[BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[Mikael Pettersson]

While investigating a report in linux.debian.ports.sparc
saying that X doesn't work with the 2.6.24 kernel, I noticed
that while X works for me with 2.6.25, 2.6.24, and Aurora's
2.6.23 kernels, it doesn't work with any 2.6.26-rcN (1<=N<=4)
kernel; with those it always fails with a

Fatal server error:
xf86MapPciMem: Could not mmap PCI memory [base=0xe2000000,hostbase=0xe2000000,size 00] (No such file or directory)

I'll start digging through 2.6.25->2.6.26-rc1 later today,
meanwhile I've put Xorg.0.log, Xorg strace, dmesg, and .config
files for 2.6.25 (working) and 2.6.26-rc4 (failing) in
<http://user.it.uu.se/~mikpe/linux/sparc64-2.6.26-rcN-xorg-bug/>.

/Mikael

[BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[Mikael Pettersson]

While investigating a report in linux.debian.ports.sparc
saying that X doesn't work with the 2.6.24 kernel, I noticed
that while X works for me with 2.6.25, 2.6.24, and Aurora's
2.6.23 kernels, it doesn't work with any 2.6.26-rcN (1<=N<=4)
kernel; with those it always fails with a

Fatal server error:
xf86MapPciMem: Could not mmap PCI memory [base=0xe2000000,hostbase=0xe2000000,size=2000] (No such file or directory)

I'll start digging through 2.6.25->2.6.26-rc1 later today,
meanwhile I've put Xorg.0.log, Xorg strace, dmesg, and .config
files for 2.6.25 (working) and 2.6.26-rc4 (failing) in
<http://user.it.uu.se/~mikpe/linux/sparc64-2.6.26-rcN-xorg-bug/>.

/Mikael

Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[David Miller]

From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 09:35:52 +0200

> Fatal server error:
> xf86MapPciMem: Could not mmap PCI memory [base=0xe2000000,hostbase=0xe2000000,size 00] (No such file or directory)
> 
> I'll start digging through 2.6.25->2.6.26-rc1 later today,
> meanwhile I've put Xorg.0.log, Xorg strace, dmesg, and .config
> files for 2.6.25 (working) and 2.6.26-rc4 (failing) in
> <http://user.it.uu.se/~mikpe/linux/sparc64-2.6.26-rcN-xorg-bug/>.

It's likely this change below.  Unfortunately older versions of X
seemingly cannot cope with a lack of PCI host controller in the PCI
hierarchy exported by the kernel.

That's really a bug in X, current libpciaccess based X servers work
fine, and the bug fixed by this changeset is not solvable in any other
reasonable way.  So unfortunately older X verions will stay not
working.  Sorry.

commit c26d3c0138970778fabe114df99dffb34a04b1d7
Author: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu May 1 01:12:40 2008 -0700

    sparc64: Stop creating dummy root PCI host controller devices.
    
    It just creates confusion, errors, and bugs.
    
    For one thing, this can cause dup sysfs or procfs nodes to get
    created:
    
    [    1.198015] proc_dir_entry '00.0' already registered
    [    1.198036] Call Trace:
    [    1.198052]  [00000000004f2534] create_proc_entry+0x7c/0x98
    [    1.198092]  [00000000005719e4] pci_proc_attach_device+0xa4/0xd4
    [    1.198126]  [00000000007d991c] pci_proc_init+0x64/0x88
    [    1.198158]  [00000000007c62a4] kernel_init+0x190/0x330
    [    1.198183]  [0000000000426cf8] kernel_thread+0x38/0x48
    [    1.198210]  [00000000006a0d90] rest_init+0x18/0x5c
    
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

diff --git a/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c
index dbf2fc2..112b09f 100644
--- a/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c
+++ b/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c
@@ -350,8 +350,7 @@ static void pci_parse_of_addrs(struct of_device *op,
 
 struct pci_dev *of_create_pci_dev(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
 				  struct device_node *node,
-				  struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn,
-				  int host_controller)
+				  struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn)
 {
 	struct dev_archdata *sd;
 	struct pci_dev *dev;
@@ -390,43 +389,28 @@ struct pci_dev *of_create_pci_dev(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
 	dev->devfn = devfn;
 	dev->multifunction = 0;		/* maybe a lie? */
 
-	if (host_controller) {
-		if (tlb_type != hypervisor) {
-			pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_VENDOR_ID,
-					     &dev->vendor);
-			pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_DEVICE_ID,
-					     &dev->device);
-		} else {
-			dev->vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_SUN;
-			dev->device = 0x80f0;
-		}
-		dev->cfg_size = 256;
-		dev->class = PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST << 8;
-		sprintf(pci_name(dev), "%04x:%02x:%02x.%d", pci_domain_nr(bus),
-			0x00, PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn));
-	} else {
-		dev->vendor = of_getintprop_default(node, "vendor-id", 0xffff);
-		dev->device = of_getintprop_default(node, "device-id", 0xffff);
-		dev->subsystem_vendor -			of_getintprop_default(node, "subsystem-vendor-id", 0);
-		dev->subsystem_device -			of_getintprop_default(node, "subsystem-id", 0);
-
-		dev->cfg_size = pci_cfg_space_size(dev);
-
-		/* We can't actually use the firmware value, we have
-		 * to read what is in the register right now.  One
-		 * reason is that in the case of IDE interfaces the
-		 * firmware can sample the value before the the IDE
-		 * interface is programmed into native mode.
-		 */
-		pci_read_config_dword(dev, PCI_CLASS_REVISION, &class);
-		dev->class = class >> 8;
-		dev->revision = class & 0xff;
+	dev->vendor = of_getintprop_default(node, "vendor-id", 0xffff);
+	dev->device = of_getintprop_default(node, "device-id", 0xffff);
+	dev->subsystem_vendor +		of_getintprop_default(node, "subsystem-vendor-id", 0);
+	dev->subsystem_device +		of_getintprop_default(node, "subsystem-id", 0);
+
+	dev->cfg_size = pci_cfg_space_size(dev);
+
+	/* We can't actually use the firmware value, we have
+	 * to read what is in the register right now.  One
+	 * reason is that in the case of IDE interfaces the
+	 * firmware can sample the value before the the IDE
+	 * interface is programmed into native mode.
+	 */
+	pci_read_config_dword(dev, PCI_CLASS_REVISION, &class);
+	dev->class = class >> 8;
+	dev->revision = class & 0xff;
+
+	sprintf(pci_name(dev), "%04x:%02x:%02x.%d", pci_domain_nr(bus),
+		dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn));
 
