From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@qualcomm.com>,
markmc@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] lguest: Use GSO/IFF_VNET_HDR extensions on tun/tap
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:16:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4863DCF9.20100@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200806261440.43984.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Thursday 26 June 2008 05:07:18 Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
>> Rusty Russell wrote:
>>
>>> @@ -1563,6 +1561,16 @@ static void setup_tun_net(char *arg)
>>> /* Tell Guest what MAC address to use. */
>>> add_feature(dev, VIRTIO_NET_F_MAC);
>>> add_feature(dev, VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY);
>>> + /* Expect Guest to handle everything except UFO */
>>> + add_feature(dev, VIRTIO_NET_F_CSUM);
>>>
>> You're setting this feature twice.
>>
>
> Hmm, not in the version here?
>
Sorry, misread apparently.
>>> + add_feature(dev, VIRTIO_NET_F_GUEST_CSUM);
>>>
>> You set this feature, but I never see the virtio-net driver acknowledge
>> the feature.
I still don't see GUEST_CSUM ever get referenced in virtio_net.c.
What's the intention of this feature bit? Could I be missing a
virtio_net patch? I'm using the latest bits in Linus' tree.
>> Curiously, my implementation with KVM is struggling
>> because UDP packet checksums are not correct so the DHCP client is
>> ignoring them. If I disable CSUM offload, things it works fine (using
>> the virtio-net header). The problem is only host=>guest, guest=>host is
>> fine.
>>
>
> OK, found this: wrong args to skb_partial_csum_set. It was found by Mark
> McLoughlin before, I just lost the fix when I extracted this into a separate
> patch. I chose to move the call to skb_partial_csum_set(), rather than use
> his fix (which assumed a tap not tun device).
>
This still doesn't fix the problem. I can manually assign an IP address
and even do netperf runs but I cannot get a dhcp address (dhclient is
picky about the udp csum). Also, the RX performance is so low that I'm
sure a ton of packets are getting dropped. However, this patchset is
extremely promising, here are the results with KVM for TX:
w/o gso
[ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 593 MBytes 498 Mbits/sec
w/gso
[ 5] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.86 GBytes 1.60 Gbits/sec
So that's a huge increase. Unfortunately, RX drops from 1.04 Gbits/sec
to only a few hundred Kbit/sec. I'm pretty sure this is the
checksumming issue.
Also, when I exit KVM, QEMU zombies and I notice:
Message from syslogd@squirrel at Jun 26 13:02:07 ...
kernel: unregister_netdevice: waiting for tap0 to become free. Usage
count = 3
Message from syslogd@squirrel at Jun 26 13:02:17 ...
kernel: unregister_netdevice: waiting for tap0 to become free. Usage
count = 0
Once the refcount drops to 0, the process exits. It looks fishy to me
though.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
> Here's two fixes on top of previous patch:
>
> diff -u b/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> --- b/drivers/net/tun.c Thu Jun 26 00:21:59 2008 +1000
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c Thu Jun 26 14:35:03 2008 +1000
> @@ -298,11 +298,11 @@
> if ((len -= sizeof(gso)) > count)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - if (gso.hdr_len > len)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> if (memcpy_fromiovec((void *)&gso, iv, sizeof(gso)))
> return -EFAULT;
> +
> + if (gso.hdr_len > len)
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> if ((tun->flags & TUN_TYPE_MASK) == TUN_TAP_DEV) {
> @@ -324,6 +324,16 @@
> return -EFAULT;
> }
>
> + if (gso.flags & VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM) {
> + if (!skb_partial_csum_set(skb, gso.csum_start,
> + gso.csum_offset)) {
> + tun->dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + } else if (tun->flags & TUN_NOCHECKSUM)
> + skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
> +
> switch (tun->flags & TUN_TYPE_MASK) {
> case TUN_TUN_DEV:
> skb_reset_mac_header(skb);
> @@ -335,16 +345,6 @@
> break;
> };
>
> - if (gso.flags & VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_NEEDS_CSUM) {
> - if (!skb_partial_csum_set(skb, gso.csum_start,
> - gso.csum_offset)) {
> - tun->dev->stats.rx_dropped++;
> - kfree_skb(skb);
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> - } else if (tun->flags & TUN_NOCHECKSUM)
> - skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
> -
> if (gso.gso_type != VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_NONE) {
> pr_debug("GSO!\n");
> switch (gso.gso_type & ~VIRTIO_NET_HDR_GSO_ECN) {
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-26 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-25 14:28 [PATCH 1/4] tun: Interface to query tun/tap features Rusty Russell
2008-06-25 14:29 ` [PATCH 2/4] tun: TUNSETFEATURES to set gso features Rusty Russell
2008-06-25 14:30 ` [PATCH 3/4] tun: Allow GSO using virtio_net_hdr Rusty Russell
2008-06-25 14:32 ` [PATCH 4/4] lguest: Use GSO/IFF_VNET_HDR extensions on tun/tap Rusty Russell
2008-06-25 19:07 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-06-25 19:07 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-06-26 4:40 ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-26 4:40 ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-26 18:16 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2008-06-27 3:50 ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-27 3:50 ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-26 18:16 ` Anthony Liguori
2008-07-02 5:25 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-02 5:25 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-25 14:32 ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-25 14:32 ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-25 15:45 ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-25 15:45 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-02 5:13 ` [PATCH 3/4] tun: Allow GSO using virtio_net_hdr Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-02 7:00 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-02 7:00 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-02 5:13 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-24 14:20 ` Herbert Xu
2008-07-24 14:20 ` Herbert Xu
2008-07-24 23:54 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-24 23:54 ` Rusty Russell
2008-06-25 14:30 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-02 5:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] tun: TUNSETFEATURES to set gso features Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-02 5:02 ` Max Krasnyansky
2008-06-25 14:29 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-02 4:59 ` [PATCH 1/4] tun: Interface to query tun/tap features Max Krasnyansky
2008-07-02 5:27 ` David Miller
2008-07-02 5:27 ` David Miller
2008-07-02 4:59 ` Max Krasnyansky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4863DCF9.20100@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=markmc@redhat.com \
--cc=maxk@qualcomm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.