All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: andi@firstfloor.org, ioe-lkml@rameria.de, sivanich@sgi.com,
	a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel@kolivas.org, dfults@sgi.com, devik@cdi.cz,
	dino@in.ibm.com, emmanuel.pacaud@univ-poitiers.fr,
	deweerdt@free.fr, mingo@elte.hu, colpatch@us.ibm.com,
	nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, rostedt@goodmis.org, oleg@tv-sign.ru,
	paulmck@us.ibm.com, menage@google.com, rddunlap@osdl.org,
	suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may have realtime uses)
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 12:45:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4846F0DE.1070708@qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080604143743.b492c411.pj@sgi.com>



Paul Jackson wrote:
>> btw Are you guys using some kind of castrated, statically linked shell to run
>> that script ?
> 
> It (that init= program) is not a script.  It is its own
> castrated, statically linked special purpose binary.
> Once it has done its duty setting up cpusets, it then
> exec's the normal init, confined to the cpuset configured
> for it.

Got it.

Max

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-04 19:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-02  2:30 Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may have realtime uses) Paul Jackson
2008-06-02 16:42 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2008-06-02 18:39   ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-02 21:41     ` Dimitri Sivanich
2008-06-02 21:59       ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-03 14:40         ` Dimitri Sivanich
2008-06-03 17:57           ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-06-04 14:00           ` Dimitri Sivanich
2008-06-04 18:07             ` Stop machine threads are getting preemted by the rt period enforcement Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-04 18:18               ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-04 18:24                 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-04 18:55                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-04 20:14                     ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-02 22:35 ` Inquiry: Should we remove "isolcpus= kernel boot option? (may have realtime uses) Ingo Oeser
2008-06-02 22:45   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-02 23:04     ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-02 23:55       ` Ingo Oeser
2008-06-03  3:32         ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-03 23:47           ` Max Krasnyanskiy
2008-06-04  0:41             ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04  4:32               ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-04  4:47                 ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 12:18                 ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-04 17:41                   ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 18:29                     ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-04 18:56                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-04 19:34                         ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-04 18:58                       ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 19:31                         ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-04 19:37                           ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 19:45                             ` Max Krasnyansky [this message]
2008-06-04 20:05                       ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-04 20:23                         ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 20:03                     ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-04 20:16                       ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 20:33                         ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-04 20:38                           ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 21:16                             ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-04 21:17                               ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 21:20                                 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-04 21:26                                   ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04  1:18             ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-04  3:00               ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-04 16:18             ` Ingo Oeser
2008-06-04 17:47               ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-03  6:03     ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-04  9:58       ` Mark Hounschell
2008-06-04 17:26         ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 21:00           ` Mark Hounschell
2008-06-04 21:03             ` Paul Jackson
2008-06-04 19:26         ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-04 20:25           ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-04 21:44             ` Michael Trimarchi
2008-06-04 21:52               ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-05 11:16                 ` Michael Trimarchi
2008-06-05 12:07                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-05 14:57                     ` Michael Trimarchi
2009-05-08  2:48               ` GeunSik Lim
2008-06-05 11:44             ` Mark Hounschell
2008-06-06 22:28               ` Max Krasnyanskiy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4846F0DE.1070708@qualcomm.com \
    --to=maxk@qualcomm.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=devik@cdi.cz \
    --cc=deweerdt@free.fr \
    --cc=dfults@sgi.com \
    --cc=dino@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=emmanuel.pacaud@univ-poitiers.fr \
    --cc=ioe-lkml@rameria.de \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=menage@google.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=rddunlap@osdl.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sivanich@sgi.com \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.