From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Cc: "Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"David Müller" <dave.mueller@gmx.ch>,
jgarzik@pobox.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata: fix out-of-bounds access in pata_oldpiix.c
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 13:35:06 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4892927A.1000808@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200807181615.26272.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Friday 18 July 2008, Alan Cox wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 09:06:12 +0200
>> David Müller <dave.mueller@gmx.ch> wrote:
>>
>>> The "pata_oldpiix" driver in linux-2.6.26 is calling its "set_dmamode"
>>> routine also locally, but under different preconditions as the
>>> corresponding call in libata-core.c. This may cause an "out-of-array
>>> bounds" access in "oldpiix_set_dmamode".
>> This looks wrong adev->dma_mode should never be invalid at this point.
>> Are you not confusing dma_mask and dma_mode. Can you provide the
>> backtraces of the failing case and the actual chip variant you are using ?
>>
>> Either way the fix is not in oldpiix if this is appearing as 0xFF but in
>> the core code so NAK
>
> ->dma_mode == 0xff means that DMA is unsupported by a given device
> and according to the core code it is a valid ->dma_mode setting.
>
> This may want to be changed in the future but as the things are right
> now David's patch is correct and fixes a real bug. Please UNNAK.
Alan, David's patch is correct. 0xff indicates unsupported transfer
mode (mainly because 0x00 is valid PIO mode). ->set_pio/dmamode won't
see it as libata-core won't call them if unsupported but qc_issue will
see it. Can you please unnak?
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-01 4:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-18 7:06 [PATCH] libata: fix out-of-bounds access in pata_oldpiix.c David Müller
2008-07-18 8:55 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-18 14:15 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-08-01 4:35 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2008-08-01 22:29 ` Alan Cox
2008-08-03 5:22 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4892927A.1000808@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.mueller@gmx.ch \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.