* Celeron 220
@ 2008-04-23 21:20 Ing. Michal Zahor
2008-04-24 9:53 ` Thomas Renninger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ing. Michal Zahor @ 2008-04-23 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
Hi,
Celeron 220 in MoBo D201GLY2 said:
p4-clockmod: Unknown p4-clockmod-capable CPU. Please send an e-mail to
<cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk>
Is it possible to use any clockmod ?
Best regards,
Michal Zahor
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Celeron 220
2008-04-23 21:20 Celeron 220 Ing. Michal Zahor
@ 2008-04-24 9:53 ` Thomas Renninger
2008-04-24 17:11 ` Jarod Wilson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Renninger @ 2008-04-24 9:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ing. Michal Zahor; +Cc: cpufreq
On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 23:20 +0200, Ing. Michal Zahor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Celeron 220 in MoBo D201GLY2 said:
> p4-clockmod: Unknown p4-clockmod-capable CPU. Please send an e-mail to
> <cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk>
>
> Is it possible to use any clockmod ?
Can the p4-clockmod driver be finally removed?
AFAIK it's doing exactly the same as throttling.
I can remember it interfered with throttling
through /proc/acpi/processor/*/throttling and made the machine very slow
if both got used.
The throttling interface got enhanced recently and is the one to go for.
There were hundreds of confusing p4-clockmod reports now on the cpufreq
list... and since a distribution (guessing) is trying to load it by
default the amount of these reports seem to increase recently.
Thomas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Celeron 220
2008-04-24 9:53 ` Thomas Renninger
@ 2008-04-24 17:11 ` Jarod Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jarod Wilson @ 2008-04-24 17:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: cpufreq
Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-23 at 23:20 +0200, Ing. Michal Zahor wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Celeron 220 in MoBo D201GLY2 said:
>> p4-clockmod: Unknown p4-clockmod-capable CPU. Please send an e-mail to
>> <cpufreq@lists.linux.org.uk>
>>
>> Is it possible to use any clockmod ?
>
> Can the p4-clockmod driver be finally removed?
+1
> AFAIK it's doing exactly the same as throttling.
> I can remember it interfered with throttling
> through /proc/acpi/processor/*/throttling and made the machine very slow
> if both got used.
>
> The throttling interface got enhanced recently and is the one to go for.
>
> There were hundreds of confusing p4-clockmod reports now on the cpufreq
> list... and since a distribution (guessing) is trying to load it by
> default the amount of these reports seem to increase recently.
DaveJ shut it off in the Fedora kernels a while ago now, and only a few people
have even noticed, and most understood that it was for the best...
--
Jarod Wilson
jwilson@redhat.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-04-24 17:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-04-23 21:20 Celeron 220 Ing. Michal Zahor
2008-04-24 9:53 ` Thomas Renninger
2008-04-24 17:11 ` Jarod Wilson
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.