-		sprintf(pci_name(dev), "%04x:%02x:%02x.%d", pci_domain_nr(bus),
-			dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn));
-	}
 	if (ofpci_verbose)
 		printk("    class: 0x%x device name: %s\n",
 		       dev->class, pci_name(dev));
@@ -441,26 +425,21 @@ struct pci_dev *of_create_pci_dev(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
 	dev->current_state = 4;		/* unknown power state */
 	dev->error_state = pci_channel_io_normal;
 
-	if (host_controller) {
+	if (!strcmp(type, "pci") || !strcmp(type, "pciex")) {
+		/* a PCI-PCI bridge */
 		dev->hdr_type = PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE;
 		dev->rom_base_reg = PCI_ROM_ADDRESS1;
-		dev->irq = PCI_IRQ_NONE;
+	} else if (!strcmp(type, "cardbus")) {
+		dev->hdr_type = PCI_HEADER_TYPE_CARDBUS;
 	} else {
-		if (!strcmp(type, "pci") || !strcmp(type, "pciex")) {
-			/* a PCI-PCI bridge */
-			dev->hdr_type = PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE;
-			dev->rom_base_reg = PCI_ROM_ADDRESS1;
-		} else if (!strcmp(type, "cardbus")) {
-			dev->hdr_type = PCI_HEADER_TYPE_CARDBUS;
-		} else {
-			dev->hdr_type = PCI_HEADER_TYPE_NORMAL;
-			dev->rom_base_reg = PCI_ROM_ADDRESS;
+		dev->hdr_type = PCI_HEADER_TYPE_NORMAL;
+		dev->rom_base_reg = PCI_ROM_ADDRESS;
 
-			dev->irq = sd->op->irqs[0];
-			if (dev->irq = 0xffffffff)
-				dev->irq = PCI_IRQ_NONE;
-		}
+		dev->irq = sd->op->irqs[0];
+		if (dev->irq = 0xffffffff)
+			dev->irq = PCI_IRQ_NONE;
 	}
+
 	pci_parse_of_addrs(sd->op, node, dev);
 
 	if (ofpci_verbose)
@@ -749,7 +728,7 @@ static void __devinit pci_of_scan_bus(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
 		prev_devfn = devfn;
 
 		/* create a new pci_dev for this device */
-		dev = of_create_pci_dev(pbm, child, bus, devfn, 0);
+		dev = of_create_pci_dev(pbm, child, bus, devfn);
 		if (!dev)
 			continue;
 		if (ofpci_verbose)
@@ -796,48 +775,9 @@ static void __devinit pci_bus_register_of_sysfs(struct pci_bus *bus)
 		pci_bus_register_of_sysfs(child_bus);
 }
 
-int pci_host_bridge_read_pci_cfg(struct pci_bus *bus_dev,
-				 unsigned int devfn,
-				 int where, int size,
-				 u32 *value)
-{
-	static u8 fake_pci_config[] = {
-		0x8e, 0x10, /* Vendor: 0x108e (Sun) */
-		0xf0, 0x80, /* Device: 0x80f0 (Fire) */
-		0x46, 0x01, /* Command: 0x0146 (SERR, PARITY, MASTER, MEM) */
-		0xa0, 0x22, /* Status: 0x02a0 (DEVSEL_MED, FB2B, 66MHZ) */
-		0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x06, /* Class: 0x06000000 host bridge */
-		0x00, /* Cacheline: 0x00 */
-		0x40, /* Latency: 0x40 */
-		0x00, /* Header-Type: 0x00 normal */
-	};
-
-	*value = 0;
-	if (where >= 0 && where < sizeof(fake_pci_config) &&
-	    (where + size) >= 0 &&
-	    (where + size) < sizeof(fake_pci_config) &&
-	    size <= sizeof(u32)) {
-		while (size--) {
-			*value <<= 8;
-			*value |= fake_pci_config[where + size];
-		}
-	}
-
-	return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
-}
-
-int pci_host_bridge_write_pci_cfg(struct pci_bus *bus_dev,
-				  unsigned int devfn,
-				  int where, int size,
-				  u32 value)
-{
-	return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
-}
-
 struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_scan_one_pbm(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm)
 {
 	struct device_node *node = pbm->prom_node;
-	struct pci_dev *host_pdev;
 	struct pci_bus *bus;
 
 	printk("PCI: Scanning PBM %s\n", node->full_name);
@@ -855,10 +795,6 @@ struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_scan_one_pbm(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm)
 	bus->resource[0] = &pbm->io_space;
 	bus->resource[1] = &pbm->mem_space;
 
