From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
"Mark M. Hoffman" <mhoffman@lightlink.com>,
Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks lm-sensors 2 userspace
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 11:28:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4860BE4B.10100@keyaccess.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080624085940.3ee3bf77@hyperion.delvare>
On 24-06-08 08:59, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:07:15 -0700 (PDT), Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Robert Hancock wrote:
>>> Mark M. Hoffman wrote:
>>>> 2) This patch is broken.
>>> You didn't indicate what was wrong with the patch.
>> Yes. Leaving everybody wondering whether it's just an opinionated
>> expression of the former problem, or whether there is a real and
>> understandable reason why it was NACK'ed.
>
> I guess Mark assumed that everybody had read the discussion thread Rene
> referenced, where I explained why his patch was broken:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/23/175
You could've known that he himself didn't because in that same thread I
explained to you why it wasn't broken in actual real life.
That said, I agree that with the issue of multiple thermal zones sharing
a single hwmon interface (as also indicated in the changelog) it's not a
nice solution. Len Brown also indicated that the "make it optional"
patch (originally nacked as ugly by Hans, which was the only reason I
tried getting you people something else again...) that I saw Zhang Rui
repost just now would be better than that.
And, as said, now that lm-sensors 2.10.7 is close, I don't actually
think it's a huge deal anymore anyway. The breakage is still pretty
unfortunate, but that one should be painless enough as an upgrade to
shrug this off really. It was the upgrade path to 3.x which would've
been much too painful to have this done without any prior warning.
So we're waiting for 2.10.7 now.
Rene.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
"Mark M. Hoffman" <mhoffman@lightlink.com>,
Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:28:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4860BE4B.10100@keyaccess.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080624085940.3ee3bf77@hyperion.delvare>
On 24-06-08 08:59, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:07:15 -0700 (PDT), Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Robert Hancock wrote:
>>> Mark M. Hoffman wrote:
>>>> 2) This patch is broken.
>>> You didn't indicate what was wrong with the patch.
>> Yes. Leaving everybody wondering whether it's just an opinionated
>> expression of the former problem, or whether there is a real and
>> understandable reason why it was NACK'ed.
>
> I guess Mark assumed that everybody had read the discussion thread Rene
> referenced, where I explained why his patch was broken:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/23/175
You could've known that he himself didn't because in that same thread I
explained to you why it wasn't broken in actual real life.
That said, I agree that with the issue of multiple thermal zones sharing
a single hwmon interface (as also indicated in the changelog) it's not a
nice solution. Len Brown also indicated that the "make it optional"
patch (originally nacked as ugly by Hans, which was the only reason I
tried getting you people something else again...) that I saw Zhang Rui
repost just now would be better than that.
And, as said, now that lm-sensors 2.10.7 is close, I don't actually
think it's a huge deal anymore anyway. The breakage is still pretty
unfortunate, but that one should be painless enough as an upgrade to
shrug this off really. It was the upgrade path to 3.x which would've
been much too painful to have this done without any prior warning.
So we're waiting for 2.10.7 now.
Rene.
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-24 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <fa.4PGqX9CuLbgiTimfCcon+PlAMxk@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.PWu620xEt5OlYdOezvRtQriuNjM@ifi.uio.no>
2008-06-24 2:17 ` [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks lm-sensors 2 userspace Robert Hancock
2008-06-24 2:17 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks Robert Hancock
2008-06-24 3:07 ` [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks lm-sensors 2 userspace Linus Torvalds
2008-06-24 3:07 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks Linus Torvalds
2008-06-24 3:47 ` [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks lm-sensors 2 userspace Zhang Rui
2008-06-24 3:47 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks Zhang Rui
2008-06-24 12:14 ` [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks lm-sensors 2 userspace Mark M. Hoffman
2008-06-24 12:14 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks Mark M. Hoffman
2008-06-24 17:38 ` [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks lm-sensors 2 userspace Rene Herman
2008-06-24 17:38 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks Rene Herman
2008-06-25 23:12 ` [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks lm-sensors 2 userspace Len Brown
2008-06-25 23:12 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks Len Brown
2008-06-26 0:17 ` [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks lm-sensors 2 userspace Matthew Garrett
2008-06-26 0:17 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks Matthew Garrett
2008-06-25 23:16 ` [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks lm-sensors 2 userspace Len Brown
2008-06-25 23:16 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks Len Brown
2008-06-25 23:38 ` [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks lm-sensors 2 userspace Rene Herman
2008-06-25 23:38 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks Rene Herman
2008-06-26 0:57 ` [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks lm-sensors 2 userspace Zhang Rui
2008-06-26 0:57 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks Zhang Rui
2008-06-24 6:59 ` [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks lm-sensors 2 userspace Jean Delvare
2008-06-24 6:59 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks Jean Delvare
2008-06-24 9:28 ` Rene Herman [this message]
2008-06-24 9:28 ` Rene Herman
2008-06-24 11:45 ` [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks lm-sensors 2 userspace Mark M. Hoffman
2008-06-24 11:45 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks Mark M. Hoffman
2008-06-23 15:06 [PATCH 2.6.26-rc] ACPI Thermal Zone driver breaks lm-sensors 2 userspace Rene Herman
2008-06-23 17:06 ` Mark M. Hoffman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4860BE4B.10100@keyaccess.nl \
--to=rene.herman@keyaccess.nl \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=j.w.r.degoede@hhs.nl \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=mhoffman@lightlink.com \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.