* Tested reiser4 and got some problems.
@ 2008-08-07 13:28 Anders Aagaard
2008-08-07 13:42 ` Dushan Tcholich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anders Aagaard @ 2008-08-07 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: reiserfs-devel
Hi
I just tested reiser4, and ran into some problems right away, with
reiser4progs 1.0.6 and patches from
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/edward/reiser4/reiser4-for-2.6/.
Patched on top of gentoo-sources 2.6.25.
After executing this on my test box:
mkfs.reiser4 -o create=ccreg40,compress=lzo1 /dev/sdb2
mount -t reiser4 -o noatime /dev/sdb2 /mnt/sdb
cd /mnt/sdb
rsync -vax --exclude "/dev/" --exclude "/proc/" --exclude "/sys"
--exclude "/mnt" --progress / .
mkdir -p dev sys proc mnt mnt/cdrom
mknod dev/console c 5 1
mknod dev/null c 1 3
cd ..
umount /mnt/sdb
fsck.reiser4 /dev/sdb2
fsck finds TONS of errors like this:
FSCK: obj40_repair.c: 223: obj40_stat_unix_check: Node (718264), item
(6),
[67e01:2e524541444d45:67f16] (stat40): wrong bytes (65536), Should be
(310).
FSCK: obj40_repair.c: 223: obj40_stat_unix_check: Node (718264), item
(8),
[67e01:2e73657475702e:67f18] (stat40): wrong bytes (65536), Should be
(152).
FSCK: obj40_repair.c: 223: obj40_stat_unix_check: Node (718264), item
(9),
[67e01:2e73657475702e:67f19] (stat40): wrong bytes (65536), Should be
(416).
FSCK: obj40_repair.c: 223: obj40_stat_unix_check: Node (718264), item
(7),
[67e01:2e6d697373696e:67f17] (stat40): wrong bytes (65536), Should be
(1635).
FSCK: obj40_repair.c: 223: obj40_stat_unix_check: Node (718103), item
(2),
[67dcc:2e74627a32746f:67f0f] (stat40): wrong bytes (65536), Should be
(2223).
Found 360227 objects (some could be encountered more then
once).
Time interval: Thu Aug 7 14:01:13 2008 - Thu Aug 7 14:03:40 2008
After completing the fsck things seem fine, but it makes me slightly
worried. There's no kernel oops'es or anything like that in dmesg,
everything seemed perfectly fine until I did an fsck. Note that this is
repeatable.
Anders
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Tested reiser4 and got some problems.
2008-08-07 13:28 Tested reiser4 and got some problems Anders Aagaard
@ 2008-08-07 13:42 ` Dushan Tcholich
2008-08-07 14:14 ` Anders Aagaard
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dushan Tcholich @ 2008-08-07 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anders Aagaard; +Cc: reiserfs-devel
Hi
Those are false positives when checking cryptocompress partitions,
because they are checked with checksumm so exact file size is not
required for check, and because that filesize is not being updated for
performance reasons.
This should be repaired in next version of reiser4.progs
Here's some more info:
"Dushan Tcholich wrote:
> Would it be possible if there would be a new version of fsck.reiser4
> to fix those false positives about wrong size when checking
> cryptocompress partitions?
>
Yes, per-file warnings about wrong i_bytes should be suppressed.
Fsck just should report at the end of work in default mode, that N wrong
i_bytes were detected and suggest to fix it with --fix option."
http://marc.info/?l=reiserfs-devel&m=121786117117164&w=2
I hope this helps
Dushan
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Anders Aagaard <aagaande@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I just tested reiser4, and ran into some problems right away, with
> reiser4progs 1.0.6 and patches from
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/edward/reiser4/reiser4-for-2.6/.
> Patched on top of gentoo-sources 2.6.25.
>
> After executing this on my test box:
> mkfs.reiser4 -o create=ccreg40,compress=lzo1 /dev/sdb2
> mount -t reiser4 -o noatime /dev/sdb2 /mnt/sdb
> cd /mnt/sdb
> rsync -vax --exclude "/dev/" --exclude "/proc/" --exclude "/sys" --exclude
> "/mnt" --progress / .
> mkdir -p dev sys proc mnt mnt/cdrom
> mknod dev/console c 5 1
> mknod dev/null c 1 3
> cd ..
> umount /mnt/sdb
> fsck.reiser4 /dev/sdb2
>
> fsck finds TONS of errors like this:
> FSCK: obj40_repair.c: 223: obj40_stat_unix_check: Node (718264), item (6),
> [67e01:2e524541444d45:67f16] (stat40): wrong bytes (65536), Should be (310).
> FSCK: obj40_repair.c: 223: obj40_stat_unix_check: Node (718264), item (8),
> [67e01:2e73657475702e:67f18] (stat40): wrong bytes (65536), Should be (152).