-	/* Create the dummy host bridge and link it in.  */
-	host_pdev = of_create_pci_dev(pbm, node, bus, 0x00, 1);
-	bus->self = host_pdev;
-
 	pci_of_scan_bus(pbm, node, bus);
 	pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
 	pci_bus_register_of_sysfs(bus);
diff --git a/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci_common.c b/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci_common.c
index 923e0bc..19fa621 100644
--- a/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci_common.c
+++ b/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci_common.c
@@ -264,9 +264,6 @@ static int sun4v_read_pci_cfg(struct pci_bus *bus_dev, unsigned int devfn,
 	unsigned int func = PCI_FUNC(devfn);
 	unsigned long ret;
 
-	if (!bus && devfn = 0x00)
-		return pci_host_bridge_read_pci_cfg(bus_dev, devfn, where,
-						    size, value);
 	if (config_out_of_range(pbm, bus, devfn, where)) {
 		ret = ~0UL;
 	} else {
@@ -300,9 +297,6 @@ static int sun4v_write_pci_cfg(struct pci_bus *bus_dev, unsigned int devfn,
 	unsigned int func = PCI_FUNC(devfn);
 	unsigned long ret;
 
-	if (!bus && devfn = 0x00)
-		return pci_host_bridge_write_pci_cfg(bus_dev, devfn, where,
-						     size, value);
 	if (config_out_of_range(pbm, bus, devfn, where)) {
 		/* Do nothing. */
 	} else {
diff --git a/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci_impl.h b/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci_impl.h
index 218bac4..c385d12 100644
--- a/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci_impl.h
+++ b/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci_impl.h
@@ -167,15 +167,6 @@ extern void pci_get_pbm_props(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm);
 extern struct pci_bus *pci_scan_one_pbm(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm);
 extern void pci_determine_mem_io_space(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm);
 
-extern int pci_host_bridge_read_pci_cfg(struct pci_bus *bus_dev,
-					unsigned int devfn,
-					int where, int size,
-					u32 *value);
-extern int pci_host_bridge_write_pci_cfg(struct pci_bus *bus_dev,
-					 unsigned int devfn,
-					 int where, int size,
-					 u32 value);
-
 /* Error reporting support. */
 extern void pci_scan_for_target_abort(struct pci_pbm_info *, struct pci_bus *);
 extern void pci_scan_for_master_abort(struct pci_pbm_info *, struct pci_bus *);

Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[David Miller]

From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 09:35:52 +0200

> Fatal server error:
> xf86MapPciMem: Could not mmap PCI memory [base=0xe2000000,hostbase=0xe2000000,size=2000] (No such file or directory)
> 
> I'll start digging through 2.6.25->2.6.26-rc1 later today,
> meanwhile I've put Xorg.0.log, Xorg strace, dmesg, and .config
> files for 2.6.25 (working) and 2.6.26-rc4 (failing) in
> <http://user.it.uu.se/~mikpe/linux/sparc64-2.6.26-rcN-xorg-bug/>.

It's likely this change below.  Unfortunately older versions of X
seemingly cannot cope with a lack of PCI host controller in the PCI
hierarchy exported by the kernel.

That's really a bug in X, current libpciaccess based X servers work
fine, and the bug fixed by this changeset is not solvable in any other
reasonable way.  So unfortunately older X verions will stay not
working.  Sorry.

commit c26d3c0138970778fabe114df99dffb34a04b1d7
Author: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu May 1 01:12:40 2008 -0700

    sparc64: Stop creating dummy root PCI host controller devices.
    
    It just creates confusion, errors, and bugs.
    
    For one thing, this can cause dup sysfs or procfs nodes to get
    created:
    
    [    1.198015] proc_dir_entry '00.0' already registered
    [    1.198036] Call Trace:
    [    1.198052]  [00000000004f2534] create_proc_entry+0x7c/0x98
    [    1.198092]  [00000000005719e4] pci_proc_attach_device+0xa4/0xd4
    [    1.198126]  [00000000007d991c] pci_proc_init+0x64/0x88
    [    1.198158]  [00000000007c62a4] kernel_init+0x190/0x330
    [    1.198183]  [0000000000426cf8] kernel_thread+0x38/0x48
    [    1.198210]  [00000000006a0d90] rest_init+0x18/0x5c
    
    Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

diff --git a/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c b/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c
index dbf2fc2..112b09f 100644
--- a/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c
+++ b/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c
@@ -350,8 +350,7 @@ static void pci_parse_of_addrs(struct of_device *op,
 
 struct pci_dev *of_create_pci_dev(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
 				  struct device_node *node,
-				  struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn,
-				  int host_controller)
+				  struct pci_bus *bus, int devfn)
 {
 	struct dev_archdata *sd;
 	struct pci_dev *dev;
@@ -390,43 +389,28 @@ struct pci_dev *of_create_pci_dev(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
 	dev->devfn = devfn;
 	dev->multifunction = 0;		/* maybe a lie? */
 
