From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@kernel.org>
Cc: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>,
Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>,
"torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]Fix broken VMI in 2.6.27-rc..
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:10:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <489BE351.5030206@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <489B8FAD.4090904@kernel.org>
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>>
>>> The Linux kernel was never a paragon of perfection - it was never
>>> meant to be. Just because a bit of cruft went unnoticed into the
>>> kernel doesn't mean we shouldn't fix it.
>>
>> I don't really see what the issue is.
>>
>> Fixmaps are primarily used for things that need to be mapped early
>> before we can allocate address space dynamically. They're
>> predominantly used for boot-time init, and rarely on any
>> performance-critical path. The only vaguely regular use a fixmap
>> gets during runtime is poking at apics, and that's dominated by IO
>> time, and kmap_atomic. Statically, there's only 100 references in
>> the kernel. And it only affects 32-bit.
>>
>> Having fixmaps at link-time fixed addresses would be nice, I suppose,
>> but hardly worth going to vast effort over.
>>
>
> No, but it's hardly vast effort, either.
Thinking about it, the fixmap really has to be as high as possible. If
it were any lower, then it would either truncate the 1:1 mapping, or
shadow some physical memory.
J
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-08 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-07 19:12 [PATCH]Fix broken VMI in 2.6.27-rc Alok Kataria
2008-08-07 21:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-07 21:27 ` Zachary Amsden
2008-08-07 21:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-07 21:42 ` Zachary Amsden
2008-08-07 21:52 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-07 21:55 ` Zachary Amsden
2008-08-07 22:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-07 22:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-07 22:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-07 23:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-08-07 23:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-07 23:26 ` Zachary Amsden
2008-08-07 23:49 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-07 23:23 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-08 19:15 ` Alok Kataria
2008-08-08 22:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-07 23:21 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-07 23:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-07 23:46 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-07 23:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-08 0:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2008-08-08 0:11 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-08 0:10 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-08 0:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-08 0:23 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-08-08 0:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-08 6:10 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-08-08 16:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-08 1:14 ` Zachary Amsden
2008-08-08 1:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-08-08 1:28 ` Zachary Amsden
2008-08-07 21:41 ` Alok Kataria
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=489BE351.5030206@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=akataria@vmware.com \
--cc=hpa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zach@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.