* does an initcall level of "0s" actually exist?
@ 2008-08-05 22:51 Robert P. J. Day
2008-08-06 22:13 ` Rene Herman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2008-08-05 22:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
from include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h:
#define INITCALLS \
*(.initcallearly.init) \
VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__early_initcall_end) = .; \
*(.initcall0.init) \
*(.initcall0s.init) \
*(.initcall1.init) \
*(.initcall1s.init) \
... etc ...
but from include/linux/init.h:
#define pure_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("0",fn,0)
#define core_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("1",fn,1)
#define core_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("1s",fn,1s)
#define postcore_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("2",fn,2)
#define postcore_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("2s",fn,2s)
i don't see any initcalls of level "0s". in any event, might it not
be cleaner to have these files sync up? no big deal, of course. i'm
well aware that it doesn't break anything.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
Have classroom, will lecture.
http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: does an initcall level of "0s" actually exist?
2008-08-05 22:51 does an initcall level of "0s" actually exist? Robert P. J. Day
@ 2008-08-06 22:13 ` Rene Herman
2008-08-06 22:18 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rene Herman @ 2008-08-06 22:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert P. J. Day; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Arjan van de Ven
On 06-08-08 00:51, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> from include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h:
>
> #define INITCALLS \
> *(.initcallearly.init) \
> VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__early_initcall_end) = .; \
> *(.initcall0.init) \
> *(.initcall0s.init) \
> *(.initcall1.init) \
> *(.initcall1s.init) \
> ... etc ...
>
> but from include/linux/init.h:
>
> #define pure_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("0",fn,0)
>
> #define core_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("1",fn,1)
> #define core_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("1s",fn,1s)
> #define postcore_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("2",fn,2)
> #define postcore_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("2s",fn,2s)
>
> i don't see any initcalls of level "0s". in any event, might it not
> be cleaner to have these files sync up? no big deal, of course. i'm
> well aware that it doesn't break anything.
Last I heard, all sync levels were on their way out (Arjan).
Rene.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: does an initcall level of "0s" actually exist?
2008-08-06 22:13 ` Rene Herman
@ 2008-08-06 22:18 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2008-08-06 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rene Herman; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Arjan van de Ven
On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Rene Herman wrote:
> On 06-08-08 00:51, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > from include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h:
> >
> > #define INITCALLS \
> > *(.initcallearly.init) \
> > VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__early_initcall_end) = .; \
> > *(.initcall0.init) \
> > *(.initcall0s.init) \
> > *(.initcall1.init) \
> > *(.initcall1s.init) \
> > ... etc ...
> >
> > but from include/linux/init.h:
> >
> > #define pure_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("0",fn,0)
> >
> > #define core_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("1",fn,1)
> > #define core_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("1s",fn,1s)
> > #define postcore_initcall(fn) __define_initcall("2",fn,2)
> > #define postcore_initcall_sync(fn) __define_initcall("2s",fn,2s)
> >
> > i don't see any initcalls of level "0s". in any event, might it not
> > be cleaner to have these files sync up? no big deal, of course. i'm
> > well aware that it doesn't break anything.
>
> Last I heard, all sync levels were on their way out (Arjan).
ah, i was unaware of that, thanks.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
Have classroom, will lecture.
http://crashcourse.ca Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-08-06 22:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-08-05 22:51 does an initcall level of "0s" actually exist? Robert P. J. Day
2008-08-06 22:13 ` Rene Herman
2008-08-06 22:18 ` Robert P. J. Day
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.