* incorrect entries in /etc/netconfig @ 2008-07-01 20:30 Chuck Lever 2008-07-08 17:40 ` Steve Dickson 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Chuck Lever @ 2008-07-01 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Steve Dickson; +Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List Hi Steve- I'm trying out setconfigent() and friends from the new libtirpc. It looks like the entries in the stock /etc/netconfig on Fedora are incorrect compared with Solaris. My Fedora 8 system has this: udp tpi_clts v inet udp - - tcp tpi_cots_ord v inet tcp - - udp6 tpi_clts - inet6 udp6 - - tcp6 tpi_cots_ord - inet6 tcp6 - - but my OpenSolaris 2008.5 system has this: udp6 tpi_clts v inet6 udp /dev/udp6 - tcp6 tpi_cots_ord v inet6 tcp /dev/tcp6 - udp tpi_clts v inet udp /dev/udp - tcp tpi_cots_ord v inet tcp /dev/tcp - Note the contents of the fifth field in each row. The Fedora netconfig has "udp6" and "tcp6" as the protonames, which I think is incorrect. These should be "udp" and "tcp". Only the netids (the first field) should have the extra "6" suffix. The protocol names should always be "udp" or "tcp", no matter which address family is used. Can you fix this up in the libtirpc package? -- Chuck Lever chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: incorrect entries in /etc/netconfig 2008-07-01 20:30 incorrect entries in /etc/netconfig Chuck Lever @ 2008-07-08 17:40 ` Steve Dickson [not found] ` <4873A681.5080409-AfCzQyP5zfLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Steve Dickson @ 2008-07-08 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chuck Lever; +Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List Sorry for taking soo long to address this... Chuck Lever wrote: > Hi Steve- > > I'm trying out setconfigent() and friends from the new libtirpc. > > It looks like the entries in the stock /etc/netconfig on Fedora are > incorrect compared with Solaris. My Fedora 8 system has this: > > udp tpi_clts v inet udp - - > tcp tpi_cots_ord v inet tcp - - > udp6 tpi_clts - inet6 udp6 - - > tcp6 tpi_cots_ord - inet6 tcp6 - - > > but my OpenSolaris 2008.5 system has this: > > udp6 tpi_clts v inet6 udp /dev/udp6 - > tcp6 tpi_cots_ord v inet6 tcp /dev/tcp6 - > udp tpi_clts v inet udp /dev/udp - > tcp tpi_cots_ord v inet tcp /dev/tcp - > > Note the contents of the fifth field in each row. The Fedora netconfig > has "udp6" and "tcp6" as the protonames, which I think is incorrect. > These should be "udp" and "tcp". Only the netids (the first field) > should have the extra "6" suffix. The protocol names should always be > "udp" or "tcp", no matter which address family is used. > > Can you fix this up in the libtirpc package? It is in later releases... to be honest I'm not sure how it got that way.. It did not seem to be broken in the stock F8 (libtirpc-0.1.7-12), F9 or rawhide packages steved. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <4873A681.5080409-AfCzQyP5zfLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: incorrect entries in /etc/netconfig [not found] ` <4873A681.5080409-AfCzQyP5zfLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-07-09 1:44 ` Chuck Lever 2008-07-25 18:32 ` Chuck Lever 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Chuck Lever @ 2008-07-09 1:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Steve Dickson; +Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List On Jul 8, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: > Sorry for taking soo long to address this... > > Chuck Lever wrote: >> Hi Steve- >> >> I'm trying out setconfigent() and friends from the new libtirpc. >> >> It looks like the entries in the stock /etc/netconfig on Fedora are >> incorrect compared with Solaris. My Fedora 8 system has this: >> >> udp tpi_clts v inet udp - - >> tcp tpi_cots_ord v inet tcp - - >> udp6 tpi_clts - inet6 udp6 - - >> tcp6 tpi_cots_ord - inet6 tcp6 - - >> >> but my OpenSolaris 2008.5 system has this: >> >> udp6 tpi_clts v inet6 udp /dev/udp6 - >> tcp6 tpi_cots_ord v inet6 tcp /dev/tcp6 - >> udp tpi_clts v inet udp /dev/udp - >> tcp tpi_cots_ord v inet tcp /dev/tcp - >> >> Note the contents of the fifth field in each row. The Fedora >> netconfig >> has "udp6" and "tcp6" as the protonames, which I think is incorrect. >> These should be "udp" and "tcp". Only the netids (the first field) >> should have the extra "6" suffix. The protocol names should always >> be >> "udp" or "tcp", no matter which address family is used. >> >> Can you fix this up in the libtirpc package? > It is in later releases... to be honest I'm not sure how > it got that way.. It did not seem to be broken in the > stock F8 (libtirpc-0.1.7-12), F9 or rawhide packages Thanks, I'll keep an eye out. -- Chuck Lever chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: incorrect entries in /etc/netconfig [not found] ` <4873A681.5080409-AfCzQyP5zfLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 2008-07-09 1:44 ` Chuck Lever @ 2008-07-25 18:32 ` Chuck Lever 2008-07-25 21:24 ` Steve Dickson 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Chuck Lever @ 2008-07-25 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Steve Dickson; +Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List On Jul 8, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: > Sorry for taking soo long to address this... > > Chuck Lever wrote: >> Hi Steve- >> >> I'm trying out setconfigent() and friends from the new libtirpc. >> >> It looks like the entries in the stock /etc/netconfig on Fedora are >> incorrect compared with Solaris. My Fedora 8 system has this: >> >> udp tpi_clts v inet udp - - >> tcp tpi_cots_ord v inet tcp - - >> udp6 tpi_clts - inet6 udp6 - - >> tcp6 tpi_cots_ord - inet6 tcp6 - - >> >> but my OpenSolaris 2008.5 system has this: >> >> udp6 tpi_clts v inet6 udp /dev/udp6 - >> tcp6 tpi_cots_ord v inet6 tcp /dev/tcp6 - >> udp tpi_clts v inet udp /dev/udp - >> tcp tpi_cots_ord v inet tcp /dev/tcp - >> >> Note the contents of the fifth field in each row. The Fedora >> netconfig >> has "udp6" and "tcp6" as the protonames, which I think is incorrect. >> These should be "udp" and "tcp". Only the netids (the first field) >> should have the extra "6" suffix. The protocol names should always >> be >> "udp" or "tcp", no matter which address family is used. >> >> Can you fix this up in the libtirpc package? > It is in later releases... to be honest I'm not sure how > it got that way.. It did not seem to be broken in the > stock F8 (libtirpc-0.1.7-12), F9 or rawhide packages FYI: I just hit this again on a fairly fresh F9 install. I wonder if installing libtirpc-devel breaks /etc/netconfig? -- Chuck Lever chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: incorrect entries in /etc/netconfig 2008-07-25 18:32 ` Chuck Lever @ 2008-07-25 21:24 ` Steve Dickson [not found] ` <488A448E.3070400-AfCzQyP5zfLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Steve Dickson @ 2008-07-25 21:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chuck Lever; +Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List Chuck Lever wrote: > On Jul 8, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: >> Sorry for taking soo long to address this... >> >> Chuck Lever wrote: >>> Hi Steve- >>> >>> I'm trying out setconfigent() and friends from the new libtirpc. >>> >>> It looks like the entries in the stock /etc/netconfig on Fedora are >>> incorrect compared with Solaris. My Fedora 8 system has this: >>> >>> udp tpi_clts v inet udp - - >>> tcp tpi_cots_ord v inet tcp - - >>> udp6 tpi_clts - inet6 udp6 - - >>> tcp6 tpi_cots_ord - inet6 tcp6 - - >>> >>> but my OpenSolaris 2008.5 system has this: >>> >>> udp6 tpi_clts v inet6 