All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phylib: Don't allow core of phylib to build as a module
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:39:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48442239.7090906@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1E4EB64C-0618-497E-AABC-74EB7D74B97F@kernel.crashing.org>

Kumar Gala wrote:
> 
> On Jun 2, 2008, at 11:03 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
>> Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> The core portions of the phylib aren't capable of being used as
>>> a module.  This isn't really any different than something like i2c
>>> in that the bus driver and core need to be built into the kernel.
>>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
>>> ---
>>> Jeff, please consider this for 2.6.26 as w/o it we get build issues
>>> if phylib is config'd as a module on ppc.
>>> drivers/net/phy/Kconfig |    2 +-
>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
>>> index 6eb2d31..ab04cc7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
>>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>>> #
>>> menuconfig PHYLIB
>>> -    tristate "PHY Device support and infrastructure"
>>> +    bool "PHY Device support and infrastructure"
>>>     depends on !S390
>>>     depends on NET_ETHERNET
>>
>> What are the issues?
>>
>> The core _should_ be able to be built as a module.
> 
> The core provides functions like phy_read/phy_write.  Andy has recently 
> introduced board level workaround/fixups.  The problem is these 
> workarounds tend to use phy_read/phy_write and the board/platform code 
> is not built as modules.
> 
> So we get errors like:
> 
> arch/powerpc/platforms/built-in.o: In function `mpc8568_mds_phy_fixups':
> /home/galak/git/master/powerpc/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c:99: 
> undefined reference to `phy_write'
> /home/galak/git/master/powerpc/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c:104: 
> undefined reference to `phy_read'

The whole world isn't embedded ppc, we use this stuff elsewhere too.

You guys need to figure out something that doesn't require phylib be 
built-in on ALL platforms, but only the platforms that require it.

Or, update the platform to not require built-in -- convert the board 
code to function pointers, and execute them later on somehow, for example.

	Jeff

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] phylib: Don't allow core of phylib to build as a module
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:39:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48442239.7090906@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1E4EB64C-0618-497E-AABC-74EB7D74B97F@kernel.crashing.org>

Kumar Gala wrote:
> 
> On Jun 2, 2008, at 11:03 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
>> Kumar Gala wrote:
>>> The core portions of the phylib aren't capable of being used as
>>> a module.  This isn't really any different than something like i2c
>>> in that the bus driver and core need to be built into the kernel.
>>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
>>> ---
>>> Jeff, please consider this for 2.6.26 as w/o it we get build issues
>>> if phylib is config'd as a module on ppc.
>>> drivers/net/phy/Kconfig |    2 +-
>>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
>>> index 6eb2d31..ab04cc7 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/Kconfig
>>> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>>> #
>>> menuconfig PHYLIB
>>> -    tristate "PHY Device support and infrastructure"
>>> +    bool "PHY Device support and infrastructure"
>>>     depends on !S390
>>>     depends on NET_ETHERNET
>>
>> What are the issues?
>>
>> The core _should_ be able to be built as a module.
> 
> The core provides functions like phy_read/phy_write.  Andy has recently 
> introduced board level workaround/fixups.  The problem is these 
> workarounds tend to use phy_read/phy_write and the board/platform code 
> is not built as modules.
> 
> So we get errors like:
> 
> arch/powerpc/platforms/built-in.o: In function `mpc8568_mds_phy_fixups':
> /home/galak/git/master/powerpc/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c:99: 
> undefined reference to `phy_write'
> /home/galak/git/master/powerpc/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/mpc85xx_mds.c:104: 
> undefined reference to `phy_read'

The whole world isn't embedded ppc, we use this stuff elsewhere too.

You guys need to figure out something that doesn't require phylib be 
built-in on ALL platforms, but only the platforms that require it.

Or, update the platform to not require built-in -- convert the board 
code to function pointers, and execute them later on somehow, for example.

	Jeff




  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-06-02 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-02 15:58 [PATCH] phylib: Don't allow core of phylib to build as a module Kumar Gala
2008-06-02 15:58 ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-02 16:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-06-02 16:03   ` Jeff Garzik
2008-06-02 16:25   ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-02 16:25     ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-02 16:32     ` Scott Wood
2008-06-02 16:32       ` Scott Wood
2008-06-02 16:39     ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2008-06-02 16:39       ` Jeff Garzik
2008-06-02 19:19       ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-02 19:19         ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-02 20:29         ` Jeff Garzik
2008-06-02 20:29           ` Jeff Garzik
2008-06-02 23:06           ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-02 23:06             ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-02 19:30       ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-02 19:30         ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-02 19:44         ` Andy Fleming
2008-06-02 19:44           ` Andy Fleming
2008-06-02 20:30           ` Jeff Garzik
2008-06-02 20:30             ` Jeff Garzik
2008-06-02 23:07             ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-02 23:07               ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-02 23:20               ` Scott Wood
2008-06-02 23:20                 ` Scott Wood
2008-06-03 14:47                 ` [RFC] Make board force selection of PHYLIB Kumar Gala
2008-06-03 14:47                   ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-03 15:10                   ` Scott Wood
2008-06-03 15:10                     ` Scott Wood
2008-06-03 15:14                     ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-03 15:14                       ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-03 15:18                       ` Scott Wood
2008-06-03 15:18                         ` Scott Wood
2008-06-03 15:31                         ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-03 15:31                           ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-03 15:36                           ` Scott Wood
2008-06-03 15:36                             ` Scott Wood
2008-06-03 15:40                             ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-03 15:40                               ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-03 15:56                               ` Scott Wood
2008-06-03 15:56                                 ` Scott Wood
2008-06-03 18:07                           ` Andy Fleming
2008-06-03 18:07                             ` Andy Fleming
2008-06-03 17:00                   ` Adrian Bunk
2008-06-03 18:11                     ` Andy Fleming
2008-06-03 18:23                     ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-06 15:19                 ` [PATCH] phylib: Don't allow core of phylib to build as a module Grant Likely
2008-06-06 15:19                   ` Grant Likely
2008-06-02 16:54     ` Adrian Bunk
2008-06-02 16:54       ` Adrian Bunk
2008-06-02 19:24       ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-02 19:24         ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-06 15:40         ` [PATCH] [POWERPC] 85xx: MPC85xx MDS - Unconditionally select PHYLIB for board fixups Kumar Gala
2008-06-06 15:40           ` Kumar Gala
2008-06-06 17:48           ` Jeff Garzik
2008-06-06 17:48             ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48442239.7090906@garzik.org \
    --to=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=galak@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.