Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] quicklist shouldn't be proportional to # of CPUs

[Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>]

KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>>> +	int node = numa_node_id();
>>> +	struct zone *zones = NODE_DATA(node)->node_zones;
>>> +	int num_cpus_on_node;
>>> +	node_to_cpumask_ptr(cpumask_on_node, node);
>>>  
>>>  	node_free_pages =
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_ZONE_DMA
>>> @@ -38,6 +41,10 @@ static unsigned long max_pages(unsigned 
>>>  		zone_page_state(&zones[ZONE_NORMAL], NR_FREE_PAGES);
>>>  
>>>  	max = node_free_pages / FRACTION_OF_NODE_MEM;
>>> +
>>> +	num_cpus_on_node = cpus_weight_nr(*cpumask_on_node);
>>> +	max /= num_cpus_on_node;
>>> +
>>>  	return max(max, min_pages);
>> Exactly!  And (many thanks to them!) the sparc maintainers have
>> implemented a similar internal function definition for node_to_cpumask_ptr().
> 
> Can I think get your Ack?
> 

Based on code review, sure.  I'll also give it a try on one of my
test machines as soon as I can.

Mike