All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mitch Bradley <wmb@firmworks.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org, scottwood@freescale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3]: Sparc OF I2C support.
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:19:06 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48AE4C4A.8040804@firmworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080821.213747.159824681.davem@davemloft.net>



David Miller wrote:
> From: "Grant Likely" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:34:31 -0600
>
>   
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Grant Likely
>> <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
>>     
>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Mitch Bradley <wmb@firmworks.com> wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Hi, I wrote most of 1275.
>>>>
>>>> Mitch Bradley  (wmb@firmworks.com)
>>>>         
>>> Hi Mitch,
>>>
>>> What is your suggestion.  Where should we be discussing new device
>>> tree bindings?  Whether it be real Open Firmware, or flattened device
>>> tree, or something in between
>>>       
>> ...and along those lines: is there a place for documenting new
>> bindings?  Lacking anything better, those of us in PowerPC-Linux-land
>> have been adding documentation to Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/*
>> in the Linux kernel tree.
>>     
>
> In a discussion I am having with Greg Onufer, David K. and Tayfun
> at Sun, Greg said the some of the newer binding documents are
> being published on the opensolaris site, and he is trying to
> get some of the older cases (like this I2C one) published there
> too.
>
>   

This collection of mailing lists is as good a place as any to discuss 
new bindings.  I don't know how many Sun people are on the lists, but we 
might be able to persuade various Sun people to lurk on one or more of 
them;  I lurk on devicetree-discuss.

The opensolaris site seems as good as anywhere for publishing the 
bindings, especially if they can pull over the old ones from e.g. 
playground.sun.com .

Another possible site might be openbios.org .

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mitch Bradley <wmb@firmworks.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: grant.likely@secretlab.ca, devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	scottwood@freescale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3]: Sparc OF I2C support.
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 05:19:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48AE4C4A.8040804@firmworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080821.213747.159824681.davem@davemloft.net>



David Miller wrote:
> From: "Grant Likely" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:34:31 -0600
>
>   
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Grant Likely
>> <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
>>     
>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Mitch Bradley <wmb@firmworks.com> wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Hi, I wrote most of 1275.
>>>>
>>>> Mitch Bradley  (wmb@firmworks.com)
>>>>         
>>> Hi Mitch,
>>>
>>> What is your suggestion.  Where should we be discussing new device
>>> tree bindings?  Whether it be real Open Firmware, or flattened device
>>> tree, or something in between
>>>       
>> ...and along those lines: is there a place for documenting new
>> bindings?  Lacking anything better, those of us in PowerPC-Linux-land
>> have been adding documentation to Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/*
>> in the Linux kernel tree.
>>     
>
> In a discussion I am having with Greg Onufer, David K. and Tayfun
> at Sun, Greg said the some of the newer binding documents are
> being published on the opensolaris site, and he is trying to
> get some of the older cases (like this I2C one) published there
> too.
>
>   

This collection of mailing lists is as good a place as any to discuss 
new bindings.  I don't know how many Sun people are on the lists, but we 
might be able to persuade various Sun people to lurk on one or more of 
them;  I lurk on devicetree-discuss.

The opensolaris site seems as good as anywhere for publishing the 
bindings, especially if they can pull over the old ones from e.g. 
playground.sun.com .

Another possible site might be openbios.org .


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mitch Bradley <wmb@firmworks.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: grant.likely@secretlab.ca, devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org,
	linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
	scottwood@freescale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3]: Sparc OF I2C support.
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:19:06 -1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48AE4C4A.8040804@firmworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080821.213747.159824681.davem@davemloft.net>



David Miller wrote:
> From: "Grant Likely" <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:34:31 -0600
>
>   
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:30 PM, Grant Likely
>> <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> wrote:
>>     
>>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 10:29 PM, Mitch Bradley <wmb@firmworks.com> wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Hi, I wrote most of 1275.
>>>>
>>>> Mitch Bradley  (wmb@firmworks.com)
>>>>         
>>> Hi Mitch,
>>>
>>> What is your suggestion.  Where should we be discussing new device
>>> tree bindings?  Whether it be real Open Firmware, or flattened device
>>> tree, or something in between
>>>       
>> ...and along those lines: is there a place for documenting new
>> bindings?  Lacking anything better, those of us in PowerPC-Linux-land
>> have been adding documentation to Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/*
>> in the Linux kernel tree.
>>     
>
> In a discussion I am having with Greg Onufer, David K. and Tayfun
> at Sun, Greg said the some of the newer binding documents are
> being published on the opensolaris site, and he is trying to
> get some of the older cases (like this I2C one) published there
> too.
>
>   

This collection of mailing lists is as good a place as any to discuss 
new bindings.  I don't know how many Sun people are on the lists, but we 
might be able to persuade various Sun people to lurk on one or more of 
them;  I lurk on devicetree-discuss.

