All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Christoph Lameter <clameter@linux-foundation.org>,
	Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.cz>,
	Virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Xen devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Thomas Friebel <thomas.friebel@amd.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86, paravirt-spinlocks: fix boot hang
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:55:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4874DF7F.4080204@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080709134944.GA15190@elte.hu>

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
>   
>> the patches caused a boot hang with this config:
>>
>>  http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Wed_Jul__9_14_47_04_CEST_2008.bad
>>     
>
> ok, fixed it via the patch below.
>
> 	Ingo
>
> -------------->
> commit 6412367fe22dc54cc727e7bec5bd65c36c1a0754
> Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Date:   Wed Jul 9 15:42:09 2008 +0200
>
>     x86, paravirt-spinlocks: fix boot hang
>     
>     the paravirt-spinlock patches caused a boot hang with this config:
>     
>      http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Wed_Jul__9_14_47_04_CEST_2008.bad
>     
>     i have bisected it down to:
>     
>     |  commit e17b58c2e85bc2ad2afc07fb8d898017c2b75ed1
>     |  Author: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
>     |  Date:   Mon Jul 7 12:07:53 2008 -0700
>     |
>     |      xen: implement Xen-specific spinlocks
>     
>     i.e. applying that patch alone causes the hang. The hang happens in the
>     ftrace self-test:
>     
>       initcall utsname_sysctl_init+0x0/0x19 returned 0 after 0 msecs
>       calling  init_sched_switch_trace+0x0/0x4c
>       Testing tracer sched_switch: PASSED
>       initcall init_sched_switch_trace+0x0/0x4c returned 0 after 167 msecs
>       calling  init_function_trace+0x0/0x12
>       Testing tracer ftrace:
>       [hard hang]
>     
>     it should have continued like this:
>     
>       Testing tracer ftrace: PASSED
>       initcall init_function_trace+0x0/0x12 returned 0 after 198 msecs
>       calling  init_irqsoff_tracer+0x0/0x14
>       Testing tracer irqsoff: PASSED
>       initcall init_irqsoff_tracer+0x0/0x14 returned 0 after 3 msecs
>       calling  init_mmio_trace+0x0/0x12
>       initcall init_mmio_trace+0x0/0x12 returned 0 after 0 msecs
>     
>     the problem is that such lowlevel primitives as spinlocks should never
>     be built with -pg (which ftrace does). Marking paravirt.o as non-pg and
>     marking all spinlock ops as always-inline solve the hang.
>    

Thanks Ingo, that would have taken me a while to work out.

Presumably that means that xen/smp.o should also be built without -pg.  
In fact, should I move the spinlock code into its own file, so that 
ftrace can cover as much as it can?

    J

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-09 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-07 19:07 [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirtual spinlocks Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-07 19:07 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-07 19:07 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] x86/paravirt: add hooks for spinlock operations Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-07 19:07   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-07 19:07 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-07 19:07 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] paravirt: introduce a "lock-byte" spinlock implementation Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-07 19:07   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-07 19:07 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-07 19:07 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] xen: use lock-byte " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-07 19:07   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-07 19:07 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-07 19:07 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] xen: implement Xen-specific spinlocks Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-07 19:07   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-08  6:37   ` Johannes Weiner
2008-07-08  6:37   ` Johannes Weiner
2008-07-08  7:15     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-08  7:15       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-08  7:30       ` Johannes Weiner
2008-07-08  7:30       ` Johannes Weiner
2008-07-08  7:15     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-08  0:29 ` [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirtual spinlocks Rusty Russell
2008-07-08  0:29 ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-08  0:37   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-08  0:37     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-08  1:01     ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-08  1:01     ` Rusty Russell
2008-07-08  0:37   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-08  4:51   ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-08  4:51     ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-08  5:28     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-08  5:28       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-08  5:28     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-07-08  4:51   ` Nick Piggin
2008-07-09 12:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 12:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 12:28   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 12:35   ` [patch] x86: paravirt spinlocks, !CONFIG_SMP build fixes (was: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirtual spinlocks) Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 12:35     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 12:35   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 12:39   ` [patch] x86: paravirt spinlocks, modular build fix " Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 12:39     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 12:39   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 13:33   ` [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirtual spinlocks Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 13:33   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 13:33     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 13:49     ` [patch] x86, paravirt-spinlocks: fix boot hang (was: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/4] Paravirtual spinlocks) Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 13:49     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 13:49       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 15:55       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-07-09 19:26         ` [patch] x86, paravirt-spinlocks: fix boot hang Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 19:26         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 19:26           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-09 15:55       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4874DF7F.4080204@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=avi@qumranet.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=clameter@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=ptesarik@suse.cz \
    --cc=thomas.friebel@amd.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.