All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@domain.hid>
To: Gilles Chanteperdrix <gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org>
Cc: Xenomai-core@domain.hid
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] Racy pse51_mutex_check_init?
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2008 12:51:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48AFEBB9.9080108@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48AFE9E9.3050509@domain.hid>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 830 bytes --]

Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi Gilles,
>>
>> trying to understand the cb_read/write lock usage, some question came up
>> here: What prevents that the mutexq iteration in pse51_mutex_check_init
>> races against pse51_mutex_destroy_internal?
>>
>> If nothing, then I wonder if we actually have to iterate over the whole
>> queue to find out whether a given object has been initialized and
>> registered already or not. Can't this be encoded differently?
> 
> We actually iterate over the queue only if the magic happens to be
> correct, which is not the common case.

However, there remains a race window with other threads removing other
mutex objects in parallel, changing the queue - risking a kernel oops.
And that is what worries me. It's unlikely. but possible. It's unclean.

Jan


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 258 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-23 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-23  8:33 [Xenomai-core] Racy pse51_mutex_check_init? Jan Kiszka
2008-08-23 10:21 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2008-08-23 10:34   ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2008-08-23 10:53   ` Philippe Gerum
2008-08-23 11:07     ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2008-08-23 11:13       ` Philippe Gerum
2008-08-23 11:16       ` Philippe Gerum
2008-08-23 11:31         ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2008-08-23 11:31       ` Jan Kiszka
2008-08-23 11:33         ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2008-08-23 10:43 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2008-08-23 10:51   ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2008-08-23 10:58     ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2008-08-23 11:02       ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2008-08-23 11:06         ` Jan Kiszka
2008-08-23 11:24           ` Gilles Chanteperdrix

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48AFEBB9.9080108@domain.hid \
    --to=jan.kiszka@domain.hid \
    --cc=Xenomai-core@domain.hid \
    --cc=gilles.chanteperdrix@xenomai.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.