From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Phil Oester <kernel@linuxace.com>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Pkttype match mismatches in OUTPUT chain
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:32:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48A2E268.6010808@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080810225353.GA31138@linuxace.com>
Phil Oester wrote:
> Minor change to fix compile warning.
>
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 03:18:35PM -0700, Phil Oester wrote:
>> Back in 7/2006, we fixed an issue with the pkttype match mismatching
>> on locally generated packets.[1] At the time, I didn't test the fix
>> in the OUTPUT chain, but only in the INPUT chain, where packets showed
>> up as PACKET_LOOPBACK. Unfortunately, when packets are output, they
>> aren't tagged as PACKET_LOOPBACK so the fix was incomplete.
>>
>> Below is another attempt at fixing the problem in all cases, and fixes
>> the original netfilter bugzilla #484 as well as a new bug submission (which
>> I can't get the number of since bugzilla is presently down).
>>
>> The fix is somewhat complicated because when broadcast packets hit the
>> OUTPUT chain they have no destination MAC attached, so the "simple"
>> test for 'all FF' doesn't work for us, and instead we have to consult the
>> routing table.
>>
>> One other note: since IPv6 doesn't have the concept of "broadcast", perhaps
>> the userspace extension shouldn't allow broadcast rules to be added for
>> that family?
>>
>> Phil
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Phil Oester <kernel@linuxace.com>
This is getting more and more kludgy, wouldn't it make more sense
to move the pkt_type initialisation from the device layer to the
protocol layer?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-13 13:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-10 22:18 [PATCH] Pkttype match mismatches in OUTPUT chain Phil Oester
2008-08-10 22:53 ` Phil Oester
2008-08-13 13:32 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2008-08-14 12:02 ` Phil Oester
2008-09-03 16:06 ` Phil Oester
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48A2E268.6010808@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kernel@linuxace.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.