* Re: [TESTING] Device whitelist on cgroups [not found] ` <1219699261.5434.22.camel-NRFfyExJdYpgXGGE5LP+UZlqa2bBAFbm0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-08-26 13:33 ` Serge E. Hallyn [not found] ` <20080826133358.GB12266-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Serge E. Hallyn @ 2008-08-26 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Subrata Modak Cc: ltp-list, Andrew Morton, Veerendra Chandrappa, Linux Containers, Serge Hallyn, Paul Menage, Pavel Emelyanov Quoting Subrata Modak (subrata-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org): > Serge, > > I have another doubt. Are we also having the plan(s) to add testcases > for testing this new feature (Device whitelist on cgroups) added in > 2.6.26 under the DEVICE NAMESPACE category !! > > Regards-- > Subrata That's something I expect Veerendra would do next year. (Veerendra, if you have time this year, please let me know). It also seems likely that the openvz folks, who are using this, have some testcases they could share. Pavel? -serge ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20080826133358.GB12266-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [TESTING] Device whitelist on cgroups [not found] ` <20080826133358.GB12266-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-08-26 14:14 ` Pavel Emelyanov [not found] ` <48B40FC7.2000900-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Pavel Emelyanov @ 2008-08-26 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Serge E. Hallyn Cc: ltp-list, Andrew Morton, Veerendra Chandrappa, Linux Containers, Serge Hallyn, Subrata Modak, Paul Menage Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Subrata Modak (subrata-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org): >> Serge, >> >> I have another doubt. Are we also having the plan(s) to add testcases >> for testing this new feature (Device whitelist on cgroups) added in >> 2.6.26 under the DEVICE NAMESPACE category !! >> >> Regards-- >> Subrata > > That's something I expect Veerendra would do next year. (Veerendra, > if you have time this year, please let me know). > > It also seems likely that the openvz folks, who are using this, > have some testcases they could share. Pavel? We have and we could share them, but unfortunately their *implementation* is completely useless without the whole testing infrastructure we use (which it turn is too heavy and too Virtuozzo-specific to be shared). All I can is provide a single testcase we perform: set some permissions and check that the allowed devices are allowed and not allowed are not allowed ;) > -serge > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <48B40FC7.2000900-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [TESTING] Device whitelist on cgroups [not found] ` <48B40FC7.2000900-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-08-26 16:00 ` Serge E. Hallyn [not found] ` <20080826160003.GA21827-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Serge E. Hallyn @ 2008-08-26 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pavel Emelyanov Cc: ltp-list, Andrew Morton, Veerendra Chandrappa, Linux Containers, Serge Hallyn, Subrata Modak, Paul Menage Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xemul-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org): > Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Subrata Modak (subrata-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org): > >> Serge, > >> > >> I have another doubt. Are we also having the plan(s) to add testcases > >> for testing this new feature (Device whitelist on cgroups) added in > >> 2.6.26 under the DEVICE NAMESPACE category !! > >> > >> Regards-- > >> Subrata > > > > That's something I expect Veerendra would do next year. (Veerendra, > > if you have time this year, please let me know). > > > > It also seems likely that the openvz folks, who are using this, > > have some testcases they could share. Pavel? > > We have and we could share them, but unfortunately their > *implementation* is completely useless without the whole > testing infrastructure we use (which it turn is too heavy > and too Virtuozzo-specific to be shared). > > All I can is provide a single testcase we perform: set some > permissions and check that the allowed devices are allowed > and not allowed are not allowed ;) Ok, thanks, Pavel. Sounds like starting from scratch would be the simplest thing here. -serge ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20080826160003.GA21827-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [TESTING] Device whitelist on cgroups [not found] ` <20080826160003.GA21827-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> @ 2008-08-30 18:45 ` Subrata Modak 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Subrata Modak @ 2008-08-30 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Serge E. Hallyn, Pavel Emelyanov, Veerendra Cc: ltp-list, Andrew Morton, Veerendra Chandrappa, Linux Containers, Serge Hallyn, Paul Menage On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 11:00 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Pavel Emelyanov (xemul@openvz.org): > > Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > Quoting Subrata Modak (subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com): > > >> Serge, > > >> > > >> I have another doubt. Are we also having the plan(s) to add testcases > > >> for testing this new feature (Device whitelist on cgroups) added in > > >> 2.6.26 under the DEVICE NAMESPACE category !! > > >> > > >> Regards-- > > >> Subrata > > > > > > That's something I expect Veerendra would do next year. (Veerendra, > > > if you have time this year, please let me know). > > > > > > It also seems likely that the openvz folks, who are using this, > > > have some testcases they could share. Pavel? > > > > We have and we could share them, but unfortunately their > > *implementation* is completely useless without the whole > > testing infrastructure we use (which it turn is too heavy > > and too Virtuozzo-specific to be shared). > > > > All I can is provide a single testcase we perform: set some > > permissions and check that the allowed devices are allowed > > and not allowed are not allowed ;) > > Ok, thanks, Pavel. Sounds like starting from scratch would be > the simplest thing here. Pavel, You can even share that single test case with us. This can help Veerendra to get a direction when he starts writing for DEVICE Namespace test cases either this year, or, next year. I feel it´s always better to get a good start if we have some direction in our hands. Pavel, please share the same. Regards-- Subrata > > -serge _______________________________________________ Containers mailing list Containers@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/containers ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-08-30 18:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1219699261.5434.22.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <1219699261.5434.22.camel-NRFfyExJdYpgXGGE5LP+UZlqa2bBAFbm0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>
2008-08-26 13:33 ` [TESTING] Device whitelist on cgroups Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20080826133358.GB12266-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-08-26 14:14 ` Pavel Emelyanov
[not found] ` <48B40FC7.2000900-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2008-08-26 16:00 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20080826160003.GA21827-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-08-30 18:45 ` Subrata Modak
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.