-	if (host_controller) {
-		if (tlb_type != hypervisor) {
-			pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_VENDOR_ID,
-					     &dev->vendor);
-			pci_read_config_word(dev, PCI_DEVICE_ID,
-					     &dev->device);
-		} else {
-			dev->vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_SUN;
-			dev->device = 0x80f0;
-		}
-		dev->cfg_size = 256;
-		dev->class = PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST << 8;
-		sprintf(pci_name(dev), "%04x:%02x:%02x.%d", pci_domain_nr(bus),
-			0x00, PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn));
-	} else {
-		dev->vendor = of_getintprop_default(node, "vendor-id", 0xffff);
-		dev->device = of_getintprop_default(node, "device-id", 0xffff);
-		dev->subsystem_vendor =
-			of_getintprop_default(node, "subsystem-vendor-id", 0);
-		dev->subsystem_device =
-			of_getintprop_default(node, "subsystem-id", 0);
-
-		dev->cfg_size = pci_cfg_space_size(dev);
-
-		/* We can't actually use the firmware value, we have
-		 * to read what is in the register right now.  One
-		 * reason is that in the case of IDE interfaces the
-		 * firmware can sample the value before the the IDE
-		 * interface is programmed into native mode.
-		 */
-		pci_read_config_dword(dev, PCI_CLASS_REVISION, &class);
-		dev->class = class >> 8;
-		dev->revision = class & 0xff;
+	dev->vendor = of_getintprop_default(node, "vendor-id", 0xffff);
+	dev->device = of_getintprop_default(node, "device-id", 0xffff);
+	dev->subsystem_vendor =
+		of_getintprop_default(node, "subsystem-vendor-id", 0);
+	dev->subsystem_device =
+		of_getintprop_default(node, "subsystem-id", 0);
+
+	dev->cfg_size = pci_cfg_space_size(dev);
+
+	/* We can't actually use the firmware value, we have
+	 * to read what is in the register right now.  One
+	 * reason is that in the case of IDE interfaces the
+	 * firmware can sample the value before the the IDE
+	 * interface is programmed into native mode.
+	 */
+	pci_read_config_dword(dev, PCI_CLASS_REVISION, &class);
+	dev->class = class >> 8;
+	dev->revision = class & 0xff;
+
+	sprintf(pci_name(dev), "%04x:%02x:%02x.%d", pci_domain_nr(bus),
+		dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn));
 
-		sprintf(pci_name(dev), "%04x:%02x:%02x.%d", pci_domain_nr(bus),
-			dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn));
-	}
 	if (ofpci_verbose)
 		printk("    class: 0x%x device name: %s\n",
 		       dev->class, pci_name(dev));
@@ -441,26 +425,21 @@ struct pci_dev *of_create_pci_dev(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
 	dev->current_state = 4;		/* unknown power state */
 	dev->error_state = pci_channel_io_normal;
 
-	if (host_controller) {
+	if (!strcmp(type, "pci") || !strcmp(type, "pciex")) {
+		/* a PCI-PCI bridge */
 		dev->hdr_type = PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE;
 		dev->rom_base_reg = PCI_ROM_ADDRESS1;
-		dev->irq = PCI_IRQ_NONE;
+	} else if (!strcmp(type, "cardbus")) {
+		dev->hdr_type = PCI_HEADER_TYPE_CARDBUS;
 	} else {
-		if (!strcmp(type, "pci") || !strcmp(type, "pciex")) {
-			/* a PCI-PCI bridge */
-			dev->hdr_type = PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE;
-			dev->rom_base_reg = PCI_ROM_ADDRESS1;
-		} else if (!strcmp(type, "cardbus")) {
-			dev->hdr_type = PCI_HEADER_TYPE_CARDBUS;
-		} else {
-			dev->hdr_type = PCI_HEADER_TYPE_NORMAL;
-			dev->rom_base_reg = PCI_ROM_ADDRESS;
+		dev->hdr_type = PCI_HEADER_TYPE_NORMAL;
+		dev->rom_base_reg = PCI_ROM_ADDRESS;
 
-			dev->irq = sd->op->irqs[0];
-			if (dev->irq == 0xffffffff)
-				dev->irq = PCI_IRQ_NONE;
-		}
+		dev->irq = sd->op->irqs[0];
+		if (dev->irq == 0xffffffff)
+			dev->irq = PCI_IRQ_NONE;
 	}
+
 	pci_parse_of_addrs(sd->op, node, dev);
 
 	if (ofpci_verbose)
@@ -749,7 +728,7 @@ static void __devinit pci_of_scan_bus(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
 		prev_devfn = devfn;
 
 		/* create a new pci_dev for this device */
-		dev = of_create_pci_dev(pbm, child, bus, devfn, 0);
+		dev = of_create_pci_dev(pbm, child, bus, devfn);
 		if (!dev)
 			continue;
 		if (ofpci_verbose)
@@ -796,48 +775,9 @@ static void __devinit pci_bus_register_of_sysfs(struct pci_bus *bus)
 		pci_bus_register_of_sysfs(child_bus);
 }
 
-int pci_host_bridge_read_pci_cfg(struct pci_bus *bus_dev,
-				 unsigned int devfn,
-				 int where, int size,
-				 u32 *value)
-{
-	static u8 fake_pci_config[] = {
-		0x8e, 0x10, /* Vendor: 0x108e (Sun) */
-		0xf0, 0x80, /* Device: 0x80f0 (Fire) */
-		0x46, 0x01, /* Command: 0x0146 (SERR, PARITY, MASTER, MEM) */
-		0xa0, 0x22, /* Status: 0x02a0 (DEVSEL_MED, FB2B, 66MHZ) */
-		0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x06, /* Class: 0x06000000 host bridge */
-		0x00, /* Cacheline: 0x00 */
-		0x40, /* Latency: 0x40 */
-		0x00, /* Header-Type: 0x00 normal */
-	};
-
-	*value = 0;
-	if (where >= 0 && where < sizeof(fake_pci_config) &&
-	    (where + size) >= 0 &&
-	    (where + size) < sizeof(fake_pci_config) &&
-	    size <= sizeof(u32)) {
-		while (size--) {
-			*value <<= 8;
-			*value |= fake_pci_config[where + size];
-		}
-	}
-
-	return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
-}
-
-int pci_host_bridge_write_pci_cfg(struct pci_bus *bus_dev,
-				  unsigned int devfn,
-				  int where, int size,
-				  u32 value)
-{
-	return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
-}
-
 struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_scan_one_pbm(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm)
 {
 	struct device_node *node = pbm->prom_node;
-	struct pci_dev *host_pdev;
 	struct pci_bus *bus;
 