The opensolaris site seems as good as anywhere for publishing the 
bindings, especially if they can pull over the old ones from e.g. 
playground.sun.com .

Another possible site might be openbios.org .


  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-22  5:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-21  7:10 [PATCH 0/3]: Sparc OF I2C support David Miller
2008-08-21  7:10 ` David Miller
2008-08-21 16:32 ` Scott Wood
2008-08-21 16:32   ` Scott Wood
2008-08-21 21:21   ` David Miller
2008-08-21 21:21     ` David Miller
2008-08-21 21:35     ` Scott Wood
2008-08-21 21:35       ` Scott Wood
2008-08-21 21:45       ` David Miller
2008-08-21 21:45         ` David Miller
2008-08-21 22:05         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-21 22:05           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-21 22:27           ` David Miller
2008-08-21 22:27             ` David Miller
2008-08-21 22:38             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-21 22:38               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-21 22:05       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-21 22:05         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-21 22:28         ` David Miller
2008-08-21 22:28           ` David Miller
2008-08-21 22:39           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-21 22:39             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-21 23:14       ` Grant Likely
2008-08-21 23:14         ` Grant Likely
2008-08-21 23:14         ` Grant Likely
2008-08-21 23:32         ` David Miller
2008-08-21 23:32           ` David Miller
2008-08-21 23:32           ` David Miller
2008-08-22  1:15           ` Josh Boyer
2008-08-22  1:15             ` Josh Boyer
2008-08-22  1:15             ` Josh Boyer
2008-08-22  3:53             ` David Miller
2008-08-22  3:53               ` David Miller
2008-08-22  3:53               ` David Miller
2008-08-22  4:18               ` Grant Likely
2008-08-22  4:18                 ` Grant Likely
2008-08-22  4:18                 ` Grant Likely
2008-08-22  4:22                 ` David Miller
2008-08-22  4:22                   ` David Miller
2008-08-22  4:22                   ` David Miller
2008-08-22  4:29                   ` Mitch Bradley
2008-08-22  4:29                     ` Mitch Bradley
2008-08-22  4:30                     ` Grant Likely
2008-08-22  4:30                       ` Grant Likely
2008-08-22  4:30                       ` Grant Likely
2008-08-22  4:34                       ` Grant Likely
2008-08-22  4:34                         ` Grant Likely
2008-08-22  4:34                         ` Grant Likely
2008-08-22  4:37                         ` David Miller
2008-08-22  4:37                           ` David Miller
2008-08-22  4:37                           ` David Miller
2008-08-22  5:19                           ` Mitch Bradley [this message]
2008-08-22  5:19                             ` Mitch Bradley
2008-08-22  5:19                             ` Mitch Bradley
2008-08-22 16:00                             ` Yoder Stuart
2008-08-22 16:00                               ` Yoder Stuart
2008-08-22 16:00                               ` Yoder Stuart
2008-08-22 16:13                               ` Josh Boyer
2008-08-22 16:13                                 ` Josh Boyer
2008-08-22 16:13                                 ` Josh Boyer
2008-08-22 10:50               ` Josh Boyer
2008-08-22 10:50                 ` Josh Boyer
2008-08-22 10:50                 ` Josh Boyer
2008-08-22 11:06                 ` David Miller
2008-08-22 11:06                   ` David Miller
2008-08-22 11:06                   ` David Miller
2008-08-21 23:45         ` Jon Smirl
2008-08-21 23:45           ` Jon Smirl
2008-08-21 23:45           ` Jon Smirl
2008-08-22  2:33           ` Grant Likely
2008-08-22  2:33             ` Grant Likely
2008-08-22  2:33             ` Grant Likely
2008-08-22  2:39             ` Jon Smirl
2008-08-22  2:39               ` Jon Smirl
2008-08-22  2:39               ` Jon Smirl
2008-08-22 15:58               ` Scott Wood
2008-08-22 15:58                 ` Scott Wood
2008-08-22 15:58                 ` Scott Wood
2008-08-22 16:44               ` Grant Likely
2008-08-22 16:44                 ` Grant Likely
2008-08-22 16:44                 ` Grant Likely
2008-08-21 22:01   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-21 22:01     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-08-21 21:53 ` Jon Smirl
2008-08-21 21:53   ` Jon Smirl
2008-08-21 21:58   ` David Miller
2008-08-21 21:58     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48AE4C4A.8040804@firmworks.com \
    --to=wmb@firmworks.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.