MIPS machine.confs

MIPS machine.confs

[Henning Heinold]

Hi,

there are serval .conf under machine/ (rb500.conf,wrt54,wl500g.conf)
which using TARGET_CC_ARCH = "-Os". I suggest this should be not set
there, becaue it's a distribution-thingie. If no one minds I will clean it up.

Bye Henning

Re: MIPS machine.confs

[Koen Kooi]

Henning Heinold wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there are serval .conf under machine/ (rb500.conf,wrt54,wl500g.conf)
> which using TARGET_CC_ARCH = "-Os". I suggest this should be not set
> there, becaue it's a distribution-thingie. If no one minds I will clean it up.

I certainly don't mind, it a thing I missed in my previous machine/tune 
cleanup :)

regards,

Koen

Re: MIPS machine.confs

[Michael 'Mickey' Lauer]

On Friday 16 May 2008 23:47:10 Henning Heinold wrote:
> there are serval .conf under machine/ (rb500.conf,wrt54,wl500g.conf)
> which using TARGET_CC_ARCH = "-Os". I suggest this should be not set
> there, becaue it's a distribution-thingie. If no one minds I will clean it
> up.

Not at all, thanks a lot! We need to find more MIPS people.

Cheers,

:M:
-- 
Dr. Michael 'Mickey' Lauer | IT-Freelancer | http://www.vanille-media.de

Getting a tested patch into Angstrom stable

[Matthew Swabey]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I have developed a backport for 2.6.24-rp to fix the zaurus' pxa2xx-udc
clock bug.

If I want it to get into the current angstrom stable who do I bug
(chortle, pun :) )?

I am correct in thinking that Angstrom stable is part of OE aren't I?

Cheers, nice to be working with OE again after all this time! I haven't
used it since I owned a SL-5600 and bitbake didn't exist. Neither did
OE, just OZ.

Impressive, impressive work.

- --
Dr Matthew Swabey
Rm3229, Bldg59 New Zepler
School of ECS
University of Southampton
University Road
Southampton, SO17 1BJ
England

Tel: 02380 597381

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkgwq4UACgkQsoSsB2Ynk1AJfgCeIgR2W4RY7BlZfNku+IZGBeNn
ABsAoLXIRwUe28q3HFdF/McDkhRJl1RN
=xqoW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: Getting a tested patch into Angstrom stable

[Gordon]

On 05/18/2008 05:19 PM, Matthew Swabey wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> I have developed a backport for 2.6.24-rp to fix the zaurus' pxa2xx-udc
> clock bug.
> 
> If I want it to get into the current angstrom stable who do I bug
> (chortle, pun :) )?

This patch conflicts with two udc patches for tosa, as you aware in your 
bug report. We need to either conditionally apply this for machines 
other than tosa or find a way to solve the conflict.

Regards
Gordon