 	printk("PCI: Scanning PBM %s\n", node->full_name);
@@ -855,10 +795,6 @@ struct pci_bus * __devinit pci_scan_one_pbm(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm)
 	bus->resource[0] = &pbm->io_space;
 	bus->resource[1] = &pbm->mem_space;
 
-	/* Create the dummy host bridge and link it in.  */
-	host_pdev = of_create_pci_dev(pbm, node, bus, 0x00, 1);
-	bus->self = host_pdev;
-
 	pci_of_scan_bus(pbm, node, bus);
 	pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
 	pci_bus_register_of_sysfs(bus);
diff --git a/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci_common.c b/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci_common.c
index 923e0bc..19fa621 100644
--- a/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci_common.c
+++ b/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci_common.c
@@ -264,9 +264,6 @@ static int sun4v_read_pci_cfg(struct pci_bus *bus_dev, unsigned int devfn,
 	unsigned int func = PCI_FUNC(devfn);
 	unsigned long ret;
 
-	if (!bus && devfn == 0x00)
-		return pci_host_bridge_read_pci_cfg(bus_dev, devfn, where,
-						    size, value);
 	if (config_out_of_range(pbm, bus, devfn, where)) {
 		ret = ~0UL;
 	} else {
@@ -300,9 +297,6 @@ static int sun4v_write_pci_cfg(struct pci_bus *bus_dev, unsigned int devfn,
 	unsigned int func = PCI_FUNC(devfn);
 	unsigned long ret;
 
-	if (!bus && devfn == 0x00)
-		return pci_host_bridge_write_pci_cfg(bus_dev, devfn, where,
-						     size, value);
 	if (config_out_of_range(pbm, bus, devfn, where)) {
 		/* Do nothing. */
 	} else {
diff --git a/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci_impl.h b/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci_impl.h
index 218bac4..c385d12 100644
--- a/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci_impl.h
+++ b/arch/sparc64/kernel/pci_impl.h
@@ -167,15 +167,6 @@ extern void pci_get_pbm_props(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm);
 extern struct pci_bus *pci_scan_one_pbm(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm);
 extern void pci_determine_mem_io_space(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm);
 
-extern int pci_host_bridge_read_pci_cfg(struct pci_bus *bus_dev,
-					unsigned int devfn,
-					int where, int size,
-					u32 *value);
-extern int pci_host_bridge_write_pci_cfg(struct pci_bus *bus_dev,
-					 unsigned int devfn,
-					 int where, int size,
-					 u32 value);
-
 /* Error reporting support. */
 extern void pci_scan_for_target_abort(struct pci_pbm_info *, struct pci_bus *);
 extern void pci_scan_for_master_abort(struct pci_pbm_info *, struct pci_bus *);

Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[Mikael Pettersson]

David Miller writes:
 > From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
 > Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 09:35:52 +0200
 > 
 > > Fatal server error:
 > > xf86MapPciMem: Could not mmap PCI memory [base=0xe2000000,hostbase=0xe2000000,size 00] (No such file or directory)
 > > 
 > > I'll start digging through 2.6.25->2.6.26-rc1 later today,
 > > meanwhile I've put Xorg.0.log, Xorg strace, dmesg, and .config
 > > files for 2.6.25 (working) and 2.6.26-rc4 (failing) in
 > > <http://user.it.uu.se/~mikpe/linux/sparc64-2.6.26-rcN-xorg-bug/>.
 > 
 > It's likely this change below.  Unfortunately older versions of X
 > seemingly cannot cope with a lack of PCI host controller in the PCI
 > hierarchy exported by the kernel.
 > 
 > That's really a bug in X, current libpciaccess based X servers work
 > fine, and the bug fixed by this changeset is not solvable in any other
 > reasonable way.  So unfortunately older X verions will stay not
 > working.  Sorry.
 > 
 > commit c26d3c0138970778fabe114df99dffb34a04b1d7
 > Author: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
 > Date:   Thu May 1 01:12:40 2008 -0700

Confirmed. Reverting this patch from 2.6.26-rc1 made my Xorg-7.1.1 work again.

It's a shame though that a bug fix needs to have such draconian consequences.

/Mikael

Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[Mikael Pettersson]

David Miller writes:
 > From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
 > Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 09:35:52 +0200
 > 
 > > Fatal server error:
 > > xf86MapPciMem: Could not mmap PCI memory [base=0xe2000000,hostbase=0xe2000000,size=2000] (No such file or directory)
 > > 
 > > I'll start digging through 2.6.25->2.6.26-rc1 later today,
 > > meanwhile I've put Xorg.0.log, Xorg strace, dmesg, and .config
 > > files for 2.6.25 (working) and 2.6.26-rc4 (failing) in
 > > <http://user.it.uu.se/~mikpe/linux/sparc64-2.6.26-rcN-xorg-bug/>.
 > 
 > It's likely this change below.  Unfortunately older versions of X
 > seemingly cannot cope with a lack of PCI host controller in the PCI
 > hierarchy exported by the kernel.
 > 
 > That's really a bug in X, current libpciaccess based X servers work
 > fine, and the bug fixed by this changeset is not solvable in any other
 > reasonable way.  So unfortunately older X verions will stay not
 > working.  Sorry.
 > 
 > commit c26d3c0138970778fabe114df99dffb34a04b1d7
 > Author: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
 > Date:   Thu May 1 01:12:40 2008 -0700

Confirmed. Reverting this patch from 2.6.26-rc1 made my Xorg-7.1.1 work again.

