* [lm-sensors] Getting an alarm even with values between min/max
@ 2008-08-07 7:14 Marc Muehlfeld
2008-08-07 7:31 ` Hans de Goede
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marc Muehlfeld @ 2008-08-07 7:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Hello.
I run lm_sensors 2.6.5 on a Redhat 7.2 machine (it's a server for a legacy
application).
Nothing changed on the OS for ~3 years and I'm unsure, why I get an alarm
since a few days on VCore1/VCore2 even the values are in the range:
w83627hf-i2c-0-2c
Adapter: SMBus AMD75x adapter at 80e0
Algorithm: Non-I2C SMBus adapter
#2 VCore1: +1.55 V (min = +1.44 V, max = +1.76 V) ALARM
#2 VCore2: +1.60 V (min = +1.52 V, max = +1.68 V) ALARM
What causes this?
Regards
Marc Muehlfeld
--
Marc Muehlfeld (Leitung IT)
Zentrum fuer Humangenetik und Laboratoriumsmedizin Dr. Klein und Dr. Rost
Lochhamer Str. 29 - D-82152 Martinsried
Telefon: +49(0)89/895578-0 - Fax: +49(0)89/895578-78
http://www.medizinische-genetik.de
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [lm-sensors] Getting an alarm even with values between min/max
2008-08-07 7:14 [lm-sensors] Getting an alarm even with values between min/max Marc Muehlfeld
@ 2008-08-07 7:31 ` Hans de Goede
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hans de Goede @ 2008-08-07 7:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: lm-sensors
Marc Muehlfeld wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I run lm_sensors 2.6.5 on a Redhat 7.2 machine (it's a server for a legacy
> application).
>
> Nothing changed on the OS for ~3 years and I'm unsure, why I get an alarm
> since a few days on VCore1/VCore2 even the values are in the range:
>
> w83627hf-i2c-0-2c
> Adapter: SMBus AMD75x adapter at 80e0
> Algorithm: Non-I2C SMBus adapter
> #2 VCore1: +1.55 V (min = +1.44 V, max = +1.76 V) ALARM
> #2 VCore2: +1.60 V (min = +1.52 V, max = +1.68 V) ALARM
>
> What causes this?
>
Given that this setup has worked without alarms before, chances are pretty big
that those ALARMS are real, IOW the powersupply on your motherboard for the CPU
is starting to fail (bad elco's ?). An ALARM gets set when the voltage gets
outside the allowable window and then *stays set* even if the voltage returns
to normal. It gets cleared the first time you read it.
So I think the following is happening:
1) voltage briefly goes outside window, the w83627hf sets its alarm flag
2) you run sensors, voltage has returned to normal but the ALARM flag that was
set gets reported now (and normally also cleared)
You could try running sensors in quick succession, if this is an intermediate
failure, the ALARM should not be present on the second run. (But their might be
some bug causing it to stay set, thats some pretty old software you're running
there).
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-08-07 7:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-08-07 7:14 [lm-sensors] Getting an alarm even with values between min/max Marc Muehlfeld
2008-08-07 7:31 ` Hans de Goede
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.