* Re: [BUGFIX/PATCH 0/6] kvm-s390 fixes [not found] <1211369829.6194.10.camel@cotte.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> @ 2008-05-22 9:20 ` Avi Kivity 2008-05-23 10:51 ` Martin Schwidefsky 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2008-05-22 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Carsten Otte Cc: Christian Borntraeger, heicars2, Martin Schwidefsky, Olaf Schnapper, kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Carsten Otte wrote: > Hi Avi, > > this series contains a few Bug fixes of issues that we've identified. I > consider them all safe for 2.6.26, and in fact some of them fix serious > issues in the current upstream code. > > Applied and queued all. Martin, can you ack patch 2, which is in s390 code, not kvm code (although it is only triggered when kvm is invoked AFAICT). -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [BUGFIX/PATCH 0/6] kvm-s390 fixes 2008-05-22 9:20 ` [BUGFIX/PATCH 0/6] kvm-s390 fixes Avi Kivity @ 2008-05-23 10:51 ` Martin Schwidefsky 2008-05-25 13:47 ` Avi Kivity 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Martin Schwidefsky @ 2008-05-23 10:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Avi Kivity Cc: Carsten Otte, Christian Borntraeger, heicars2, Olaf Schnapper, kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 12:20 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > > this series contains a few Bug fixes of issues that we've identified. I > > consider them all safe for 2.6.26, and in fact some of them fix serious > > issues in the current upstream code. > > > > > > Applied and queued all. Martin, can you ack patch 2, which is in s390 > code, not kvm code (although it is only triggered when kvm is invoked > AFAICT). You could argue about the s390_enable_sie() function if it is architecture code or kvm code. Its sole purpose is to make it possible to execute sie. But I've sent the Acked-by. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [BUGFIX/PATCH 0/6] kvm-s390 fixes 2008-05-23 10:51 ` Martin Schwidefsky @ 2008-05-25 13:47 ` Avi Kivity 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Avi Kivity @ 2008-05-25 13:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: schwidefsky Cc: Carsten Otte, Christian Borntraeger, heicars2, Olaf Schnapper, kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > You could argue about the s390_enable_sie() function if it is > architecture code or kvm code. Its sole purpose is to make it possible > to execute sie. But I've sent the Acked-by. > Sure, anybody who knows s390 knows that. The ack is to reassure those few people who don't know s390 that well ;) -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-05-25 13:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1211369829.6194.10.camel@cotte.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
2008-05-22 9:20 ` [BUGFIX/PATCH 0/6] kvm-s390 fixes Avi Kivity
2008-05-23 10:51 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2008-05-25 13:47 ` Avi Kivity
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.