TTS2UXN feature, setting bits of XN is
> unavailable.
> Because the control bit CTR_EL0.DIC is set by default on system.
>
> But when CTR_EL0.DIC is set, software does not need to flush icache
> actively,
> instead of clearing XN bits.The patch, the commit id of which
> is 6ae4b6e0578886eb36cedbf99f04031d93f9e315, has implemented the
> function
> of CTR_EL0.DIC.
>
> Signed-off-by: MingWang Li <limingwang@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Henglong Fan <fanhenglong@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h | 12 +-----------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
> index 4d867c6446c4..5feb94882bf7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
> @@ -79,17 +79,7 @@ extern bool arm64_use_ng_mappings;
> __val; \
> })
>
> -#define PAGE_S2_XN \
> - ({ \
> - u64 __val; \
> - if (cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_CACHE_DIC)) \
> - __val = 0; \
> - else \
> - __val = PTE_S2_XN; \
> - __val; \
> - })
> -
> -#define PAGE_S2 __pgprot(_PROT_DEFAULT | PAGE_S2_MEMATTR(NORMAL) |
> PTE_S2_RDONLY | PAGE_S2_XN)
> +#define PAGE_S2 __pgprot(_PROT_DEFAULT | PAGE_S2_MEMATTR(NORMAL) |
> PTE_S2_RDONLY | PTE_S2_XN)
> #define PAGE_S2_DEVICE __pgprot(_PROT_DEFAULT |
> PAGE_S2_MEMATTR(DEVICE_nGnRE) | PTE_S2_RDONLY | PTE_S2_XN)
>
> #define PAGE_NONE __pgprot(((_PAGE_DEFAULT) & ~PTE_VALID) |
> PTE_PROT_NONE | PTE_RDONLY | PTE_NG | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN)
I don't understand what you are trying to achieve here.
This whole point of not setting XN in the page tables when DIC is
present
is to avoid a pointless permission fault at run time. At you noticed
above, no icache invalidation is necessary. So why would you ever want
to take a fault on exec the first place?
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: l00484210 <limingwang@huawei.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fanhenglong@huawei.com,
wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com, tangnianyao@huawei.com,
jiangyifei@huawei.com, dengkai1@huawei.com,
zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com, victor.zhangxiaofeng@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: KVM: marking pages as XN in Stage-2 does not care about CTR_EL0.DIC
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 08:25:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47f80f46b9bac66846871b2db32a3f92@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201012010852.15932-1-limingwang@huawei.com>
Hi Li,
On 2020-10-12 02:08, l00484210 wrote:
> From: MingWang Li <limingwang@huawei.com>
>
> When testing the ARMv8.2-TTS2UXN feature, setting bits of XN is
> unavailable.
> Because the control bit CTR_EL0.DIC is set by default on system.
>
> But when CTR_EL0.DIC is set, software does not need to flush icache
> actively,
> instead of clearing XN bits.The patch, the commit id of which
> is 6ae4b6e0578886eb36cedbf99f04031d93f9e315, has implemented the
> function
> of CTR_EL0.DIC.
>
> Signed-off-by: MingWang Li <limingwang@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Henglong Fan <fanhenglong@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h | 12 +-----------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
> b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
> index 4d867c6446c4..5feb94882bf7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable-prot.h
> @@ -79,17 +79,7 @@ extern bool arm64_use_ng_mappings;
> __val; \
> })
>
> -#define PAGE_S2_XN \
> - ({ \
> - u64 __val; \
> - if (cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_CACHE_DIC)) \
> - __val = 0; \
> - else \
> - __val = PTE_S2_XN; \
> - __val; \
> - })
> -
> -#define PAGE_S2 __pgprot(_PROT_DEFAULT | PAGE_S2_MEMATTR(NORMAL) |
> PTE_S2_RDONLY | PAGE_S2_XN)
> +#define PAGE_S2 __pgprot(_PROT_DEFAULT | PAGE_S2_MEMATTR(NORMAL) |
> PTE_S2_RDONLY | PTE_S2_XN)
> #define PAGE_S2_DEVICE __pgprot(_PROT_DEFAULT |
> PAGE_S2_MEMATTR(DEVICE_nGnRE) | PTE_S2_RDONLY | PTE_S2_XN)
>
> #define PAGE_NONE __pgprot(((_PAGE_DEFAULT) & ~PTE_VALID) |
> PTE_PROT_NONE | PTE_RDONLY | PTE_NG | PTE_PXN | PTE_UXN)
I don't understand what you are trying to achieve here.
This whole point of not setting XN in the page tables when DIC is
present
is to avoid a pointless permission fault at run time. At you noticed
above, no icache invalidation is necessary. So why would you ever want
to take a fault on exec the first place?
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-12 7:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-12 1:08 [PATCH] arm64: KVM: marking pages as XN in Stage-2 does not care about CTR_EL0.DIC l00484210
2020-10-12 1:08 ` l00484210
2020-10-12 7:25 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-10-12 7:25 ` Marc Zyngier
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-10-13 12:56 limingwang (A)
2020-10-13 14:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2020-10-13 14:56 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47f80f46b9bac66846871b2db32a3f92@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dengkai1@huawei.com \
--cc=fanhenglong@huawei.com \
--cc=jiangyifei@huawei.com \
--cc=limingwang@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tangnianyao@huawei.com \
--cc=victor.zhangxiaofeng@huawei.com \
--cc=wanghaibin.wang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.