It's a shame though that a bug fix needs to have such draconian consequences.

/Mikael

Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[David Miller]

From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 21:26:35 +0200

> It's a shame though that a bug fix needs to have such draconian consequences.

I agree, but the way the X server (tried to) work on sparc before
libpciaccess was even more draconian.

Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[David Miller]

From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 21:26:35 +0200

> It's a shame though that a bug fix needs to have such draconian consequences.

I agree, but the way the X server (tried to) work on sparc before
libpciaccess was even more draconian.

Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[David Miller]

From: "Raimo Schmidt" <raimoschmidt@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 23:59:49 +0400

> Hello. I've the same problem runnin' X.org 6 using kernel 2.6.25.4 on PC.
> After few seconds of black screen it writes that X.org died

The patch discussed here is sparc64 specific so won't in any way
help your case on a PC, sorry.

Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[David Miller]

From: "Raimo Schmidt" <raimoschmidt@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 23:59:49 +0400

> Hello. I've the same problem runnin' X.org 6 using kernel 2.6.25.4 on PC.
> After few seconds of black screen it writes that X.org died

The patch discussed here is sparc64 specific so won't in any way
help your case on a PC, sorry.

Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[Dave Airlie]

>  >
>  > > Fatal server error:
>  > > xf86MapPciMem: Could not mmap PCI memory [base=0xe2000000,hostbase=0xe2000000,size 00] (No such file or directory)
>  > >
>  > > I'll start digging through 2.6.25->2.6.26-rc1 later today,
>  > > meanwhile I've put Xorg.0.log, Xorg strace, dmesg, and .config
>  > > files for 2.6.25 (working) and 2.6.26-rc4 (failing) in
>  > > <http://user.it.uu.se/~mikpe/linux/sparc64-2.6.26-rcN-xorg-bug/>.
>  >
>  > It's likely this change below.  Unfortunately older versions of X
>  > seemingly cannot cope with a lack of PCI host controller in the PCI
>  > hierarchy exported by the kernel.
>  >
>  > That's really a bug in X, current libpciaccess based X servers work
>  > fine, and the bug fixed by this changeset is not solvable in any other
>  > reasonable way.  So unfortunately older X verions will stay not
>  > working.  Sorry.
>  >
>  > commit c26d3c0138970778fabe114df99dffb34a04b1d7
>  > Author: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
>  > Date:   Thu May 1 01:12:40 2008 -0700
>
> Confirmed. Reverting this patch from 2.6.26-rc1 made my Xorg-7.1.1 work again.
>
> It's a shame though that a bug fix needs to have such draconian consequences.
>

Wow thats a major userspace regression to ship, we'd never get away
with doing that on x86 platforms.

Dave.

Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[Dave Airlie]

>  >
>  > > Fatal server error:
>  > > xf86MapPciMem: Could not mmap PCI memory [base=0xe2000000,hostbase=0xe2000000,size=2000] (No such file or directory)
>  > >
>  > > I'll start digging through 2.6.25->2.6.26-rc1 later today,
>  > > meanwhile I've put Xorg.0.log, Xorg strace, dmesg, and .config
>  > > files for 2.6.25 (working) and 2.6.26-rc4 (failing) in
>  > > <http://user.it.uu.se/~mikpe/linux/sparc64-2.6.26-rcN-xorg-bug/>.
>  >
>  > It's likely this change below.  Unfortunately older versions of X
>  > seemingly cannot cope with a lack of PCI host controller in the PCI
>  > hierarchy exported by the kernel.
>  >
>  > That's really a bug in X, current libpciaccess based X servers work
>  > fine, and the bug fixed by this changeset is not solvable in any other
>  > reasonable way.  So unfortunately older X verions will stay not
>  > working.  Sorry.
>  >
>  > commit c26d3c0138970778fabe114df99dffb34a04b1d7
>  > Author: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
>  > Date:   Thu May 1 01:12:40 2008 -0700
>
> Confirmed. Reverting this patch from 2.6.26-rc1 made my Xorg-7.1.1 work again.
>
> It's a shame though that a bug fix needs to have such draconian consequences.
>

Wow thats a major userspace regression to ship, we'd never get away
with doing that on x86 platforms.

Dave.

Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[David Miller]

From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 06:45:57 +1000

> Wow thats a major userspace regression to ship, we'd never get away
> with doing that on x86 platforms.

x86 has how many maintainers and contributors last time you checked?

Meanwhile X itself shipped mostly-non-working for PCI devices on sparc
for years.  And would you also not argue that it's broken to begin
with that the older X servers cannot work properly without a root PCI
controller being there?

The only way I can work around this issue is to provide a virtual host
bridge driver in the kernel, and I tried to do that, but it doesn't
work which is why the change got installed that did.

We'd need this because on many sparc64 machines the PCI host bridge
(and some sub-bridges) aren't even accessible via PCI config space.

If you provide a virtual host bridge, you have to emulate all of
the PCI config space accesses, you have to provide the expected
linkage and hierarchy with the rest of the PCI devices, and you
also have to do all of the I/O and MEM space range bits correctly
too.