udp /dev/udp6 - >>> tcp6 tpi_cots_ord v inet6 tcp /dev/tcp6 - >>> udp tpi_clts v inet udp /dev/udp - >>> tcp tpi_cots_ord v inet tcp /dev/tcp - >>> >>> Note the contents of the fifth field in each row. The Fedora netconfig >>> has "udp6" and "tcp6" as the protonames, which I think is incorrect. >>> These should be "udp" and "tcp". Only the netids (the first field) >>> should have the extra "6" suffix. The protocol names should always be >>> "udp" or "tcp", no matter which address family is used. >>> >>> Can you fix this up in the libtirpc package? >> It is in later releases... to be honest I'm not sure how >> it got that way.. It did not seem to be broken in the >> stock F8 (libtirpc-0.1.7-12), F9 or rawhide packages > > FYI: I just hit this again on a fairly fresh F9 install. > > I wonder if installing libtirpc-devel breaks /etc/netconfig? Is there a /etc/netconfig.rpmnew file? steved. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <488A448E.3070400-AfCzQyP5zfLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: incorrect entries in /etc/netconfig [not found] ` <488A448E.3070400-AfCzQyP5zfLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-07-25 22:58 ` Chuck Lever 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Chuck Lever @ 2008-07-25 22:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Steve Dickson; +Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List On Jul 25, 2008, at 5:24 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: > Chuck Lever wrote: >> On Jul 8, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Steve Dickson wrote: >>> Sorry for taking soo long to address this... >>> >>> Chuck Lever wrote: >>>> Hi Steve- >>>> >>>> I'm trying out setconfigent() and friends from the new libtirpc. >>>> >>>> It looks like the entries in the stock /etc/netconfig on Fedora are >>>> incorrect compared with Solaris. My Fedora 8 system has this: >>>> >>>> udp tpi_clts v inet udp - - >>>> tcp tpi_cots_ord v inet tcp - - >>>> udp6 tpi_clts - inet6 udp6 - - >>>> tcp6 tpi_cots_ord - inet6 tcp6 - - >>>> >>>> but my OpenSolaris 2008.5 system has this: >>>> >>>> udp6 tpi_clts v inet6 udp /dev/udp6 - >>>> tcp6 tpi_cots_ord v inet6 tcp /dev/tcp6 - >>>> udp tpi_clts v inet udp /dev/udp - >>>> tcp tpi_cots_ord v inet tcp /dev/tcp - >>>> >>>> Note the contents of the fifth field in each row. The Fedora >>>> netconfig >>>> has "udp6" and "tcp6" as the protonames, which I think is >>>> incorrect. >>>> These should be "udp" and "tcp". Only the netids (the first field) >>>> should have the extra "6" suffix. The protocol names should >>>> always be >>>> "udp" or "tcp", no matter which address family is used. >>>> >>>> Can you fix this up in the libtirpc package? >>> It is in later releases... to be honest I'm not sure how >>> it got that way.. It did not seem to be broken in the >>> stock F8 (libtirpc-0.1.7-12), F9 or rawhide packages >> >> FYI: I just hit this again on a fairly fresh F9 install. >> >> I wonder if installing libtirpc-devel breaks /etc/netconfig? > Is there a /etc/netconfig.rpmnew file? [cel@tarkus nfs-2.6]$ ls -l /etc/netcon* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 768 2008-07-25 14:24 [cel@tarkus nfs-2.6]$ The date is today because I just removed the "6"es. -- Chuck Lever chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-07-25 22:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-07-01 20:30 incorrect entries in /etc/netconfig Chuck Lever
2008-07-08 17:40 ` Steve Dickson
[not found] ` <4873A681.5080409-AfCzQyP5zfLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-09 1:44 ` Chuck Lever
2008-07-25 18:32 ` Chuck Lever
2008-07-25 21:24 ` Steve Dickson
[not found] ` <488A448E.3070400-AfCzQyP5zfLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-25 22:58 ` Chuck Lever
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.