All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Alan Clucas <alanc@pipstechnology.co.uk>,
	Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de>,
	lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH] Support for DS75 thermal sensor
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 10:39:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <487F2157.90604@grandegger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080717073312.GB30474@secretlab.ca>

Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 09:31:24AM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> Jean Delvare wrote:
>>> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:18:26 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
>>>> I've found this thread now. Why can't we totally remove probing from
>>>> i2c-mpc? These are embedded systems, not open boxes like a PC. If a
>>>> i2c client hasn't been converted to the new model yet, convert it
>>>> before deploying with the new i2c-mpc driver.  It's not very hard to
>>>> convert the client drivers.
>>> I tend to agree. And the number of unconverted drivers is getting very
>>> low these days. Only 2 RTC drivers are left, and by the end of the day,
>>> almost all hwmon drivers will be converted as well.
>> Thinking more about it I also prefer removing the I2C_CLASS_HWMON flag  
>> completely. It just affects HWMON devices anyhow and if there is still  
>> an old style driver around, it should be converted.
> 
> I'm cool with that.

Good, just sent a new patch.

Wolfgang.

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Alan Clucas <alanc@pipstechnology.co.uk>,
	Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de>,
	lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Support for DS75 thermal sensor
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:39:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <487F2157.90604@grandegger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080717073312.GB30474@secretlab.ca>

Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 09:31:24AM +0200, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
>> Jean Delvare wrote:
>>> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:18:26 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
>>>> I've found this thread now. Why can't we totally remove probing from
>>>> i2c-mpc? These are embedded systems, not open boxes like a PC. If a
>>>> i2c client hasn't been converted to the new model yet, convert it
>>>> before deploying with the new i2c-mpc driver.  It's not very hard to
>>>> convert the client drivers.
>>> I tend to agree. And the number of unconverted drivers is getting very
>>> low these days. Only 2 RTC drivers are left, and by the end of the day,
>>> almost all hwmon drivers will be converted as well.
>> Thinking more about it I also prefer removing the I2C_CLASS_HWMON flag  
>> completely. It just affects HWMON devices anyhow and if there is still  
>> an old style driver around, it should be converted.
> 
> I'm cool with that.

Good, just sent a new patch.

Wolfgang.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-17 10:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-08  9:22 [lm-sensors] [PATCH] Support for DS75 thermal sensor Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-08  9:53 ` Jean Delvare
2008-07-08 13:09 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-08 13:29 ` Jean Delvare
2008-07-08 13:38 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-11 12:40 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-11 12:56 ` Jean Delvare
2008-07-16  9:12   ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-16  9:12     ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-16  9:33     ` Jean Delvare
2008-07-16  9:33       ` Jean Delvare
2008-07-16  9:50       ` [lm-sensors] " Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-16  9:50         ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-16 10:10         ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2008-07-16 10:10           ` Jean Delvare
2008-07-16 10:23           ` [lm-sensors] " Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-16 10:23             ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-16 14:08           ` [lm-sensors] " Grant Likely
2008-07-16 14:08             ` Grant Likely
2008-07-16 14:18             ` [lm-sensors] " Jon Smirl
2008-07-16 14:18               ` Jon Smirl
2008-07-16 14:29               ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2008-07-16 14:29                 ` Jean Delvare
2008-07-17  7:31                 ` [lm-sensors] " Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-17  7:31                   ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2008-07-17  7:33                   ` [lm-sensors] " Grant Likely
2008-07-17  7:33                     ` Grant Likely
2008-07-17 10:39                     ` Wolfgang Grandegger [this message]
2008-07-17 10:39                       ` Wolfgang Grandegger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=487F2157.90604@grandegger.com \
    --to=wg@grandegger.com \
    --cc=Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=alanc@pipstechnology.co.uk \
    --cc=dzu@denx.de \
    --cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.