For PCI-E and sub-bridges this becomes even more complicated, and
frankly a waste of time.

In short you have to implement an entire non-trivial emulation layer
for this stuff.

I'm the only sparc64 platform developer, so my time is better spent
moving forward and making sure that libpciaccess based X servers
aren't so broken and do the right thing in a way which works in a
maintainable long term manner.

Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[David Miller]

From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 06:45:57 +1000

> Wow thats a major userspace regression to ship, we'd never get away
> with doing that on x86 platforms.

x86 has how many maintainers and contributors last time you checked?

Meanwhile X itself shipped mostly-non-working for PCI devices on sparc
for years.  And would you also not argue that it's broken to begin
with that the older X servers cannot work properly without a root PCI
controller being there?

The only way I can work around this issue is to provide a virtual host
bridge driver in the kernel, and I tried to do that, but it doesn't
work which is why the change got installed that did.

We'd need this because on many sparc64 machines the PCI host bridge
(and some sub-bridges) aren't even accessible via PCI config space.

If you provide a virtual host bridge, you have to emulate all of
the PCI config space accesses, you have to provide the expected
linkage and hierarchy with the rest of the PCI devices, and you
also have to do all of the I/O and MEM space range bits correctly
too.

For PCI-E and sub-bridges this becomes even more complicated, and
frankly a waste of time.

In short you have to implement an entire non-trivial emulation layer
for this stuff.

I'm the only sparc64 platform developer, so my time is better spent
moving forward and making sure that libpciaccess based X servers
aren't so broken and do the right thing in a way which works in a
maintainable long term manner.

Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[Dennis Gilmore]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 632 bytes --]

On Tuesday 03 June 2008, you wrote:
> From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 21:26:35 +0200
>
> > It's a shame though that a bug fix needs to have such draconian
> > consequences.
>
> I agree, but the way the X server (tried to) work on sparc before
> libpciaccess was even more draconian.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

well i can confirm that X server 1.5 works fine on 2.6.25.4  not that its 
unexpected.

Dennis

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[Dennis Gilmore]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 632 bytes --]

On Tuesday 03 June 2008, you wrote:
> From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2008 21:26:35 +0200
>
> > It's a shame though that a bug fix needs to have such draconian
> > consequences.
>
> I agree, but the way the X server (tried to) work on sparc before
> libpciaccess was even more draconian.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

well i can confirm that X server 1.5 works fine on 2.6.25.4  not that its 
unexpected.

Dennis

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]

Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[Frans Pop]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 838 bytes --]

David Miller wrote:
> Meanwhile X itself shipped mostly-non-working for PCI devices on sparc
> for years.  And would you also not argue that it's broken to begin
> with that the older X servers cannot work properly without a root PCI
> controller being there?

I can relate to that as starting X at one point ate the partition table on 
both my harddrives due to a PCI handling bug :-/
 
I assume this is not an issue with X.Org 7.3 (which is what Debian Lenny 
will probably release with)?

> I'm the only sparc64 platform developer, so my time is better spent
> moving forward and making sure that libpciaccess based X servers
> aren't so broken and do the right thing in a way which works in a
> maintainable long term manner.

From my limited perspective: agreed. And thanks for all the work you do.

Cheers,
FJP

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[Frans Pop]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 838 bytes --]

David Miller wrote:
> Meanwhile X itself shipped mostly-non-working for PCI devices on sparc
> for years.  And would you also not argue that it's broken to begin
> with that the older X servers cannot work properly without a root PCI
> controller being there?

I can relate to that as starting X at one point ate the partition table on 
both my harddrives due to a PCI handling bug :-/
 
I assume this is not an issue with X.Org 7.3 (which is what Debian Lenny 
will probably release with)?

> I'm the only sparc64 platform developer, so my time is better spent
> moving forward and making sure that libpciaccess based X servers
> aren't so broken and do the right thing in a way which works in a
> maintainable long term manner.

From my limited perspective: agreed. And thanks for all the work you do.

Cheers,
FJP

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[David Miller]

From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 02:04:02 +0200

> I assume this is not an issue with X.Org 7.3 (which is what Debian Lenny 
> will probably release with)?

Yes, that should work.

> And thanks for all the work you do.

No problem.

Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[David Miller]

From: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 02:04:02 +0200

> I assume this is not an issue with X.Org 7.3 (which is what Debian Lenny 
> will probably release with)?

Yes, that should work.

> And thanks for all the work you do.

No problem.

Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[Mikael Pettersson]

David Miller writes:
 > From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>
 > Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 06:45:57 +1000
 > 
 > > Wow thats a major userspace regression to ship, we'd never get away
 > > with doing that on x86 platforms.
 > 
 > x86 has how many maintainers and contributors last time you checked?
 > 
 > Meanwhile X itself shipped mostly-non-working for PCI devices on sparc
 > for years.  And would you also not argue that it's broken to begin
 > with that the older X servers cannot work properly without a root PCI
 > controller being there?
 > 
 > The only way I can work around this issue is to provide a virtual host
 > bridge driver in the kernel, and I tried to do that, but it doesn't
 > work which is why the change got installed that did.
 > 
 > We'd need this because on many sparc64 machines the PCI host bridge
 > (and some sub-bridges) aren't even accessible via PCI config space.
 > 
 > If you provide a virtual host bridge, you have to emulate all of
 > the PCI config space accesses, you have to provide the expected
 > linkage and hierarchy with the rest of the PCI devices, and you
 > also have to do all of the I/O and MEM space range bits correctly
 > too.
 > 
 > For PCI-E and sub-bridges this becomes even more complicated, and
 > frankly a waste of time.
 > 
 > In short you have to implement an entire non-trivial emulation layer
 > for this stuff.
 > 
 > I'm the only sparc64 platform developer, so my time is better spent
 > moving forward and making sure that libpciaccess based X servers
 > aren't so broken and do the right thing in a way which works in a
 > maintainable long term manner.

