From: "Timo Teräs" <timo.teras@iki.fi>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: xfrm_state locking regression...
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 08:45:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48BE245D.3060905@iki.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080903053935.GA8428@gondor.apana.org.au>
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 08:07:33AM +0300, Timo Teräs wrote:
>> Right. Also alternatively the xfrm_state_all could be protected
>> by a different lock than xfrm_state_lock.
>
> Yes that's a good idea. Here's a patch to do that for states.
> I'm still thinking about whether policy destruction should be
> restructured or not so I'm not patching that.
>
> ipsec: Move state dump list unlinking into GC
>
> This patch moves the unlinking of x->all (for dumping) into the
> GC and changes the lock to xfrm_cfg_mutex.
Shouldn't this also change the locking in all places where
x->all is used?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-03 5:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-03 2:51 xfrm_state locking regression David Miller
2008-09-03 3:00 ` David Miller
2008-09-03 5:01 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-03 5:07 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-03 5:23 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-03 5:39 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-03 5:40 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-09 12:25 ` David Miller
2008-09-03 5:39 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-03 5:45 ` Timo Teräs [this message]
2008-09-03 5:50 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-03 6:14 ` David Miller
2008-09-03 6:27 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-03 6:35 ` David Miller
2008-09-03 6:45 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-03 6:47 ` David Miller
2008-09-03 7:14 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-05 11:55 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-09 0:09 ` David Miller
2008-09-09 0:18 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-09 0:20 ` David Miller
2008-09-09 0:25 ` David Miller
2008-09-09 14:33 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-09 20:20 ` David Miller
2008-09-10 3:01 ` David Miller
2008-09-11 21:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-09-11 22:00 ` David Miller
2008-09-11 23:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-09-12 16:08 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-12 17:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2008-09-21 12:29 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-21 15:21 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-22 11:42 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-22 13:01 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-22 23:50 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-23 4:53 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-23 4:59 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-23 5:17 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-23 5:22 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-23 6:25 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-23 6:47 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-23 6:56 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-23 9:39 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-23 11:24 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-23 12:08 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-23 12:14 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-23 12:25 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-23 12:56 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-23 13:01 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-23 13:07 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-23 13:30 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-23 13:32 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-23 13:46 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-24 4:23 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-24 5:14 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-24 5:15 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-24 5:46 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-24 5:55 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-24 6:04 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-24 6:13 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-24 6:20 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-24 6:21 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-24 7:29 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-24 7:54 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-24 13:18 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-24 14:08 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-25 6:03 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-25 7:57 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-25 8:42 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-25 8:56 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-25 9:01 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-25 9:49 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-25 12:12 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-25 12:36 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-26 2:08 ` Herbert Xu
2008-10-01 10:07 ` David Miller
2008-10-01 14:05 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-23 2:48 ` David Miller
2008-09-10 3:04 ` David Miller
2008-09-10 3:15 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-10 3:22 ` David Miller
2008-09-10 3:23 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-10 3:38 ` David Miller
2008-09-10 4:01 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-10 4:06 ` David Miller
2008-09-10 4:22 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-10 4:24 ` David Miller
2008-09-10 4:48 ` David Miller
2008-09-10 4:52 ` David Miller
2008-09-10 4:53 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-10 5:21 ` David Miller
2008-09-10 5:16 ` Timo Teräs
2008-09-10 5:23 ` David Miller
2008-09-10 5:46 ` Herbert Xu
2008-09-03 6:10 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48BE245D.3060905@iki.fi \
--to=timo.teras@iki.fi \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.