All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Ross Biro <rossb@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Page Faults slower in 2.6.25-rc9 than 2.6.23
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:12:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48175005.90400@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804291629410.23101@blonde.site>

Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Ross Biro wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Balbir Singh
>> <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>  Hmm.. strange.. I don't remember the overhead being so bad (I'll
>>>  relook at my old numbers). I'll try and git-bisect this one
>> I'm checking 2.6.24 now.  A quick run of 2.6.25-rc9 without fake numa
>> showed no real change.
> 
> Worth checking 2.6.24, yes.  But you've already made it clear that
> you do NOT have mem cgroups in your 2.6.25-rc9, so Balbir (probably)
> need not worry about your regression: my guess was wrong on that.
> 

Aah.. Yes... but I am definitely interested in figuring out the root cause for
the regression.

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: Ross Biro <rossb@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Page Faults slower in 2.6.25-rc9 than 2.6.23
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:12:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48175005.90400@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804291629410.23101@blonde.site>

Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Ross Biro wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Balbir Singh
>> <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>  Hmm.. strange.. I don't remember the overhead being so bad (I'll
>>>  relook at my old numbers). I'll try and git-bisect this one
>> I'm checking 2.6.24 now.  A quick run of 2.6.25-rc9 without fake numa
>> showed no real change.
> 
> Worth checking 2.6.24, yes.  But you've already made it clear that
> you do NOT have mem cgroups in your 2.6.25-rc9, so Balbir (probably)
> need not worry about your regression: my guess was wrong on that.
> 

Aah.. Yes... but I am definitely interested in figuring out the root cause for
the regression.

-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-04-29 16:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-29 13:10 Page Faults slower in 2.6.25-rc9 than 2.6.23 Ross Biro
2008-04-29 13:10 ` Ross Biro
2008-04-29 13:57 ` Hugh Dickins
2008-04-29 13:57   ` Hugh Dickins
2008-04-29 14:08   ` Ross Biro
2008-04-29 14:08     ` Ross Biro
2008-04-29 14:52   ` Balbir Singh
2008-04-29 14:52     ` Balbir Singh
2008-04-29 15:21     ` Ross Biro
2008-04-29 15:21       ` Ross Biro
2008-04-29 15:32       ` Hugh Dickins
2008-04-29 15:32         ` Hugh Dickins
2008-04-29 16:05         ` Ross Biro
2008-04-29 16:05           ` Ross Biro
2008-04-29 16:42         ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2008-04-29 16:42           ` Balbir Singh
2008-04-29 17:00           ` Ross Biro
2008-04-29 17:00             ` Ross Biro
2008-04-30 13:16             ` Ross Biro
2008-04-30 13:16               ` Ross Biro
2008-04-30  4:50 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-30  4:50   ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-04-30 11:33   ` Hugh Dickins
2008-04-30 11:33     ` Hugh Dickins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48175005.90400@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rossb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.