> FSCK: obj40_repair.c: 223: obj40_stat_unix_check: Node (718264), item (9),
> [67e01:2e73657475702e:67f19] (stat40): wrong bytes (65536), Should be (416).
> FSCK: obj40_repair.c: 223: obj40_stat_unix_check: Node (718264), item (7),
> [67e01:2e6d697373696e:67f17] (stat40): wrong bytes (65536), Should be
> (1635).
> FSCK: obj40_repair.c: 223: obj40_stat_unix_check: Node (718103), item (2),
> [67dcc:2e74627a32746f:67f0f] (stat40): wrong bytes (65536), Should be
> (2223).
> Found 360227 objects (some could be encountered more then once).
> Time interval: Thu Aug 7 14:01:13 2008 - Thu Aug 7 14:03:40 2008
>
> After completing the fsck things seem fine, but it makes me slightly
> worried. There's no kernel oops'es or anything like that in dmesg,
> everything seemed perfectly fine until I did an fsck. Note that this is
> repeatable.
>
> Anders
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Tested reiser4 and got some problems.
2008-08-07 13:42 ` Dushan Tcholich
@ 2008-08-07 14:14 ` Anders Aagaard
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anders Aagaard @ 2008-08-07 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dushan Tcholich; +Cc: reiserfs-devel
Dushan Tcholich wrote:
> Hi
>
> Those are false positives when checking cryptocompress partitions,
> because they are checked with checksumm so exact file size is not
> required for check, and because that filesize is not being updated for
> performance reasons.
> This should be repaired in next version of reiser4.progs
Ah very nice, it had me worried, I'll keep going until I find a real bug
then ;)
>
> Here's some more info:
> "Dushan Tcholich wrote:
>> Would it be possible if there would be a new version of fsck.reiser4
>> to fix those false positives about wrong size when checking
>> cryptocompress partitions?
>>
>
> Yes, per-file warnings about wrong i_bytes should be suppressed.
> Fsck just should report at the end of work in default mode, that N wrong
> i_bytes were detected and suggest to fix it with --fix option."
> http://marc.info/?l=reiserfs-devel&m=121786117117164&w=2
>
> I hope this helps
> Dushan
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 3:28 PM, Anders Aagaard <aagaande@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I just tested reiser4, and ran into some problems right away, with
>> reiser4progs 1.0.6 and patches from
>> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/edward/reiser4/reiser4-for-2.6/.
>> Patched on top of gentoo-sources 2.6.25.
>>
>> After executing this on my test box:
>> mkfs.reiser4 -o create=ccreg40,compress=lzo1 /dev/sdb2
>> mount -t reiser4 -o noatime /dev/sdb2 /mnt/sdb
>> cd /mnt/sdb
>> rsync -vax --exclude "/dev/" --exclude "/proc/" --exclude "/sys" --exclude
>> "/mnt" --progress / .
>> mkdir -p dev sys proc mnt mnt/cdrom
>> mknod dev/console c 5 1
>> mknod dev/null c 1 3
>> cd ..
>> umount /mnt/sdb
>> fsck.reiser4 /dev/sdb2
>>
>> fsck finds TONS of errors like this:
>> FSCK: obj40_repair.c: 223: obj40_stat_unix_check: Node (718264), item (6),
>> [67e01:2e524541444d45:67f16] (stat40): wrong bytes (65536), Should be (310).
>> FSCK: obj40_repair.c: 223: obj40_stat_unix_check: Node (718264), item (8),
>> [67e01:2e73657475702e:67f18] (stat40): wrong bytes (65536), Should be (152).
>> FSCK: obj40_repair.c: 223: obj40_stat_unix_check: Node (718264), item (9),
>> [67e01:2e73657475702e:67f19] (stat40): wrong bytes (65536), Should be (416).
>> FSCK: obj40_repair.c: 223: obj40_stat_unix_check: Node (718264), item (7),
>> [67e01:2e6d697373696e:67f17] (stat40): wrong bytes (65536), Should be
>> (1635).
>> FSCK: obj40_repair.c: 223: obj40_stat_unix_check: Node (718103), item (2),
>> [67dcc:2e74627a32746f:67f0f] (stat40): wrong bytes (65536), Should be
>> (2223).
>> Found 360227 objects (some could be encountered more then once).
>> Time interval: Thu Aug 7 14:01:13 2008 - Thu Aug 7 14:03:40 2008
>>
>> After completing the fsck things seem fine, but it makes me slightly
>> worried. There's no kernel oops'es or anything like that in dmesg,
>> everything seemed perfectly fine until I did an fsck. Note that this is
>> repeatable.
>>
>> Anders
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe reiserfs-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-08-07 14:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-08-07 13:28 Tested reiser4 and got some problems Anders Aagaard
2008-08-07 13:42 ` Dushan Tcholich
2008-08-07 14:14 ` Anders Aagaard
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.