From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"xemul@openvz.org" <xemul@openvz.org>,
"yamamoto@valinux.co.jp" <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
"hugh@veritas.com" <hugh@veritas.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/6] memcg: remove refcnt
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 09:42:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <482B950C.2060408@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080514170703.db2d9802.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> /*
> - * Uncharging is always a welcome operation, we never complain, simply
> - * uncharge.
> + * uncharge if !page_mapped(page)
> */
> -void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct page *page)
> +void __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common(struct page *page, enum charge_type ctype)
static void ?
> {
> struct page_cgroup *pc;
> struct mem_cgroup *mem;
> @@ -704,29 +693,41 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct pag
> goto unlock;
>
[..snip..]
> Index: linux-2.6.26-rc2/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.26-rc2.orig/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ linux-2.6.26-rc2/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ extern int mem_cgroup_charge(struct page
> extern int mem_cgroup_cache_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
> gfp_t gfp_mask);
> extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct page *page);
> +extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(struct page *page);
> +extern int mem_cgroup_shrink_usage(struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp_mask);
This function is defined and used in the 4th patch, so the declaration
should be moved to that patch.
> extern void mem_cgroup_move_lists(struct page *page, bool active);
> extern unsigned long mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> struct list_head *dst,
> @@ -53,7 +55,6 @@ extern struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_fro
> extern int
> mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page, struct page *newpage);
> extern void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct page *page);
> -extern int mem_cgroup_getref(struct page *page);
>
> /*
> * For memory reclaim.
> @@ -97,6 +98,14 @@ static inline int mem_cgroup_cache_charg
> static inline void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct page *page)
> {
> }
need a blank line here
> +static inline void mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(struct page *page)
> +{
> +}
> +
[..snip..]
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> Index: linux-2.6.26-rc2/mm/shmem.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.26-rc2.orig/mm/shmem.c
> +++ linux-2.6.26-rc2/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -961,13 +961,14 @@ found:
> shmem_swp_unmap(ptr);
> spin_unlock(&info->lock);
> radix_tree_preload_end();
> -uncharge:
> - mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(page);
> out:
> unlock_page(page);
> page_cache_release(page);
> iput(inode); /* allows for NULL */
> return error;
> +uncharge:
> + mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(page);
> + goto out;
> }
>
Seems the logic is changed here. is it intended ?
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"xemul@openvz.org" <xemul@openvz.org>,
"yamamoto@valinux.co.jp" <yamamoto@valinux.co.jp>,
"hugh@veritas.com" <hugh@veritas.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/6] memcg: remove refcnt
Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 09:42:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <482B950C.2060408@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080514170703.db2d9802.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> /*
> - * Uncharging is always a welcome operation, we never complain, simply
> - * uncharge.
> + * uncharge if !page_mapped(page)
> */
> -void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct page *page)
> +void __mem_cgroup_uncharge_common(struct page *page, enum charge_type ctype)
static void ?
> {
> struct page_cgroup *pc;
> struct mem_cgroup *mem;
> @@ -704,29 +693,41 @@ void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct pag
> goto unlock;
>
[..snip..]
> Index: linux-2.6.26-rc2/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.26-rc2.orig/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ linux-2.6.26-rc2/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ extern int mem_cgroup_charge(struct page
> extern int mem_cgroup_cache_charge(struct page *page, struct mm_struct *mm,
> gfp_t gfp_mask);
> extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct page *page);
> +extern void mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(struct page *page);
> +extern int mem_cgroup_shrink_usage(struct mm_struct *mm, gfp_t gfp_mask);
This function is defined and used in the 4th patch, so the declaration
should be moved to that patch.
> extern void mem_cgroup_move_lists(struct page *page, bool active);
> extern unsigned long mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
> struct list_head *dst,
> @@ -53,7 +55,6 @@ extern struct mem_cgroup *mem_cgroup_fro
> extern int
> mem_cgroup_prepare_migration(struct page *page, struct page *newpage);
> extern void mem_cgroup_end_migration(struct page *page);
> -extern int mem_cgroup_getref(struct page *page);
>
> /*
> * For memory reclaim.
> @@ -97,6 +98,14 @@ static inline int mem_cgroup_cache_charg
> static inline void mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(struct page *page)
> {
> }
need a blank line here
> +static inline void mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(struct page *page)
> +{
> +}
> +
[..snip..]
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM
> Index: linux-2.6.26-rc2/mm/shmem.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.26-rc2.orig/mm/shmem.c
> +++ linux-2.6.26-rc2/mm/shmem.c
> @@ -961,13 +961,14 @@ found:
> shmem_swp_unmap(ptr);
> spin_unlock(&info->lock);
> radix_tree_preload_end();
> -uncharge:
> - mem_cgroup_uncharge_page(page);
> out:
> unlock_page(page);
> page_cache_release(page);
> iput(inode); /* allows for NULL */
> return error;
> +uncharge:
> + mem_cgroup_uncharge_cache_page(page);
> + goto out;
> }
>
Seems the logic is changed here. is it intended ?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-15 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-14 8:02 [RFC/PATCH 0/6] memcg: peformance improvement at el. v3 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:04 ` [RFC/PATCH 1/6] memcg: drop_pages at force_empty KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:04 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:07 ` [RFC/PATCH 2/6] memcg: remove refcnt KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:07 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-15 1:42 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2008-05-15 1:42 ` Li Zefan
2008-05-15 1:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-15 1:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-15 3:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-15 3:34 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:08 ` [RFC/PATCH 3/6] memcg: handle swapcache KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:08 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:10 ` [RFC/PATCH 4/6] memcg: shmem reclaim helper KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:15 ` Li Zefan
2008-05-14 8:15 ` Li Zefan
2008-05-14 8:25 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:25 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:23 ` Li Zefan
2008-05-14 8:23 ` Li Zefan
2008-05-14 8:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:11 ` [RFC/PATCH 5/6] memcg: optimize branch KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:11 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:13 ` [RFC/PATCH 6/6] memcg: remove redundant check at charge KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2008-05-14 8:13 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=482B950C.2060408@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
--cc=yamamoto@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.