Indeed. You need to prioritize, and FWIW I support your decision.

/Mikael

Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[Mikael Pettersson]

David Miller writes:
 > From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>
 > Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 06:45:57 +1000
 > 
 > > Wow thats a major userspace regression to ship, we'd never get away
 > > with doing that on x86 platforms.
 > 
 > x86 has how many maintainers and contributors last time you checked?
 > 
 > Meanwhile X itself shipped mostly-non-working for PCI devices on sparc
 > for years.  And would you also not argue that it's broken to begin
 > with that the older X servers cannot work properly without a root PCI
 > controller being there?
 > 
 > The only way I can work around this issue is to provide a virtual host
 > bridge driver in the kernel, and I tried to do that, but it doesn't
 > work which is why the change got installed that did.
 > 
 > We'd need this because on many sparc64 machines the PCI host bridge
 > (and some sub-bridges) aren't even accessible via PCI config space.
 > 
 > If you provide a virtual host bridge, you have to emulate all of
 > the PCI config space accesses, you have to provide the expected
 > linkage and hierarchy with the rest of the PCI devices, and you
 > also have to do all of the I/O and MEM space range bits correctly
 > too.
 > 
 > For PCI-E and sub-bridges this becomes even more complicated, and
 > frankly a waste of time.
 > 
 > In short you have to implement an entire non-trivial emulation layer
 > for this stuff.
 > 
 > I'm the only sparc64 platform developer, so my time is better spent
 > moving forward and making sure that libpciaccess based X servers
 > aren't so broken and do the right thing in a way which works in a
 > maintainable long term manner.

Indeed. You need to prioritize, and FWIW I support your decision.

/Mikael

Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[Daniel Smolik]

Mikael Pettersson napsal(a):
> David Miller writes:
>  > From: "Dave Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>
>  > Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2008 06:45:57 +1000
>  > 
>  > > Wow thats a major userspace regression to ship, we'd never get away
>  > > with doing that on x86 platforms.
>  > 
>  > x86 has how many maintainers and contributors last time you checked?
>  > 
>  > Meanwhile X itself shipped mostly-non-working for PCI devices on sparc
>  > for years.  And would you also not argue that it's broken to begin
>  > with that the older X servers cannot work properly without a root PCI
>  > controller being there?
>  > 
>  > The only way I can work around this issue is to provide a virtual host
>  > bridge driver in the kernel, and I tried to do that, but it doesn't
>  > work which is why the change got installed that did.
>  > 
>  > We'd need this because on many sparc64 machines the PCI host bridge
>  > (and some sub-bridges) aren't even accessible via PCI config space.
>  > 
>  > If you provide a virtual host bridge, you have to emulate all of
>  > the PCI config space accesses, you have to provide the expected
>  > linkage and hierarchy with the rest of the PCI devices, and you
>  > also have to do all of the I/O and MEM space range bits correctly
>  > too.
>  > 
>  > For PCI-E and sub-bridges this becomes even more complicated, and
>  > frankly a waste of time.
>  > 
>  > In short you have to implement an entire non-trivial emulation layer
>  > for this stuff.
>  > 
>  > I'm the only sparc64 platform developer, so my time is better spent
>  > moving forward and making sure that libpciaccess based X servers
>  > aren't so broken and do the right thing in a way which works in a
>  > maintainable long term manner.
> 
> Indeed. You need to prioritize, and FWIW I support your decision.
> 
Have anybody now working X on some multidomain PCI machine like E250 or 
E450 ? I have upgraded to 2.6.26 and latest SID and now is my Permedia2 
card detected but X crashes with :


(++) Using config file: "/root/xorg.conf.new"
(WW) ****INVALID MEM ALLOCATION**** b: 0x20000 e: 0x3ffff correcting
(WW) ****INVALID MEM ALLOCATION**** b: 0x800000 e: 0xffffff correcting
(WW) ****INVALID MEM ALLOCATION**** b: 0x1000000 e: 0x17fffff correcting
mmap failure: Invalid argument

Fatal server error:
xf86MapDomainMem():  mmap() failure

This is much better then before but still not perfect :-(

	Dan

Re: [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1 broke X on SPARC Ultra5

[Friedrich Oslage]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 824 bytes --]

Debian SID uses xorg-server 1.4.2 but to get a working you need 1.5(aka
1.4.99.*).

Cheers,
Friedrich

Am Montag, den 28.07.2008, 18:15 +0200 schrieb Daniel Smolik:
> Have anybody now working X on some multidomain PCI machine like E250 or 
> E450 ? I have upgraded to 2.6.26 and latest SID and now is my Permedia2 
> card detected but X crashes with :
> 
> 
> (++) Using config file: "/root/xorg.conf.new"
> (WW) ****INVALID MEM ALLOCATION**** b: 0x20000 e: 0x3ffff correcting
> (WW) ****INVALID MEM ALLOCATION**** b: 0x800000 e: 0xffffff correcting
> (WW) ****INVALID MEM ALLOCATION**** b: 0x1000000 e: 0x17fffff correcting
> mmap failure: Invalid argument
> 
> Fatal server error:
> xf86MapDomainMem():  mmap() failure
> 
> This is much better then before but still not perfect :-(
> 
> 	Dan
> 


[-- Attachment #2: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]