From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com>,
kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: KVM: pvmmu breakage with gcc 4.3.0
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:47:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48638FE2.1020005@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <486380DB.9070905@qumranet.com>
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> Some pvmmu functions store their commands on stack, and newer GCC
>> versions conclude that these commands are unused.
>>
>> So stick an inline asm statement to convince the compiler otherwise.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
>> index 8b7a3cf..c892752 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
>> @@ -55,6 +55,12 @@ static void kvm_mmu_op(void *buffer, unsigned len)
>> int r;
>> unsigned long a1, a2;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * GCC 4.3.0 concludes that on-stack kvm_mmu_op* is unused and
>> + * optimizes its initialization away.
>> + */
>> + asm ("" : : "p" (buffer));
>> +
>>
>
> I don't think "p" should force the contents into memory? Perhaps
> "m"(*(char *)buffer)?
>
> Anthony, I don't see why a memory clobber would tell gcc that the
> variables is actually used.
It doesn't, but it seems to me that it should force GCC to assume
everything is live. It's a big stick to hit the problem with but it
seems like the right thing semantically.
> The problem is with the void * -> unsigned long cast (__pa), once
> that happens gcc loses track. It's probably needed anyway since
> hypercalls _do_ clobber memory.
Right, it's not telling GCC that we touch a particular variable, but
rather that we may have touched any variable.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-26 12:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-26 2:10 KVM: pvmmu breakage with gcc 4.3.0 Marcelo Tosatti
2008-06-26 3:10 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-06-26 13:18 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-26 18:06 ` Alexandre Oliva
2008-06-29 8:56 ` Avi Kivity
2008-06-26 11:43 ` Avi Kivity
2008-06-26 12:47 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2008-06-27 16:11 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-06-26 15:08 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-26 15:21 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-06-26 15:41 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-06-26 16:34 ` Christian Borntraeger
2008-06-29 10:16 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48638FE2.1020005@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=aoliva@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.