Re: [PATCH 2/2] wss: use stuct snd_wss instead of snd_ad1848

[Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>]

On 03-07-08 14:46, Takashi Iwai wrote:

> At Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:42:00 +0200,
> Rene Herman wrote:

>> Yes these should probably grow as a series with somewhat of a (semi-) 
>> final result being apparent after applying patch N of N. I'm importing 
>> Krzysztof' patches into a "wss" branch in my local git tree and will be 
>> testing them as they come in though -- and frankly, I think it's better 
>> if they come in as he does them a few at a time rather than a large 
>> number at once as it's easier for review purposes.
> 
> Well, I can keep it in a branch if you prefer.  Just let me know.

If that is to me specifically, I don't really care. "git am" is a very 
useful tool.

>> But as far as I'm concerned you could just sit back until the series is 
>> somewhat "complete".
> 
> OK.  As 2.6.26 will come out soon, it's a bit too late to include
> such a big change for 2.6.27.  So we have still some time :)

If Krzysztof is anything like me, he's not mucking around with ISA stuff 
due to compatibility with deadlines, so there's even going to be kernels 
after 2.6.28 I'd say... :-)

Rene.