From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2][POWERPC] qe_lib and ucc_geth: switch to the cpm_muram implementation
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:32:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48075F73.9060200@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080417141043.GA21793@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net>
Scott Wood wrote:
> And then change it again when marketing decides that CPM4 will be called
> something other than QE2? :-P
I agree with Scott. The QE is really just CPM3.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Timur Tabi <timur@freescale.com>
To: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Li Yang <LeoLi@freescale.com>,
avorontsov@ru.mvista.com, Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2][POWERPC] qe_lib and ucc_geth: switch to the cpm_muram implementation
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 09:32:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48075F73.9060200@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080417141043.GA21793@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net>
Scott Wood wrote:
> And then change it again when marketing decides that CPM4 will be called
> something other than QE2? :-P
I agree with Scott. The QE is really just CPM3.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-17 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-20 17:39 [RFC/PATCH] [POWERPC] qe_lib and ucc_geth: switch to the cpm_muram implementation Anton Vorontsov
2008-04-14 18:18 ` [PATCH rebased][POWERPC] " Anton Vorontsov
2008-04-16 18:22 ` [PATCH v2][POWERPC] " Anton Vorontsov
2008-04-16 18:22 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-04-17 3:38 ` Li Yang
2008-04-17 3:38 ` Li Yang
2008-04-17 13:26 ` Kumar Gala
2008-04-17 13:26 ` Kumar Gala
2008-04-17 14:10 ` Scott Wood
2008-04-17 14:10 ` Scott Wood
2008-04-17 14:32 ` Timur Tabi [this message]
2008-04-17 14:32 ` Timur Tabi
2008-04-18 3:29 ` Li Yang
2008-04-18 3:29 ` Li Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48075F73.9060200@freescale.com \
--to=timur@freescale.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.