Re: Remove conf/*.mk from svn

[Christian Franke <Christian.Franke@t-online.de>]

Pavel Roskin wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 20:41 +0200, Christian Franke wrote:
>
>   
>> I agree, the files generated by ./autogen.sh should be included in 
>> tarball, but not in the repo.
>> Additional prerequisites (autoconf, ruby) for builds from svn are IMO OK.
>>     
>
> I agree.
>
> At least we should put a message into *.mk files that would make it
> clear that they are generated.
>
>   

Yes.

For a release tarball, It IMO also makes sense to include 
util/parser.tab.c. It is platform-independent and rarely changed. This 
would remove bison from the list of prerequisites.


>> BTW: autogen.sh should "touch stamp-h.in" to be consistent with the 
>> Makefile rule for config.h.in.
>>     
>
> What difference would it make?
>
>   


$ patch < patch_changing_configure.ac_or_aclocal.m4

$ ./autogen.sh # runs autoheader etc.

$ ./configure

$ make # re-runs autoheader because stamp-h.in was not updated

Christian