All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
To: Tomas Winkler <tomasw@gmail.com>
Cc: "Tor Håkon Haugen" <tor.hakon.haugen@gmail.com>,
	"Zhu Yi" <yi.zhu@intel.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [ipw3945-devel] [BUG] iwlwifi 3945 works only with disable_hw_scan=1
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 09:46:16 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48560C38.3030901@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48560359.4090909@gmail.com>

.....
> 
> I just want to note that hardware scanning doesn't work well here 
> (something unrelated)
> 
> First of all I noticed large delays in communications occurring 
> sometimes, I for example tried pinging Google, and every 20 replies
> I get about 10 lost packets. (this is exactly what hardware scanning 
> should prevent, but it seems that the opposite happens)
> 
> I tried that again now, and see no delays, but I reproduced this twice.

Rebooted, and here it is:

maxim@MOBILE:~$ ping www.google.com
PING www.google.com (209.85.135.147) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=1 ttl=245 time=89.0 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=2 ttl=245 time=89.2 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=3 ttl=245 time=87.2 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=4 ttl=245 time=87.0 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=5 ttl=245 time=85.7 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=6 ttl=245 time=88.2 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=7 ttl=245 time=88.2 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=8 ttl=245 time=86.7 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=9 ttl=245 time=85.8 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=10 ttl=245 time=89.0 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=11 ttl=245 time=88.5 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=12 ttl=245 time=89.5 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=13 ttl=245 time=87.0 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=14 ttl=245 time=87.1 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=15 ttl=245 time=89.1 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=16 ttl=245 time=89.0 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=17 ttl=245 time=87.0 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=25 ttl=245 time=87.8 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=26 ttl=245 time=89.2 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=27 ttl=245 time=87.2 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=28 ttl=245 time=89.0 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=29 ttl=245 time=85.9 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=30 ttl=245 time=86.9 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=31 ttl=245 time=87.8 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=32 ttl=245 time=87.3 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=33 ttl=245 time=86.8 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=34 ttl=245 time=87.2 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=35 ttl=245 time=89.1 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=36 ttl=245 time=88.2 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=37 ttl=245 time=87.6 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=38 ttl=245 time=87.1 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=39 ttl=245 time=88.6 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=40 ttl=245 time=87.6 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=41 ttl=245 time=86.6 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=42 ttl=245 time=87.7 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=43 ttl=245 time=87.7 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=44 ttl=245 time=87.8 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=45 ttl=245 time=86.3 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=46 ttl=245 time=86.4 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=47 ttl=245 time=88.4 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=55 ttl=245 time=87.7 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=56 ttl=245 time=88.4 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=57 ttl=245 time=87.5 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=58 ttl=245 time=87.0 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=59 ttl=245 time=87.6 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=60 ttl=245 time=87.1 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=61 ttl=245 time=88.1 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=62 ttl=245 time=89.7 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.135.147): icmp_seq=63 ttl=245 time=87.1 ms
^C
--- www.google.com ping statistics ---
63 packets transmitted, 49 received, 22% packet loss, time 62140ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 85.770/87.752/89.720/1.068 ms
maxim@MOBILE:~$

and here:

ping www.google.com
PING www.l.google.com (209.85.129.99) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=1 ttl=246 time=82.5 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=9 ttl=246 time=79.6 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=10 ttl=246 time=83.0 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=11 ttl=246 time=82.6 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=12 ttl=246 time=82.0 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=13 ttl=246 time=82.1 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=14 ttl=246 time=81.9 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=15 ttl=246 time=81.4 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=16 ttl=246 time=82.0 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=17 ttl=246 time=80.9 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=18 ttl=246 time=80.9 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=19 ttl=246 time=80.5 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=20 ttl=246 time=81.5 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=21 ttl=246 time=80.5 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=22 ttl=246 time=80.1 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=23 ttl=246 time=82.5 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=24 ttl=246 time=82.0 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=25 ttl=246 time=82.0 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=26 ttl=246 time=81.0 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=27 ttl=246 time=81.5 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=28 ttl=246 time=81.0 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=29 ttl=246 time=80.0 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=30 ttl=246 time=80.0 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=31 ttl=246 time=80.0 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=39 ttl=246 time=82.8 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=40 ttl=246 time=82.3 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=41 ttl=246 time=81.3 ms
64 bytes from www.google.com (209.85.129.99): icmp_seq=42 ttl=246 time=81.8 ms
^C
--- www.l.google.com ping statistics ---
42 packets transmitted, 28 received, 33% packet loss, time 41109ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 79.627/81.461/83.079/0.961 ms
maxim@MOBILE:~$


> 
> Then power levels go crazy, the nm-applet shows that my access point 
> have 23% quality, then 100%, then something low again, and looking list 
> of networks withing same applet, it shows for example now that all 3 
> networks (mine, and two neighbors) have 100% quality, which is just wrong.
> 
Don't see that now, but sudo iwlist wlan0 scan shows only my access point,
although there are two another strong access points.

Best regards,
	Maxim levitsky

> 
> Best regards,
>     Maxim Levitsky
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-16  6:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-11 15:07 [BUG] iwlwifi 3945 works only with disable_hw_scan=1 Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-12  3:28 ` Zhu Yi
2008-06-12 12:13   ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-12 13:59   ` [ipw3945-devel] " John W. Linville
2008-06-12 14:19     ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-12 20:25     ` Stephen Clark
2008-06-13  7:35     ` Zhu Yi
2008-06-13  8:48       ` Filippo Zangheri
2008-06-13 12:37         ` Tor Håkon Haugen
2008-06-13 13:03       ` John W. Linville
2008-06-13 14:59         ` Tor Håkon Haugen
2008-06-13 15:06           ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-13 15:09             ` Tor Håkon Haugen
2008-06-13 20:04             ` Tomas Winkler
2008-06-14 10:00               ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-14 16:50               ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-06-15 13:42               ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-15 13:47                 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-06-15 14:12                   ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-15 15:09                     ` Tomas Winkler
2008-06-15 16:47                       ` Tomas Winkler
2008-06-16  5:50                         ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-16  5:52                           ` Tomas Winkler
2008-06-16  6:08                             ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-16  6:46                               ` Maxim Levitsky [this message]
2008-06-16  7:11                                 ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-16 14:35                               ` Dan Williams
2008-06-16 21:41                                 ` Tomas Winkler
2008-06-18  8:28                             ` drago01
2008-06-24 19:47                               ` John W. Linville
2008-06-24 20:32                                 ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-25  5:43                                 ` Tomas Winkler
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-06-11 15:47 Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-12  2:26 ` [ipw3945-devel] " Zhu Yi
2008-06-12  6:42   ` drago01
2008-06-12  7:08     ` Zhu Yi
2008-06-12 12:48   ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-12 14:22     ` Maxim Levitsky
2008-06-12 14:26       ` Norbert Preining
2008-06-12 15:02     ` Dan Williams
2008-06-13  2:00       ` Zhu Yi
2008-06-13 14:45         ` Dan Williams
2008-06-16  1:40           ` Zhu Yi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48560C38.3030901@gmail.com \
    --to=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tomasw@gmail.com \
    --cc=tor.hakon.haugen@gmail.com \
    --cc=yi.zhu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.