From: Eugene Teo <eteo@redhat.com>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, security@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: add verification checks to SCTP_AUTH_KEY option
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 03:01:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48B371F1.5080605@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48B35B59.2020208@hp.com>
Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> Eugene Teo wrote:
>> Vlad Yasevich wrote:
[...]
>>> + if (authkey->sca_keylength > optlen) {
>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>> + goto out;
>> Is there a better upper bound check?
>
> Hm... optlen - sizeof(struct sctp_authkey) is more accurate.
>
> There is really no other bound.
Linus suggested that it is better to declare an upper bound for key_len.
I think it makes a lot of sense as a key shouldn't be as long as the
boundary limit of its declared data type.
Thanks,
Eugene
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eugene Teo <eteo@redhat.com>
To: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, security@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sctp: add verification checks to SCTP_AUTH_KEY option
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 11:01:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48B371F1.5080605@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48B35B59.2020208@hp.com>
Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> Eugene Teo wrote:
>> Vlad Yasevich wrote:
[...]
>>> + if (authkey->sca_keylength > optlen) {
>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>> + goto out;
>> Is there a better upper bound check?
>
> Hm... optlen - sizeof(struct sctp_authkey) is more accurate.
>
> There is really no other bound.
Linus suggested that it is better to declare an upper bound for key_len.
I think it makes a lot of sense as a key shouldn't be as long as the
boundary limit of its declared data type.
Thanks,
Eugene
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-26 3:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080825164440.GA504@kernel.sg>
2008-08-25 20:25 ` [PATCH] sctp: add verification checks to SCTP_AUTH_KEY option Vlad Yasevich
2008-08-25 20:25 ` Vlad Yasevich
2008-08-25 22:17 ` David Miller
2008-08-25 22:17 ` David Miller
2008-08-26 0:59 ` Eugene Teo
2008-08-26 0:59 ` Eugene Teo
2008-08-26 1:19 ` [Security] [PATCH] sctp: add verification checks to SCTP_AUTH_KEY Linus Torvalds
2008-08-26 1:19 ` [Security] [PATCH] sctp: add verification checks to SCTP_AUTH_KEY option Linus Torvalds
2008-08-26 1:28 ` [Security] [PATCH] sctp: add verification checks to SCTP_AUTH_KEY Linus Torvalds
2008-08-26 1:28 ` [Security] [PATCH] sctp: add verification checks to SCTP_AUTH_KEY option Linus Torvalds
2008-08-26 1:24 ` Vlad Yasevich
2008-08-26 1:24 ` Vlad Yasevich
2008-08-26 3:01 ` Eugene Teo [this message]
2008-08-26 3:01 ` Eugene Teo
2008-08-26 13:37 ` Vlad Yasevich
2008-08-26 13:37 ` Vlad Yasevich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48B371F1.5080605@redhat.com \
--to=eteo@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=vladislav.yasevich@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.