[Buildroot] phy driver

[Buildroot] phy driver

[Joseph G. Boike]

I've updated the phy driver for smsc devices (smsc.c ).
(Which is a question in itself; where do I submit the patch?)
It had worked fine with 2.6.22 but 2.6.25 & 2.6.26 seem to have a 
preference for the generic driver @ phy address 0 over my h/w specific 
driver for the phy @ phy address 0x1F.
Any suggestions?
Regards,
Joe

[Buildroot] phy driver

[Peter Korsgaard]

>>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph G Boike <joe.boike@acsatlanta.com> writes:

Hi,

 Joseph> I've updated the phy driver for smsc devices (smsc.c ).
 Joseph> (Which is a question in itself; where do I submit the patch?)
 Joseph> It had worked fine with 2.6.22 but 2.6.25 & 2.6.26 seem to
 Joseph> have a preference for the generic driver @ phy address 0 over
 Joseph> my h/w specific driver for the phy @ phy address 0x1F.  Any
 Joseph> suggestions?  Regards, Joe

Wrong list - I guess you meant to send this to netdev at vger.kernel.org
instead?

-- 
Bye, Peter Korsgaard

[Buildroot] phy driver

[Thiago A. Corrêa]

Hi Joseph,

   That's a question that's better asked in one of the kernel mailing
lists. There might be a list specific to network drivers, but perhaps
LKML is a good place to start.

Kind Regards,
    Thiago A. Correa

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Joseph G. Boike
<joe.boike@acsatlanta.com> wrote:
> I've updated the phy driver for smsc devices (smsc.c ).
> (Which is a question in itself; where do I submit the patch?)
> It had worked fine with 2.6.22 but 2.6.25 & 2.6.26 seem to have a
> preference for the generic driver @ phy address 0 over my h/w specific
> driver for the phy @ phy address 0x1F.
> Any suggestions?
> Regards,
> Joe
>
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at uclibc.org
> http://busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
>