From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Tom Spink <tspink@gmail.com>,
Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel coding style for if ... else which cross #ifdef
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 13:43:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48387DF0.7000600@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48387CCB.1030801@goop.org>
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Tom Spink wrote:
>> A thought occurred to me that we may be able to used some preprocessor
>> magic and do this:
>>
>> #define config_defined(x) CFGVAL_## x
>>
>> Which means that, if we get Kconfig to produce:
>>
>> #define CFGVAL_CONFIG_FOO 0
>> #define CFGVAL_CONFIG_VALUE_BAR 1
>> #define CFGVAL_CONFIG_VALUE_BAZ_MODULE 1
>>
>> We can use this:
>>
>> if (config_defined(CONFIG_FOO) && some_expr) {
>> panic("Oh no.");
>> }
>
> Well, in that case you could use Willy's magic hack:
>
> #define config_defined(x) (x - 0)
>
> Which isn't a bad alternative to defining a whole pile of new symbols...
>
That can *strongly* be argued with.
In particular, the use of #ifdef is crap to begin with. Using #if even
for the preprocessor makes it possible to trap misspellings.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-24 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-23 19:11 kernel coding style for if ... else which cross #ifdef Steve French
2008-05-23 20:42 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-05-23 20:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-23 21:05 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-05-23 23:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-24 5:43 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-24 5:42 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-24 6:42 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-24 10:06 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 10:49 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-24 11:27 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-24 14:35 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 14:39 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-05-24 14:41 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 14:46 ` Willy Tarreau
2008-05-24 15:36 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-24 15:45 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 15:57 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-05-24 16:02 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 16:40 ` Tom Spink
2008-05-24 16:42 ` Tom Spink
2008-05-24 20:38 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 20:43 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2008-05-24 20:51 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-24 20:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-24 21:15 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-05-25 23:57 ` Adrian Bunk
2008-05-26 0:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-24 18:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-24 18:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-05-24 18:51 ` Sam Ravnborg
2008-05-24 18:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48387DF0.7000600@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=smfrench@gmail.com \
--cc=tspink@gmail.com \
--cc=vegard.nossum@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.