Re: [PATCH 0/8] Various USB fixes and improvements (update 2)

[Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>]

Max Krasnyansky wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> Any objections to applying this series?  It seems like the consensus 
>> is that OHCI support is better long term but this series seems pretty 
>> sane and self-contained.
>
> I'm actually having seconds thought on the OHCI vs UHCI. You probably 
> saw my reply to Paul. New UHCI code is fairly clean and simple, and is 
> working well. But I definitely think that we should fix OHCI too, and 
> at some point we need to add EHCI (ie USB 2.0 stuff).
>
> I have more patches coming. I made isoc transactions work on Friday 
> which made MS VX-3000 USB camera totally usable (will send a patch in 
> a couple of hours). And I'm working on making control transactions 
> async too which should shave off last bits of bad latency 
> (2-3milliseconds) from the USB code. Initially I thought control stuff 
> is not very frequent but this stupid USB webcam drivers does one very 
> often.
> So yeah, it be nice if this stuff is merged soonish :).
>
> btw If you're using git as a front end to the SVN I can push my git 
> tree somewhere to kernel.org so that you can just pull the whole thing.

Yes, please do for the future.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori